Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Therapy Wars: The Revenge of Freud
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/07/therapy-wars-revenge-of-freud-cognitive-behavioural-therapyDr David Pollens is a psychoanalyst who sees his patients in a modest ground-floor office on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, a neighbourhood probably only rivalled by the Upper West Side for the highest concentration of therapists anywhere on the planet. Pollens, who is in his early 60s, with thinning silver hair, sits in a wooden armchair at the head of a couch; his patients lie on the couch, facing away from him, the better to explore their most embarrassing fears or fantasies. Many of them come several times a week, sometimes for years, in keeping with analytic tradition. He has an impressive track record treating anxiety, depression and other disorders in adults and children, through the medium of uncensored and largely unstructured talk.
To visit Pollens, as I did one dark winters afternoon late last year, is to plunge immediately into the arcane Freudian language of resistance and neurosis, transference and counter-transference. He exudes a sort of warm neutrality; you could easily imagine telling him your most troubling secrets. Like other members of his tribe, Pollens sees himself as an excavator of the catacombs of the unconscious: of the sexual drives that lurk beneath awareness; the hatred we feel for those we claim to love; and the other distasteful truths about ourselves we dont know, and often dont wish to know.
Cheap and effective, CBT became the dominant form of therapy, consigning Freud to psychologys dingy basement. But new studies have cast doubt on its supremacy and shown dramatic results for psychoanalysis. Is it time to get back on the couch?
But theres a very well-known narrative when it comes to therapy and the relief of suffering and it leaves Pollens and his fellow psychoanalysts decisively on the wrong side of history. For a start, Freud (this story goes) has been debunked. Young boys dont lust after their mothers, or fear their fathers will castrate them; adolescent girls dont envy their brothers penises. No brain scan has ever located the ego, super-ego or id. The practice of charging clients steep fees to ponder their childhoods for years while characterising any objections to this process as resistance, demanding further psychoanalysis looks to many like a scam. Arguably no other notable figure in history was so fantastically wrong about nearly every important thing he had to say than Sigmund Freud, the philosopher Todd Dufresne declared a few years back, summing up the consensus and echoing the Nobel prize-winning scientist Peter Medawar, who in 1975 called psychoanalysis the most stupendous intellectual confidence trick of the 20th century. It was, Medawar went on, a terminal product as well something akin to a dinosaur or a zeppelin in the history of ideas, a vast structure of radically unsound design and with no posterity.
To visit Pollens, as I did one dark winters afternoon late last year, is to plunge immediately into the arcane Freudian language of resistance and neurosis, transference and counter-transference. He exudes a sort of warm neutrality; you could easily imagine telling him your most troubling secrets. Like other members of his tribe, Pollens sees himself as an excavator of the catacombs of the unconscious: of the sexual drives that lurk beneath awareness; the hatred we feel for those we claim to love; and the other distasteful truths about ourselves we dont know, and often dont wish to know.
Cheap and effective, CBT became the dominant form of therapy, consigning Freud to psychologys dingy basement. But new studies have cast doubt on its supremacy and shown dramatic results for psychoanalysis. Is it time to get back on the couch?
But theres a very well-known narrative when it comes to therapy and the relief of suffering and it leaves Pollens and his fellow psychoanalysts decisively on the wrong side of history. For a start, Freud (this story goes) has been debunked. Young boys dont lust after their mothers, or fear their fathers will castrate them; adolescent girls dont envy their brothers penises. No brain scan has ever located the ego, super-ego or id. The practice of charging clients steep fees to ponder their childhoods for years while characterising any objections to this process as resistance, demanding further psychoanalysis looks to many like a scam. Arguably no other notable figure in history was so fantastically wrong about nearly every important thing he had to say than Sigmund Freud, the philosopher Todd Dufresne declared a few years back, summing up the consensus and echoing the Nobel prize-winning scientist Peter Medawar, who in 1975 called psychoanalysis the most stupendous intellectual confidence trick of the 20th century. It was, Medawar went on, a terminal product as well something akin to a dinosaur or a zeppelin in the history of ideas, a vast structure of radically unsound design and with no posterity.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 793 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Therapy Wars: The Revenge of Freud (Original Post)
LiberalElite
May 2016
OP
Nitram
(22,822 posts)1. It's not all about sex. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
But just when you least expect it, it turns out that sex actually was at the bottom of something. Freud was so attached to his cigars that he contracted throat cancer - and kept right on smoking them.
cprise
(8,445 posts)2. Somehow I was reminded of this Laurie Anderson performance