The real meaning of Donald Trump -- Tom Englehardt/Le Monde Diplomatique
Low-energy Jeb. "Little Marco." Lyin Ted. "Crooked Hillary." Give Donald Trump credit. He has a memorable way with insults. His have a way of etching themselves on the brain. And theyve garnered media coverage, analysis, and commentary almost beyond imagining. Memorable as they might be, however, they wont be what last of Trumps 2016 election run. Thats surely reserved for a single slogan that will sum up his candidacy when its all over (no matter how it ends). He arrived with it on that Trump Tower escalator in the first moments of his campaign and it now headlines his website, where its also emblazoned on an array of products from hats to t-shirts.
You already know which line I mean: Make America Great Again! With that exclamation point ensuring that you wont miss the hyperbolic, Trumpian nature of its promise to return the country to its former glory days. In it lies the essence of his campaign, of what hes promising his followers and Americans generally and yet, strangely enough, of all his lines, its the one most taken for granted, the one thats been given the least thought and analysis. And thats a shame, because it represents something new in our American age. The problem, I suspect, is that what first catches the eye is the phrase Make America Great and then, of course, the exclamation point, while the single most important word in the slogan, historically speaking, is barely noted: again.
With that again, Donald Trump crossed a line in American politics that, until his escalator moment, represented a kind of psychological taboo for politicians of any stripe, of either party, including presidents and potential candidates for that position. He is the first American leader or potential leader of recent times not to feel the need or obligation to insist that the United States, the sole superpower of Planet Earth, is an exceptional nation, an indispensable country, or even in an unqualified sense a great one. His claim is the opposite. That, at present, America is anything but exceptional, indispensable, or great, though he alone could make it great again. In that claim lies a curiosity that, in a court of law, might be considered an admission of guilt. Yes, it says, if one man is allowed to enter the White House in January 2017, this could be a different country, but and in this lies the originality of the slogan it is not great now, and in that admission-that-hasnt-been-seen-as-an-admission lies something new on the American landscape.
Donald Trump, in other words, is the first person to run openly and without apology on a platform of American decline. Think about that for a moment. Make America Great Again! is indeed an admission in the form of a boast. As he tells his audiences repeatedly, America, the formerly great, is today a punching bag for China, Mexico... well, you know the pitch. You dont have to agree with him on the specifics. Whats interesting is the overall vision of a country lacking in its former greatness.
http://mondediplo.com/openpage/the-real-meaning-of-donald-trump
bemildred
(90,061 posts)With Hillary Clintons strong performance on Tuesday night, the Democratic primaries are effectively over. Barring an unforeseen catastrophe, Clinton will be the Democratic nominee. And its increasingly likely that her opponent will be Donald Trump, who won a clean sweep of five states on Tuesday and only seems to be getting stronger. Both parties must now gear themselves for a Clinton-Trump match-up in the fall.
Clinton indicated as much in her victory speech last night. As in earlier speeches, she made a play of Trumps name and his penchant for racism, declaring, Love trumps hate. This slogan is an early clue as to how Clinton will frame the election, presenting herself as an inclusive advocate of national unity and Trump as an avatar of prejudice and divisiveness. Yet such an election poses unique problems that go beyond normal politics, and Clintons team may not yet appreciate how difficult this fight will be.
If winning the presidential election were all that mattered, Trump would be Clintons dream opponent. The Democratic front-runner struggles with poor approval ratings55.6 percent unfavorable, according to Huffington Posts aggregation of the pollswhich means she needs to compete against someone who is even less popular than her. Trump fits that bill handsomely, standing at 63.6 percent unfavorability. Furthermore, Trumps racism and misogyny are likely to motivate the very voters that Clinton most needs to attract: people of color, single women, and young people. And not surprisingly, in head-to-head polls, Clinton enjoys a hefty lead over Trump, even as she trails behind the less-polarizing John Kasich and enjoys a significantly smaller lead (of roughly 5 percentage points) over Ted Cruz.
Yet there are reasons why the real estate mogul should be a far greater cause for fear than Cruz or Kasich. Cruz might be a political extremist, further to the right than any serious presidential candidate since at least Barry Goldwater. But the Texas senator is still bound by the rules of normal politics, still beholden to donors and constituencies that serve as a check on what he can say or do. Cruz would be a predictable opponent in that hed follow a hyper-conservative script and make largely ideological arguments. Trump, in contrast, is not predictable in that manner and has no loyalty to traditional Republican causes. He could, as he has in the primaries, present himself as an opponent of the Iraq War and interventionism, a supporter of Planned Parenthood in non-abortion funding, an enemy of free trade pacts, and a defender of Social Security and Medicare.
https://newrepublic.com/article/133050/hillary-clinton-fear-donald-trump
this is going to be a wild ride, and the Dems have got to be prepared for it. Trump will stop at absolutely nothing...
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Cognitive disconnect about the "Trump phenomenon" all over the place, along with lots of confidence about their ability to beat him. I think he is a con man/showman of a better caliber than they are accustomed to being up against. They are used to being in control. He is not in control (yet) but he is plenty dangerous.
dhill926
(16,343 posts)elljay
(1,178 posts)in the many areas where Clinton is weak. He will follow Bernie in accusing her of being fully-owned by the corporations, assail her failed foreign policy, and condemn the international trade pacts she promoted. She, in turn, will not have an effective response. When she claims she has more government experience, Trump can merely say, "Yeah, but all of your decisions were bad." Most voters of any party already agree with that. The pundits are predicting a massive Trump defeat. I am not as confident when we are putting up a candidate who is adored by maybe 20% of voters, disliked by more than half, with the rest not sure whether it is best to vote for a crazy Republican or a conservative Democrat. Not a pretty picture.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders might be poles apart in their politics and temperament, but they are voicing visceral feelings of economic disenfranchisement and alienation among pessimistic voters who feel they've been ignored for years.
The billionaire and the democratic socialist are in different ways speaking for vast populations of Americans who feel threatened by globalization, who question the benefits of "free trade" that political leaders have peddled for decades and who believe distant elites control the economy in ways detrimental to their lives and prospects.
It is turning out to be a potent electoral brew -- which has lifted insurgent candidates like Trump and Sanders throughout the 2016 cycle and challenged foes like Hillary Clinton and establishment Republicans who have found it tougher to reconcile the grass-roots anger.
The cocktail of economic anxiety was clearly evident in the backstory of Trump's triumphs in Michigan and Mississippi and Sanders' surprise win in the Democratic primary in Michigan on Tuesday night.
"Michigan has been stripped. You look at those empty factories all over the place, and nobody hits that message better than me," Trump told CNN's Anderson Cooper on Wednesday.
The two men are not just playing on pre-occupations of those who see themselves as victims of the globalization and technological change that have scythed through the blue-collar economy. Seven years after the Great Recession erupted, wage growth is stagnant and under employment is rife. Structural economic issues that dogged the middle class even before 2008 have also been left to fester.
It doesn't matter that gas prices are at rock bottom, the unemployment rate is at its lowest point for eight years and Wall Street, despite a rocky several months, is up 40% over five years. College costs more, basic living standards are more expensive and good-paying jobs seem more precarious than ever. Many people are still asking: "When will the recovery reach me?" When opponents point out that neither vision comes with a set of ready-made solutions or even coherent policies, they almost miss the point.
That's because Trump and Sanders are appealing to gut-level emotions that amplify political movements, not the wonky details of trade or economic policy.
More of interesting read at......
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/09/politics/sanders-trump-economy-trade/index.html
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Donald Trump was fired up and ready to go on Wednesday morning.
Only hours after he swept five mid-Atlantic and New England states, Trump hit the airwaves, pounding home the message that its time for his rivals to drop out, while weighing in discursively on everything from his sleeping habits to Hillary Clintons shouting.
From CNN to MSNBC to ABC to Fox News, the famously sleep-deprived Manhattan real-estate mogul flexed his media muscle in triumph.
Shortly after 6 a.m., a drowsy-sounding Trump called into CNN's "New Day," where he at once celebrated his victories, ripped into "lyin' Ted" Cruz and John Kasich, turned his attention toward Clinton and reassured the world that he would keep being himself.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/trump-victory-lap-acela-primary-222522
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump celebrated his crushing victory over the abortive Rebel Alliance of John Kasich and Ted Cruz in Tuesday nights primaries by taking a victory lap on MSNBCs Morning Joe Wednesday morning, and quickly brought his general election strategy into unsubtle relief. Asked to react to Hillary Clintons riff on womens issues during her victory speech, Trump immediately went into a rant about Hillary shouting, reacted with an ewww, but when Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski pressed him on the issues that Hillary raised, Trump responded with nothing at all:
Brzezinski: It seems that would be the one area perhaps you say you have plans for Hillary. I would think shes incredibly strong on these issues.
Trump: I havent quite recovered, its early in the morning, from her shouting that message. I know a lot of people would say you cant say that about a woman, because of course a woman doesnt shout. The way she shouted that message was not, eww, thats the way she said it, and I guess Ill have to get used to a lot of that over the next four or five months.
Brzezinski: What about issue pertaining to women she discussed including equal pay and right to choose.
Trump: Were going to do very well. Were going to do very well with Hillary and women as soon as we start our process against her. Were going to do very well.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/donald-trump-on-hillary-shouting-eww-i-guess-ill-have-to-get-used-to-a-lot-of-that/
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Donald Trump went after Hillary Clinton again this morning, saying that if she is not charged over her private email server, he would seek to reopen the investigation.
Trump responded to a Fox and Friends viewer's question on the subject. The man wanted to know whether Trump, as president, would instruct his attorney general to look into the emails, the Clinton Foundation and Benghazi in the event that the former secretary of state does not face charges stemming from the current FBI investigation.
Trump's response?
"Yes."
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/04/27/trump-if-hillary-isnt-charged-i-would-have-attorney-general-reopen-investigation
KoKo
(84,711 posts)and it will be interesting to see how it goes.
Bernie is nicely positioned if something occurs with the investigation. In spite of all the moaning about his "great losses" he has done respectably well enough to be a very viable candidate for November. The talk about bringing Biden in, is just more foolishness from MSM.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)It will be epic, if it stays the way it looks now.
I think Bernie is kind of in the position of staying busy and seeing how it goes. As those of us who remember 1968 know, things can get really messy.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)After five massive wins along the Acela corridor Tuesday night, Donald Trump has set his sights on November. And to prepare himself for his title match with Hillary Clinton, the Donald plans to read up on this democratic socialist all the kids are talking about.
"Bernie Sanders has a message that's interesting. I'm going to be taking a lot of the things Bernie said and using them," a very drowsy Trump told the Morning Joe crew. "I can reread some of his speeches and get some very good material."
Earlier this month, Sanders argued that Clinton's bad judgment called into question her qualifications for the presidency. Trump expressed admiration for that line of attack.
"He said some things about her that are actually surprising. That essentially she has no right to even be running. She's got bad judgment," the GOP front-runner continued. "When he said bad judgment, I said 'sound bite!' But Bernie has been treated very badly by the Democrats and Democratic Party. Frankly, he should run as an independent, I think."
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/04/trump-bernie-gave-me-a-lot-of-good-sound-bites.html
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Donald Trumps candidacy is already tearing the conservative movement apart. The Guardian recently reported that Friends of Abe, a secretive group of Hollywood conservatives, would disbandand speculation is that infighting over Donald Trumps candidacy was a contributing factor. Meanwhile, Eagle Forum, the pro-family group founded by Phyllis Schlafly in 1972 is being ripped apart, with Schlafly (and, presumably, her successor Ed Martin) backing Trump, while other prominent and longtime board members backing Cruz.
The Eagle Forum schism is perhaps the most interesting, inasmuch as a suit over the future of the group is currently being litigated. Depending on whom you ask, this is either the story of Pro-Cruz Plotters Against Phyllis Schlafly dragging the grande dame of the conservative movement into courtor the story of an ambitious male Trump supporter named Ed Martin, who has hijacked a conservative womens group, and is manipulating its elderly founder (who should clearly have retired decades ago). I suspect the latter narrative is the closest to the truth, but who knows?
There are twists: Even the Schlafly family is divided over this. Schlaflys son (who, to add another plot twist, is openly gay) is on Team Martin, while Schlaflys daughter is supporting the board members who are trying to wrest control from Martin.
Some are wrongly portraying this as a suit against Phyllis Schlafly (she may well side with Ed Martin, but it is Martin and Schlaflys son who are named as the defendants). Interestingly, the board members actually argue that Martin has already been removed from his post, via a majority vote of the board, but is refusing to relinquish control.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/27/donald-trump-is-already-ripping-the-conservative-movement-apart/
KoKo
(84,711 posts)I had it all ready to post, came here, and saw you had beat me to it!
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I have felt this was going to be a "watershed" election for some time, but it's starting the jell now, very old school really, but not seen for 50 years, since the sixties. I could point to various things, the breaking of the media monopoly on information and most importantly disinformation, Citizen's United, our repeated foreign policy and economic failures; but the bottom line is a large portion of the US voting public is rejecting the prospects being offered to them by the established parties, and an accomplished media-savvy demogague is taking control of one of them. It won't be business as usual.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)36 years of "things have never been better, and are going to BE better" and blissed-out personality-cult politics by both parties have accompanied an economic contraction unprecedented in history, masked only by the rise of a McMansion class
bemildred
(90,061 posts)The city on the hill has proven to be full of WalMarts and WalMart jobs too.
Which is not unlike what brought the USSR down. The fundamental premise of the post-Vietnam empire was that it would be good for US, successful, no draft, no sacrifices, not unlike what Trump promises now, but he has more credibility than they do in DC, that is what they don't get, they did not deliver, have not delivered. They're going to be fired, and Trump is just the guy for that, as we all know from TV.
Took longer than I thought too, but Obama has done a very good job of trying to patch things up. He is our Gorbachev, the guy that attempted orderly reform, Trump will be our Yeltsin, the guy who just has another drink and says fuck it.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Clinton's campaign will roll out Podesta and Lena Dunham to mock the nasty ol' white blue-collars killing themselves after being jobless for a decade; Trump will give them batons and a list of addresses
bemildred
(90,061 posts)The Lee Atwater/Karl Rove style of contrived attacks will not work on him, he makes no pretense to be otherwise. They only work on sanctimonious Democrats and Republican sexual predators, people who feel guilty.
We've been there a while now with the attempts to dismiss and degrade him, and it's not working, and he just keeps getting stronger. And he is starting to talk policy, he's not just whoring for attention any more.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)---
Mikhail Gorbachev another revolutionary of humanity and decency had a similar aspiration in the 1980s. Interestingly, he took inspiration from John Paul IIs argument that people are not free unless they determine their system of government and help create their own laws, and tried to advance democratization within the rigid Soviet system.
By bringing a message of justice to communisms victims, Gorbachev firmly believed that he could reinvigorate the Soviet Unions dying ideology. And, for a moment, he did. When the Gorbachev-led 19th National Communist Party Congress was broadcast on television in 1988, the country breathlessly watched its young leader publicly debate his reform ideas, most notably with Andrei Sakharov, a famed nuclear physicist and dissident human-rights activist.
Ultimately, of course, the Soviet Unions ossified structure could not be saved; but, thanks in large part to Gorbachevs fundamental decency, the USSRs demise in 1991 was rather peaceful. He created an environment in which demands for radical change led to compromise, not rage in sharp contrast to, say, the violent breakup of Yugoslavia.
Like Francis and Sanders, Gorbachev was an improbable reformer. Despite rising to power with the support of the KGB, he did not surrender his thought processes to that machine, in the way that President Vladimir Putin clearly has. Likewise, far from fitting the mold of the Democratic machine, Sanders is working to pull the party back to the social democratic left where it belongs. And many in the Vatican today cannot fathom Franciss approach, viewing his messages of mercy as a watering down of the Catholic doctrine.
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/pope-francis-bernie-sanders-progressive-by-nina-l--khrushcheva-2016-04
This was a very good read.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And yes, a good read, and interesting point of view.
But I wanted to show that my view of Gorbachev is not crazy too.
I saw an interesting interview with her a couple of years ago on RT, so it was good to read her perspective on "The Reformers."
I still have hope for Bernie, "The Reformer," that Hillary will not succeed against him with her Money Machine and Power Organization. If Trump implodes, due to circumstances we can't now foresee, and Hillary's investigation by FBI doesn't go well for her, then it would be Bernie vs. Cruz.
This snip from the article:
bemildred
(90,061 posts)---
So, instead of trying to pick through the mess, here's a list, in no way comprehensive, of the many times Trump contradicted himself while laying out his alleged foreign policy:
We have to be both stable and completely unpredictable: Trump repeatedly said the United States had "no coherent foreign policy" and needed to again become a stable and dependable ally. How to do that? "We must, as a nation, be more unpredictable."
China is destroying the United States economically, but we have huge economic leverage over China: Trump loves to attack China, and he once again complained about the United States' large (but shrinking) trade deficit with China that's "letting them take advantage of us economically." But he also claimed that the Obama administration has huge, unspecified financial leverage over China, which isn't being used to make China take a tougher line against North Korea.
We'll be an incredible ally again. Also, our allies are freeloaders: Trump once again criticized other countries for not spending enough on their own defense. "Our allies are not paying their fair share," he complained, promising to somehow make them boost their defense budgets. He then pledged that America would again be a powerful and respected ally to the same countries he had insulted.
We can't waste money, but we have to spend a lot more on weapons: "Not one dollar can be wasted," Trump said of the federal budget, blaming much of America's supposed decline on government overspending and debt. He also called for the United States to pump cash into building new weapons to rebuild the American military, demanding hugely expensive and wasteful systems such as new fighter aircraft and warships.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/04/trumps-foreign-policy-speech
KoKo
(84,711 posts)And, he was so stiff and Unlike "The Donald"...I thought he'd been "Captured"...if you get my drift.
IOWD's.... He seemed so "Ordinary," reading from the Teleprompter, that he lost what made "Trump/Trump."
It's the fault his new Campaign Manager who has some kind of shady background was what the report I saw, said. He's torn between his original Campaign Guy who had the incident with the reporter and the new one with foreign ties to the shady stuff.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I think those who say we are turning to the general election now are right, because of Trump, Trump is for sure. And if you read what he says, it's pretty clear who his target audience is too.
I did see a discussion afterwards with General Barry McCaffery on MSNBC (the General who was Paid by CNN aways back) who has his own personal business interests that he didn't disclose when he was promoted as CNN's "Military Consultant." I assume MSNBC paid him more so he switched over.
He seemed to be very pleased, in general, with what Trump said, acknowledging that he thought it was a prepared speech with only a little of the Real Donald thrown in. Jeffrey Goldberg was also on the panel. I assumed his speech was to reassure the MIC Community that "The Donald" wouldn't be heavy on the Big Button or Red Phone or whatever they use now to start the nukes. They mentioned he was favorable to partnership with Putin.
I'll have to force myself watch the "YT" of the whole thing to see everything he mentioned in his speech.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I'm not getting into McCaffery, I'd say unpleasant things.
But yeah, not everybody is upset by Trumps rise, I'll post a few to follow:
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker praised Donald Trumps foreign policy speech on Wednesday night, calling it a great step in the right direction.
Speaking to MSNBC host Chris Matthews on his program Hardball, the Tennessee Republican said that Trumps remarks, delivered at Washington's Mayflower Hotel earlier in the day, were full of substance" and he was very pleased with what he heard.
If you look at the broadness, the vision, I thought it was a major step forward, Corker said.
Corker also released a written statement urging the billionaire front-runner to be more specific in outlining his new "coherent" vision for America if elected president.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/bob-corker-donald-trump-foreign-policy-speech-222558
KoKo
(84,711 posts)During the Financial Crisis of 2008 he was Bloomberg/CNBC Financial Business news "Go to Guy" and he still pops up on Foreign Relations. He and Trump do have Real Estate Investment interests (with Corker, shady) in common and this is interesting about saving taxpayer dollars and the Iran Deal.
------------------
Lawmaker Blocks Deal to Sell F-16s to Pakistan
By
Gordon Lubold
Feb 10, 2016 5:48 pm ET
1 COMMENTS
WASHINGTON A senior Republican senator is blocking the Obama administrations subsidized sale of as many as eight new F-16 jet fighters to Pakistan because of Islamabads relationship with a militant group known for targeting U.S.-trained security forces in neighboring Afghanistan.
Sen. Bob Corker (R., Tenn.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told Secretary of State John Kerry in a letter that he couldnt allow the Obama administration to use taxpayer funds to support the sale of the jets.
He cited attacks by the group known as the Haqqani network, saying the government in Islamabad continues to provide haven to its leaders.
Mr. Corker, who recently returned from his fifth trip to Afghanistan, said the Pakistani government should be welcome to purchase the F-16s with its own money. The planned sale through the State Departments foreign military sales program, announced last year, aims to reward Pakistan for its efforts against militants.
I do not want U.S. taxpayer dollars going to support these acquisitions, Mr. Corker said in an interview. While were spending tremendous amounts of U.S. dollars and certainly tremendous sacrifice in our men and women in uniform and by other agencies, they are working simultaneously to destabilize Afghanistan.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/02/10/senator-wants-to-block-sale-of-f-16-fighters-to-pakistan/
--------------
Republican Senator Bob Corker Is A Traitor
#AprilFoolsDeal
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker of Tennessee
Tennessee Republican Senator Bob Corker is a traitor
George Rasley, CHQ Editor | 4/15/2015
Traitor is strong language, but in the aftermath of Tuesdays vote on a bill that was supposed to reaffirm the Senates constitutional power to consent to President Obamas as yet still undefined and undisclosed nuclear treaty with Iran there is no other way to describe the actions of Senator Bob Corker, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
The bill Corker rammed through the Foreign Relations Committee is worse than no bill at all.
What Corkers bill does is, in its post-markup form, require the president to submit for congressional review the final nuclear agreement reached between Iran, the U.S. and its five negotiating partners. The bill does maintain the prohibition on the president waiving congressionally enacted sanctions against Iran during the review period.
However, the review period in the measure has been shortened from 60 days to an initial 30 days. If, at the end of the 30 days, Congress were to pass a bill on sanctions relief and send it to the president, an additional 12 days would be automatically added to the review period. This could be another 10 days of review if the president vetoed the resulting sanctions bill.
http://www.conservativehq.com/node/20107
-----------------
Sen. Corkers Real Estate Investments in Question
Ties to REIT Under Scrutiny
December 2, 2015
Brena Swanson
Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) is in the spotlight for alleged insider trading after the Wall Street Journal started asking questions about his ties to a REIT and Yahoo published an article detailing his ties to other real estate companies. Per Yahoo:
Bethany McLean, a contributing editor at Vanity Fair and bestselling author, wrote the Yahoo article that attempts to unravel the complex story behind Corker's involvement with a company called CBL & Associates Properties (CBL), which is one of the countrys largest shopping mall REITs.
According to the article, Corker, his wife and daughters made approximately 70 "opportune and very profitable trades" in the stock of a company called CBL & Associates Properties.
The article noted that the senator told Yahoo Finance several years ago that he had a Bloomberg terminal.
http://www.housingwire.com/articles/35746-sen-corkers-real-estate-investments-in-question
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee is a plum job.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Delivering what his campaign billed as a major foreign policy address, Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump staked out unusual territory for him Wednesday somewhere close to middle ground.
His speech to a group of foreign policy mandarins was notable for its contradictions, lack of specifics and occasional belligerence. But he did not repeat several radical ideas he has espoused on the stump such as promoting the spread of nuclear weapons that would upend decades of U.S. policy.
Speaking a day after he swept five states and moved within striking range of the GOP nomination, Trump clearly sought to reassure those nervous about his understanding of America's military and diplomatic obligations and commitments around the globe.
He hewed broadly to the lines of orthodox Republican doctrine on national security and foreign policy, positing that the United States should assert its interests in global economic and diplomatic endeavors.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-fg-trump-foreign-policy-20160427-story.html
bemildred
(90,061 posts)If this is the way Donald Trump wants to play, Hillary Clintons campaign says bring it on.
With the party nominations now mostly locked in, Trump decided to aim his first salvo of the general election campaign squarely at Clintons gender. How Clintons campaign dealt with attack is a microcosm of how they plan to deal with, and ultimately defeat, Trump in November.
If Hillary Clinton were a man, I dont think shed get 5 percent of the vote, Trump said at a press conference Tuesday before all the results had even come in from the days primary elections. The only thing shes got going is the womans card, and the beautiful thing is, women dont like her.
He followed it up Wednesday during an appearance on MSNBCs Morning Joe by saying he still hasnt quite recovered from her shouting the night before: I know a lot of people would say you cant say that about a woman, because of course a woman doesnt shout.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clintons-five-step-plan-beat-trumps-personal-attacks
bemildred
(90,061 posts)So that is what a presidential Donald Trump looks like.
The Republican frontrunner delivered the most scripted, and stilted, speech of his 10-month presidential campaign on Wednesday. He used a teleprompter. He spoke softly and deliberately. And at different points in the nearly 40-minute address, he pledged as president to develop a foreign policy that would both be unpredictable and consistent.
A day after declaring himself the GOPs presumptive nominee, Trump wanted to show the club of political insiders who have long snubbed him that, yes, he could give a sober, considered address on his vision for the world. Yet by design or not, the awkwardness of Trumps presentation made clear that this was not the freewheeling anti-politician who has won the votes of more than 10 million Republicans over the last four months. There was no rapturous crowd of thousands to hear him at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, just a couple hundred people who responded to a few of his punchier declarations with meek applause. And while the address neatly summarized the various foreign-policy positions Trump has taken in interviews and at campaign rallies, it did not eliminate their inherent contradictions.
Those began right at the top.
http://www.defenseone.com/politics/2016/04/trump-makes-his-own-head-spin-talking-foreign-policy/127858/
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump delivered a 40-minute detailed foreign policy speech today highlighting his views on trade, terrorism, economic freedom, Iran and China. Trump used a teleprompter to articulate a clear vision in which he said he would implement a foreign policy "that replaces randomness with purpose" and where "the American people are first."
"We went from mistakes in Iraq to Egypt to Libya, to President Barack Obamas line in the sand in Syria. Each of these actions have helped to throw the region into chaos, and gave ISIS the space it needs to grow and prosper," said Trump.
Trump made five key points, the first of which was that "U.S. resources are depleted." Trump blamed deficits, debt, low growth and open borders, saying America must "regain our financial independence and strength." Trump went on to chastise our allies for not paying enough for their own safety, claiming only four other countries in NATO pay the required 2% of GDP on defense spending. "Our allies must contribute toward the financial, political and human costs of our tremendous security burden or "the U.S. must be prepared to let these countries defend themselves."
But Trumps third point showed just how difficult the first two points will be to implement. While Trump says he is willing to walk away from allies unwilling or unable to pay their fair share, he says "At the same time, your friends need to know that you will stick by the agreements that you have with them."
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/richard-grenell-trump-foreign-policy-clear/2016/04/27/id/726148/
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Apr. 27, 2016 - 6:22 - LifeZette Editor-in-Chief Laura Ingraham on Donald Trumps presidential campaign and Bobby Knights endorsement of the GOP frontrunner.
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4866593060001/laura-ingraham-on-the-importance-of-bobby-knight-endorsing-trump/?#sp=show-clips
bemildred
(90,061 posts)At a campaign rally in Indianapolis on Wednesday, famously furious basketball coach Bobby Knight endorsed famously furiouser basketball Donald Trump, saying he will be one of the best presidents in U.S. history.
Bobby Knight endorses @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/P85y0vEZah
POLITICO (@politico) April 27, 2016
There has never been a more honest politician than Donald Trump, Knight told the crowd. You folks are taking a look at the most prepared man in history to step in as president of the United States.
In 2013, Knight called hope the worst word in the English language. With Knights endorsement, Trump surely has the despair vote on lock. Go Hoosiers!
http://gawker.com/angry-white-guy-endorses-angrier-orange-guy-1773512733
bemildred
(90,061 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)Exit polls from Tuesday night show Donald Trump's popularity appears to be increasing among Republicans.
You can forget that part about Trump being just the candidate of the angry, frustrated, poorly educated rural Republicans who are fed up with the Republican establishment.
He won everywhere among every group in last night's five-state sweep, including places where the establishment he opposed is strongest.
He won affluent Montgomery County in the Washington suburbs where many in the Republican establishment live. He won even bigger in Fairfield County, Connecticut, home of many who work on Wall Street.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/campaign-2016-schieffer-trump-not-just-the-candidate-of-angry-frustrated-poorly-educated-gop/
KoKo
(84,711 posts)where they showed all the states that voted and you could go to the counties to see the totals, precints, etc.
What they have up now might be interesting. It was interesting to see all the wealthy areas of CT (NY Financial Hedge Fund/Wall St. Crowd) along with the NYC Media Celebrities who also have high priced homes there, going for both Trump and Hillary.
And then there is Maryland with it's closeness to DC where many of the DC Political Operative, Lobbyists, Lawyers, Pollsters, etc. live along with High Powered Military Retirees who have estates on the Maryland shore (Rumsfeld/Cheney live nearby on the shore)... was fully for Trump/Hillary. Then add in Baltimore where the BLM and others who are near Poverty level and that they ALL went for Hillary is quite amazing. The Rich and the Very Poor all have Hillary in common?
So Hillary won both the 1% in the larger cities in CT, Baltimore & DC Suburbs and Shore in Maryland, plus the major cities in Pennsylvania with the rich and the Poorist. The Green on the Map was Bernie which was mostly in rural areas with a few splits in the poorest sections in some county areas of the cities and few other outliers in the rural areas!
Given that Independents couldn't vote in any of these close primaries and the registrations may have been too early to "Feel the Bern" ...I'd say Bernie still managed to do much better than anyone should have expected.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/national-results-map
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I think the essential divide is between those who know they have been screwed and those who still think they are doing all right.
And for some which sorts of fearmongering they find most convincing.
And there are those who favor or oppose things on principle, but most of them will change their minds if they get screwed or rewarded enough.
And I think we are still just ramping it up. Six months, big primaries, both conventions, and the general, yet to go.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)---
Would a new Trump be revealed?
In fact there was no new Trump. His speech did not deviate from the themes he has already enunciated and it showed that he is willing to go very far indeed. Nothing like this has been heard from a Republican foreign policy candidate in decades. Trump doesnt want to modify the partys foreign policy stands. Hes out to destroy them. In his speech, Trump declared that U.S. foreign policy since the Cold War has been incoherent under both Democratic and Republican administrations. He said its been a complete and total disaster. ... No vision. No purpose. No direction. No strategy.
Trump made it plain in his speech that his implicit No. 1 credential for becoming commander in chief is that although not in government service, I was totally against the war in Iraq, saying for many years that it would destabilize the Middle East. This represents an assault against Hillary Clinton as well as the neoconservative establishment in the GOP.
This is why perhaps his most significant statement was: I will also look for talented experts with new approaches, and practical ideas, rather than surrounding myself with those who have perfect résumés but very little to brag about except responsibility for a long history of failed policies and continued losses at war. What Trump is talking about is dispensing with an entire wing of the GOP that has controlled the commanding heights of foreign policy over recent decades.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/trump-foreign-policy-speech-why-i-hosted-it-213858