Panama Papers: Act now. Don't wait for another crisis Thomas Piketty
The question of tax havens and financial opacity has been headline news for years now. Unfortunately, in this area there is a huge gap between the triumphant declarations of governments and the reality of what they actually do.
In 2014, the LuxLeaks investigation revealed that multinationals paid almost no tax in Europe, thanks to their subsidiaries in Luxembourg. In 2016, the Panama Papers have shown the extent to which financial and political elites in the north and the south conceal their assets. We can be glad to see that the journalists are doing their job. The problem is that the governments are not doing theirs. The truth is that almost nothing has been done since the crisis in 2008. In some ways, things have even got worse.
Lets take each topic in turn. Exacerbated fiscal competition on the taxing of profits of big companies has reached new heights in Europe. The United Kingdom is going to reduce its rate to 17%, something unheard of for a major country, while continuing to protect the predatory practices of the Virgin Islands and other offshore centres under the British Crown. If nothing is done, we will all ultimately align ourselves on the 12% of Ireland, or possibly on 0%, or even on grants to investments, as is already sometimes the case. In the meantime, in the United States where there is a federal tax on profits, that rate is 35% (not including the taxes levelled by states, ranging between 5% and 10%).
It is the political fragmentation of Europe and the lack of a strong public authority which puts us at the mercy of private interests. The good news is that there is a way out of the current political impasse. If four countries, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, who together account for over 75% of the GDP and the population in the eurozone put forward a new treaty based on democracy and fiscal justice, with as a strong measure the adoption of a common tax system for large corporations, then the other countries would be forced to follow them. If they did not do so they would not be in compliance with the improvement in transparency which public opinions have been demanding for years and would be open to sanctions.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/09/panama-papers-tax-havens-thomas-piketty
Meteor Man
(385 posts)This may warrant investigation. I am unable to get links to work and can't vouch for the site called "Inquisitr".
A Recommended diary at Dkos has a diary about John Podesta and his brother Tony being "indirectly" linked to a Russian bank and two "alleged" shell companies "associated"with Putin.
I can't vouch for the reliability or critique the source. I look forward to analysis from someone who has been around these parts longer than I have. (and maybe even proficient enough to provide links)
Peace Out.
Meteor Man
(385 posts)The Dkos diary about Bill Black joining the Sanders campaign linked to the Inquisitr website. I ran across the Panama Paper story when I clicked in the Bill Black diary.
I did not intend to mislead anyone that the Podesta Group story from the Inquisitr was covered at Dkos.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Don't worry about it.
I usually cut and paste them directly, but that doesn't always work either. Sometimes it's better to find another source, or look for a better story.
I think the Podesta thing needs more support before one treats it as news and not campaign bullshit, but I don't think it's ridiculous either.
Why I emphasized so many questionable adjectives.
Time will tell.
Califonz
(465 posts)Or just invade militarily?
Martin Eden
(12,869 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)from the article:
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Who wants to be a stodgy reliable honest banker when you can be the Wolf of Wall Street?