DC Press Corps Spins Itself Silly Over Sanders’ Specifics
DC Press Corps Spins Itself Silly Over Sanders Specifics
By Dean Baker
Apr
7
2016
The Washington press corps has gone into one of its great feeding frenzies over Bernie Sanders interview with New York Daily News. Sanders avoided specific answers to many of the questions posed, which the DC gang are convinced shows a lack of the knowledge necessary to be president.
Among the frenzied were the Washington Posts Chris Cillizza, The Atlantics David Graham and Vanity Fairs Tina Nguyen, with CNNs Dylan Byers telling about it all. Having read the transcript of the interview, I would say that I certainly would have liked to see more specificity in Sanders answers, but Im an economist. And some of the complaints are just silly.
When asked how he would break up the big banks, Sanders said he would leave that up to the banks. Thats exactly the right answer. The government doesnt know the most efficient way to break up JP Morgan; JP Morgan does. If the point is to downsize the banks, the way to do it is to give them a size cap and let them figure out the best way to reconfigure themselves to get under it.
The same applies to Sanders not knowing the specific statute for prosecuting banks for their actions in the housing bubble. Knowingly passing off fraudulent mortgages in a mortgage-backed security is fraud. Could the Justice Department prove this case against high-level bank executives? Who knows, but they obviously didnt try.
More:
http://fair.org/home/dc-press-corps-spins-itself-silly-over-sanders-specifics/