Krugman on the Corruption of our Nation via Perverse Incentives
By William K. Black
April 4, 2016 Bloomington, MN
Paul Krugman April Fools Day column launched another attack on Bernie Sanders. In it he announces that he, a strong Hilary Clinton supporter, is Dad and gets to set the rules for candidates its time to lay out some guidelines for good and bad behavior. This is a lot like John McEnroe giving lectures on tennis etiquette. Two sentences later, Krugman mocks voters for Sanders in very white states, which is a pretty clear example of bad behavior. Tellingly, Krugman is oblivious to his bad behavior. Krugman ends with this patronizing and insulting sentence: Sanders doesnt need to drop out, but he needs to start acting responsibly. Krugman is obviously itching to instruct Bernie to drop out and hand the contest to his candidate.
First, the Sanders campaign needs to stop feeding the right-wing disinformation machine. Engaging in innuendo suggesting, without evidence, that Clinton is corrupt is, at this point, basically campaigning on behalf of the RNC.
There is something quite wonderful to using false innuendo to falsely declare a rival candidate guilty of using innuendo. But it gets better for Krugmans second basis for attacking Bernie and his staff is that they have a conflict of interest.
Its important to realize that there are some real conflicts of interest here. For Sanders campaign staff, and also for anyone who has been backing his insurgency, its been one heck of a ride, and they would understandably like it to go on as long as possible. But weve now reached the point where whats fun for the campaign isnt at all the same as whats good for America.
That too is a paragraph that exemplifies the true meaning of April Fools Day. Ill start with the conflict of interest. Under Krugmans idiosyncratic definition of conflict of interest any candidate behind in an electoral contest should drop out, or at least praise his or her opponent. Krugmans claim is self-refuting and Hilary or Bill Clinton were both guilty of a conflict of interest under Krugmans preposterous definition of that term.
in full: http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2016/04/krugman-corruption-nation-via-perverse-incentives.html
fasttense
(17,301 posts)"For anyone who has been backing his insurgency." Senator Bernie Sanders is an insurgent? How dare he run against the Clintons.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)that his pro stance on globalization was a sham?
Krugman has been a water-boy for the establishment for some time.