Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Gadfly and the Grinder
Its not an actual Aesops Fable, of course. But if old Aesop were to fashion the equivalent from political archetypes, the Gadfly and the Grinder would certainly be included.http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/02/the-gadfly-and-the-grinder/463467/
The Gadfly uses the platform of public office to criticize, to issue jeremiads, to challenge the rest of his colleagues and the country to think outside the narrow frame of status quo possibility. To the Gadfly, the choice is between half-measures and full measures, and half-measures represent failures of nerve and imagination.
The Grinder, on the other hand, uses the machinery of public office to make progress incrementally, to construct coalitions, to grind out ungainly compromises. To the Grinder, the choice is between half-measures and no measures, and no measures are what you get when you dont show up and persist in the process every day.
...
There is nothing wrong with being a Gadfly. ... But what Clinton needs to argue is that while the Gadfly is necessary in a democracy, it is never sufficient. The Gadfly can push the president and Congress to do more, think bigger, and imagine better. But the Gadfly rarely makes an effective executive. Its true, of course, that Grinders arent the only kind of politician who make good mayors and governors and presidents. But Clinton should make the case that a Gadfly like Sanders is constitutionally wired to point out shortcomings, to shout at the people making the unsatisfying trade-offs of lawmakingnot to lead the work.
...
In a happy version of this imagined fable, the Gadfly and the Grinder learn from and strengthen one another and the entire ecosystem becomes healthier. In the unhappy version, each one gets set on the idea that theres only one way to be, and their mutual myopia leaves us with an impoverished politics.
The Grinder, on the other hand, uses the machinery of public office to make progress incrementally, to construct coalitions, to grind out ungainly compromises. To the Grinder, the choice is between half-measures and no measures, and no measures are what you get when you dont show up and persist in the process every day.
...
There is nothing wrong with being a Gadfly. ... But what Clinton needs to argue is that while the Gadfly is necessary in a democracy, it is never sufficient. The Gadfly can push the president and Congress to do more, think bigger, and imagine better. But the Gadfly rarely makes an effective executive. Its true, of course, that Grinders arent the only kind of politician who make good mayors and governors and presidents. But Clinton should make the case that a Gadfly like Sanders is constitutionally wired to point out shortcomings, to shout at the people making the unsatisfying trade-offs of lawmakingnot to lead the work.
...
In a happy version of this imagined fable, the Gadfly and the Grinder learn from and strengthen one another and the entire ecosystem becomes healthier. In the unhappy version, each one gets set on the idea that theres only one way to be, and their mutual myopia leaves us with an impoverished politics.
Excellent read, IMO.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1044 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Gadfly and the Grinder (Original Post)
BlueMTexpat
Feb 2016
OP
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)1. more poo from those in power and afraid of change
Change the Narrative
djean111
(14,255 posts)2. It is what I fear Hillary would want to "get done incrementally" that compels me to support Bernie.
I do not want a president who is for war, the TPP, cluster bombs, fracking, increased H-1B visas....to name a few things Hillary likes. Your fable presupposes that both candidates want to accomplish the same things.
No, they do not. And therein lies the tale. And the support.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)3. We need more than "incrementalism"
I'm voting for the "Gadfly".