Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,080 posts)
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:09 AM Jan 2016

Bleak Prospects for Latin America Under Trans-Pacific Partnership


Bleak Prospects for Latin America Under Trans-Pacific Partnership

Thursday, 07 January 2016 00:00
By Ian Gustafson, Council on Hemispheric Affairs | News Analysis


The Trans-Pacific Partnership, agreed to on October 5, 2015 by the twelve participating countries, is likely to prove disastrous for the Latin American states—Chile, Mexico, and Perú—that have joined the pact up to now. Multinational economic interests based in the United States have exerted extraordinary influence over the accord, inserting language that will arguably serve to damage Latin American interests.

Though the TPP has often been presented as a disinterested effort to stimulate basic economic growth and development in the Pacific Rim, the economic principles that underlay the TPP may instead serve to advance the interests of the world's leading corporations. US President Barack Obama promised in a statement that the TPP would slash over 18,000 foreign taxes that the US faces for its exports. Despite being heralded as a path to prosperity for developing countries, eliminating protectionist measures in countries like Chile, Perú, and Mexico could prove to be very harmful.

The great nineteenth century German economist Friedrich List argued that developed countries calling for expanded free trade in less developed countries is hypocritical as well as misleading. As List put it, "it is a very common clever device that when anyone has attained the summit of greatness, he kicks away the ladder by which he has climbed up, in order to deprive others of the means of climbing up after him."

Britain and the United States, which historically have been unflagging proponents of free trade for developing countries, both adopted free trade policies only after they were technologically advanced enough not to need protectionist policies. Britain adopted free trade in the mid-nineteenth century, while the United States eliminated its highly protectionist policies only in the early twentieth century. ................(more)

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/34322-bleak-prospects-for-latin-america-under-trans-pacific-partnership




2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bleak Prospects for Latin America Under Trans-Pacific Partnership (Original Post) marmar Jan 2016 OP
I would suggest a 19th century economist (1789 - 1846) might not be best source for 21st century. Hoyt Jan 2016 #1
Like that's the only argument in the piece...... marmar Jan 2016 #2
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. I would suggest a 19th century economist (1789 - 1846) might not be best source for 21st century.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jan 2016

I doubt Latin American countries would sign the TPP if they thought it against their best interests long-term.

marmar

(77,080 posts)
2. Like that's the only argument in the piece......
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:26 AM
Jan 2016

I love the smell of intellectual dishonesty in the morning.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Bleak Prospects for Latin...