Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 04:28 AM Nov 2015

The Bathtub Curve, Nuclear Safety, and Run-to-Failure

The NRC’s Operating Experience Branch issued a report on component failures from 2007 to 2011. More than 75% of the failures examined in this study involved components used longer than their recommended service lifetimes. The NRC’s report referred to it as being “run-to-failure.”

<snip>

Deliberately running safety components beyond service lifetimes until they fail is not only irresponsible, it is illegal. The NRC must not run away from its charter and obligation to protect public health and safety by failing to stop this lawbreaking nonsense.


Read the rest: http://allthingsnuclear.org/dlochbaum/the-bathtub-curve-nuclear-safety-and-run-to-failure

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Bathtub Curve, Nuclear Safety, and Run-to-Failure (Original Post) bananas Nov 2015 OP
The maintenance rule 10-CFR-50.56 has changed the designation Throckmorton Nov 2015 #1
Happy Thanksgiving, Throckmorton. nt bananas Nov 2015 #2

Throckmorton

(3,579 posts)
1. The maintenance rule 10-CFR-50.56 has changed the designation
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 07:50 AM
Nov 2015

It is now run to maintenance. What a farce.

After 28 years as a system engineer at a nuclear plant, I quit 2 years ago. Accident day is coming to US plant and I no longer wanted deal with it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Bathtub Curve, Nuclea...