Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 12:05 AM Nov 2015

Is Vladimir Putin right to label Turkey ‘accomplices of terrorists’?

[font size=3]Is Vladimir Putin right to label Turkey ‘accomplices of terrorists’? [/font]
The Guardian
Martin Chulov

The relationship hinted at by Russian leader after warplane was shot down is a complex one, and includes links between senior Isis figures and Turkish officials

**********************

Turkey’s international airports have also been busy. Many, if not most, of the estimated 15,000-20,000 foreign fighters to have joined Islamic State (Isis) have first flown into Istanbul or Adana, or arrived by ferry along its Mediterranean coast.

The influx has offered fertile ground to allies of Assad who, well before a Turkish jet shot down a Russian fighter on Tuesday, had enabled, or even supported Isis. Vladimir Putin’s reference to Turkey as “accomplices of terrorists” is likely to resonate even among some of Ankara’s backers.

From midway through 2012, when jihadis started to travel to Syria, their presence was apparent at all points of the journey to the border: at Istanbul airport, in the southern cities of Hatay and Gaziantep – both of which were staging points – and in the border villages. Foreigners on their way to fight remained fixtures on these routes until late in 2014 when, after continued pressure from the EU states and the US, coordinated efforts were made to turn them back.

By then, Isis had become a dominant presence in parts of north and east Syria. It had splintered non-ideological factions of the Syrian opposition as well as Islamist groups, both of which had been backed by Turkey, and ensured that whatever form of governance that emerged from Syria’s ruins would have little to do with the revolution’s original goals.

The steady stream of foreigners who passed through Hatay and Gaziantep made little effort to remain discreet, gathering regularly in local hotels, coffee shops and bus stations. European diplomats alarmed by the gathering threat concluded that the Turkish leadership was sympathetic to conservative Islamists travelling to fight Assad, who had, until his brutal response to pro-democracy demonstrations in 2011, been a friend of the Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. “After that he became an enemy,” said one western official. “Erdoğan had tried to mentor Assad. But after the crackdown [on demonstrations] he felt insulted by him. And we are where we are today.”

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/24/vladimir-putin-turkey-isis-terrorists-warplane-analysis

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Vladimir Putin right to label Turkey ‘accomplices of terrorists’? (Original Post) newthinking Nov 2015 OP
No jberryhill Nov 2015 #1
Did you read the article though? newthinking Nov 2015 #2
Yes jberryhill Nov 2015 #3
No. nt MADem Nov 2015 #4
Perhaps, but that's a sword with two edges. Chan790 Nov 2015 #5
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
1. No
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 12:12 AM
Nov 2015

Stay out of their airspace and there will be no problem.

Everyone agrees it was an overreaction, and everyone agrees the planes entered their airspace.

Also, don't touch hot stoves, and look both ways before you cross the street. Simple safety rules, and easy to understand.

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
2. Did you read the article though?
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 12:26 AM
Nov 2015

I agree they need to stay out of Turkey's airspace. But there is more to this than what is covered in the mainstream story. Apparently the reason they are conducting such exercises near the border is because that is a major traffic route for arms and men to ISIS and Turkey has been (at best) closing their eyes to it. This all is terribly messy.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
3. Yes
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 12:30 AM
Nov 2015

Virtually none of which has Jack to do with what happened today.

Turkey needs to ease off the hair trigger, and Russia needs to either ask permission or stay out.
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
5. Perhaps, but that's a sword with two edges.
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 05:36 AM
Nov 2015

Turkey is most likely if not actively an accomplice, being negligently passive about tamping down on what is happening in its own territory in terms of facilitating terrorism.

Russia has very little room to speak as it is propping up the regime of one of the globally-foremost state-sponsors of terrorism in Assad; a man known to have ties to and have worked as an intermediary for Iran and Hezbollah to engage in terrorism in and against both Lebanon and Israel as well as Turkey and the US.

There is no upstanding party in that conflict between Turkey and Russia. They're both doing awful things and then crying foul when caught.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Is Vladimir Putin right t...