Reaper Madness: Counterproductive Drone Wars
By Doug Noble
Source: Worldbeyondwar.org
November 10, 2015
Our entire Middle East policy seems to be based on firing drones, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told The Intercept. Theyre enamored by the ability of special operations and the CIA to find a guy in the middle of the desert in some shitty little village and drop a bomb on his head and kill him.
But its even worse. Careless execution and public distortion are one thing. If the US were in fact relying on a proven military technology and strategy to defeat terrorists and keep America safe, despite setbacks and innocent lives lost, there are those who could justify the cost.
But what is perhaps most insidious of all is the fact that many studies long available to military planners have shown decisively that the use of weaponized drones in counterinsurgency and counterterrorism efforts is both ineffective and counterproductive. Even more, the historical record and recent research shows quite clearly that the decapitation strategy driving such drone use the assassination of high value targets has itself been both unsuccessful and counterproductive in defeating insurgent or terrorist organizations.
So the drone warriors have known all along it wouldnt work: that killer drones and kill lists would slaughter thousands of civilians but never defeat terrorists. Theyve known this conclusively from decades of military experience and volumes of research studies. Yet they continue to do it anyway, ever more expansively, ever more mindlessly. Why? Because they can (and because they have no Plan B).
Full article: https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/reaper-madness-counterproductive-drone-wars/
enough
(13,259 posts)If it doesn't work, and they know it doesn't work, why do they keep doing it? It looks like bureaucratized warfare. Everybody gets to keep their job, nobody American gets hurt, and it's never going to stop.
The most obvious benefit is to the people who make and sell the machinery.
snip from the article>
Never mind that drone strikes multiply new enemies. The strategic plan of drone counterinsurgency now seems to be that an armada of killer drones is capable of eliminating new recruits as fast as they are created: as soon as a head grows back, cut it off, in a pattern of ongoing eradication.
end snip
polly7
(20,582 posts)Also a way to control whole areas of people using - unimaginable fear - without any self-risk. Absolutely no opposition to it.
My question is, when was 'War' declared on any of the countries having civilians murdered by foreign drones??
Demeter
(85,373 posts)I can't keep up with the cynicism, no matter how hard I try.