Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 12:12 PM Nov 2015

Reaper Madness: Counterproductive Drone Wars

By Doug Noble
Source: Worldbeyondwar.org
November 10, 2015

Our entire Middle East policy seems to be based on firing drones,” Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told The Intercept. “They’re enamored by the ability of special operations and the CIA to find a guy in the middle of the desert in some shitty little village and drop a bomb on his head and kill him.”

Now government documents leaked to the Intercept show conclusively that the US drone program kills thousands of innocents on bad intelligence and careless targeting while being falsely portrayed as a program of impeccable planning and precision execution. The recently leaked “Drone Papers” reveal the extent of willful ineptitude in US drone operations in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, which rely on systematically faulty intelligence and astonishing inaccuracies in identifying targets. These revelations only further confirm what many of us already knew about the appalling failure, relentless deception and criminal lethality of the US drone program.

But it’s even worse. Careless execution and public distortion are one thing. If the US were in fact relying on a proven military technology and strategy to defeat terrorists and “keep America safe,” despite setbacks and innocent lives lost, there are those who could justify the cost.

But what is perhaps most insidious of all is the fact that many studies long available to military planners have shown decisively that the use of weaponized drones in counterinsurgency and counterterrorism efforts is both ineffective and counterproductive. Even more, the historical record and recent research shows quite clearly that the “decapitation” strategy driving such drone use – the assassination of high value targets – has itself been both unsuccessful and counterproductive in defeating insurgent or terrorist organizations.

So the drone warriors have known all along it wouldn’t work: that killer drones and kill lists would slaughter thousands of civilians but never defeat terrorists. They’ve known this conclusively from decades of military experience and volumes of research studies. Yet they continue to do it anyway, ever more expansively, ever more mindlessly. Why? Because they can (and because they have no Plan B).


What I’ve tried to show here is something more: that these military miscreants have also known all along that their drone technology and targeting strategy are militarily bankrupt. They could not but be aware from military history and doctrine that these approaches have absolutely no possibility of defeating terrorist groups or keeping America safe. They must know that in fact the opposite is true, that their nefarious enterprise only further endangers us all. And yet they will continue ever more brazenly their Reaper madness, the scholars here all agree, until we find some way to stop them.


Full article: https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/reaper-madness-counterproductive-drone-wars/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reaper Madness: Counterproductive Drone Wars (Original Post) polly7 Nov 2015 OP
Excellent article. You have to wonder: who benefits? enough Nov 2015 #1
I hate it all so much, I believe only the MIC and weapons makers benefit. polly7 Nov 2015 #2
It makes great political hay, too Demeter Nov 2015 #3

enough

(13,259 posts)
1. Excellent article. You have to wonder: who benefits?
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 12:59 PM
Nov 2015

If it doesn't work, and they know it doesn't work, why do they keep doing it? It looks like bureaucratized warfare. Everybody gets to keep their job, nobody American gets hurt, and it's never going to stop.

The most obvious benefit is to the people who make and sell the machinery.

snip from the article>

Never mind that drone strikes multiply new enemies. The strategic plan of drone counterinsurgency now seems to be that an armada of killer drones is capable of eliminating new recruits as fast as they are created: “as soon as a head grows back, cut it off,” in a pattern of ongoing eradication.

end snip

polly7

(20,582 posts)
2. I hate it all so much, I believe only the MIC and weapons makers benefit.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 01:07 PM
Nov 2015

Also a way to control whole areas of people using - unimaginable fear - without any self-risk. Absolutely no opposition to it.

My question is, when was 'War' declared on any of the countries having civilians murdered by foreign drones??



 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
3. It makes great political hay, too
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 03:34 AM
Nov 2015

I can't keep up with the cynicism, no matter how hard I try.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Reaper Madness: Counterpr...