Dennis Ross: Critics Were Right About Obama, Iran And Israel
Dennis Ross, former senior adviser to President Obama, arguably should have come out strongly against the Iran deal and advised Hillary Clinton (he served in her husbands administration) that the administration was not leveling with the American people. His interview with the Times of Israel is revealing.
Remember that the president says the deal blocks Irans pathway to the bomb. No, says Ross: One of my main concerns is what happens after year 15, when they basically can have as large a program as they want, and the gap between threshold status and weapon status becomes very small. Well, at least the deal staved off trouble for the time being. Er, not exactly: The more you make it clear that for any misbehavior they pay a price, and its the kind of price that matters to them, the more likely they are to realize the firewall is real, and the less likely they are to ever test it. But the deal does not do that; to the contrary, it prevents graduated sanctions since imposition of any sanctions frees Iran from the deal. Sure, but Irans behavior in the meantime shows that it wont exploit the deal and pursue its own religious zealotry. Not at all: Were already seeing them ratchet it up in Syria. Everyone is focusing on what the Russians are doing, but Iran is adding significant numbers of Revolutionary Guard forces to the ground, its not just Hezbollah forces. I think this is a harbinger of things to come.
Too bad then that Ross did not unequivocally oppose the deal and urge Democrats to do the same. Now he is willing to admit it virtually guarantees that Iran will get a bomb; it has not specified means for imposing penalties without overthrowing the deal; and Irans behavior is worse than ever. That seems to be exactly what critics of the deal have said all along.
Ross also confirms Obama critics accusation that Obama is reflexively partial to the Palestinians. It tends to look at Israel through a lens that is more competitive, more combative, that sees Israel more in problematic terms, he explains. He adds that since Obama looks at the Palestinians as being weak, there is this reluctance to criticize them. Theyre too weak to criticize is what I say in the Obama chapter. And if they are too weak to criticize, they are too weak to be held accountable, too weak to be responsible. Theyre too weak to have a state. Well, if you want the Palestinians to have the responsibility of a state, you have to hold them responsible. In perhaps the most damning portion of his interview, Ross lets on that Obamas contrarianism toward the George W. Bush administration represented a deliberate attempt to alienate Israel:
When the president comes in, he thinks we have a major problem with Arabs and Muslims. And he sees that as a function of the Bush administration an image, fairly or not, that Bush was at war with Islam. So one of the ways that he wants to show that hes going to have an outreach to the Muslim world is that hes going to give this speech in Cairo. So he wants to reach out and show that the US is not so close to the Israelis, which he thinks also feeds this perception. Thats why theres an impulse to do some distancing from Israel, and thats why the settlement issue is seized in a way.
more...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/10/28/dennis-ross-critics-were-right-about-obama-iran-and-israel/
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Clinton or Bernie.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)(Always good to hear all sides of an Argument about such an important issue as Iran......but!)
From the Article:
Jennifer Rubin bwrites the Right Turn blog for The Post, offering reported opinion from a conservative perspective.