America’s post-9/11 Cassandras are still ignored
Fourteen years later, the horrors of 9/11 continue with deadly ripple effects. American militarism has become the dominant position of U.S. foreign policy, while other options remain banished to the sidelines. Yet from the outset of the war on terrorism, some Americans spoke out against a militarized response to the terrible events on Sept. 11, 2001.
Conventional wisdom presents the war on terrorism proclaimed by President George W. Bush and maintained under President Barack Obama as the only practical response to 9/11. Fighting terrorism has been the main rationale for all U.S. military interventions since then, spinning the Pentagons machinery into overdrive despite the absence of clearly identified foes or geographical boundaries.
Even the most prominent warnings against such an approach were marginalized and vilified in the wake of Sept. 11. And those warnings have been buried by the U.S. media as though they never occurred, even though their concerns have proved prescient. The U.S. has spent trillions of dollars on military interventions across the Middle East, and yet the region is more violent and turbulent than ever.
This media amnesia helps keep the U.S. war train on track. The importance of the erasure is embodied in an observation by George Orwell, Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past. The widespread pretense that there was no credible critique of going to war 14 years ago reinforces the assumption that there is no credible alternative to militarized responses today.
http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/9/americas-post-911-cassandras-are-still-ignored.html
KoKo
(84,711 posts)So much disinfo noise and the endless election campaigns ...while national reflection and discussion of policy revisions are drowned out in the MSM by the MIC's special interests.
dougolat
(716 posts)The rest are still at it.
Pedal to the metal, in some cases.