Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 02:11 AM Sep 2015

Students Bombed the SAT This Year, in Four Charts; Scores on the reading were the worst in decades..

September 3, 2015 — 1:10 AM EDT

This year's high school graduates did worse on the SAT than their peers last year. And there's more bad news for the College Board, which administers the test: Fewer people are taking the SAT than are taking the ACT, its top competitor.

Students in the high school class of 2015 turned in the lowest critical reading score on the SAT college entrance exam in more than 40 years, with all three sections declining from the previous year. Meanwhile, ACT Inc. reported that nearly 60 percent of all 2015 high school graduates took the ACT, up from 49 percent in 2011.



The mean score on the math portion of the SAT, 511, is the lowest since 1999. The highest possible score on each section is 800. The reading score of 495 is the worst since 1972, according to data provided by the College Board. The test administrator reported the lowest score for the SAT's writing section since it began in 2005.



The number of high school graduates who took the SAT reached an all-time high of almost 1.7 million this year. However, that lags the rival ACT by more than 225,000. The SAT is being revised, with the first administration next March. The new test will be similar to the ACT, as penalties will be eliminated for wrong answers and it will have an optional writing test.



ACT Inc. also delivered gloomy news about the preparedness of the next generation of college students. The company measured how many students were ready for college based on their scores on the ACT this year. It determines readiness by looking at the share of test takers who scored above a certain benchmark, which the company says will give a student a 75 percent chance of earning a C or above in a corresponding college course.

more...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-03/students-bombed-the-sat-this-year-in-four-charts

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Students Bombed the SAT This Year, in Four Charts; Scores on the reading were the worst in decades.. (Original Post) Purveyor Sep 2015 OP
Well it looks like the republican/libertarian fevered wet dream. Half-Century Man Sep 2015 #1
+1 tecelote Sep 2015 #4
Workers to make $ .50 per hour. Need to be competitive with a China! Oneironaut Sep 2015 #7
Semi-literate serfs. silverweb Sep 2015 #2
Looks like NO Child Left Behind has failed. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #3
Also, reading from screens instead of books doesn't help them, DirtyHippyBastard Sep 2015 #5
^^^ this flamingdem Sep 2015 #11
Seems about right. seabeckind Sep 2015 #6
I guess this answers the does social media promote verbal competence question, huh?` 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2015 #8
? r u saying? flamingdem Sep 2015 #12
IDK ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2015 #13
"bad math"? it's surged roughly as hard as the reading/writing parts have fallen MisterP Sep 2015 #9
Schoolchildren are hungry, stressed and tired AwakeAtLast Sep 2015 #10

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
1. Well it looks like the republican/libertarian fevered wet dream.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 02:22 AM
Sep 2015

Of a worker class crippled by lack of opportunity is finally coming together.
Kill the schools, kill the poverty escape mechanism. More money for the ones who need none.

Oneironaut

(5,530 posts)
7. Workers to make $ .50 per hour. Need to be competitive with a China!
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 07:05 AM
Sep 2015

The right wing meme is something like that.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
2. Semi-literate serfs.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 02:31 AM
Sep 2015

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Just what the "lords" of the oligarchy want.


[font color="purple"]Go, Bernie!
Ride the purple wave and join The Purple Revolution!

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
3. Looks like NO Child Left Behind has failed.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 03:30 AM
Sep 2015

I wonder how the scores from charters measured up against those from private schools and from public schools.

DirtyHippyBastard

(217 posts)
5. Also, reading from screens instead of books doesn't help them,
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 05:29 AM
Sep 2015

and I think most of the youngsters prefer their do-hickeys to books.
"evidence from laboratory experiments, polls and consumer reports indicates that modern screens and e-readers fail to adequately recreate certain tactile experiences of reading on paper that many people miss and, more importantly, prevent people from navigating long texts in an intuitive and satisfying way. In turn, such navigational difficulties may subtly inhibit reading comprehension. Compared with paper, screens may also drain more of our mental resources while we are reading and make it a little harder to remember what we read when we are done."

from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
6. Seems about right.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 07:04 AM
Sep 2015

So, how long has it been since the educators determined curriculum and methods?

And not politicians and profiteers?

AwakeAtLast

(14,134 posts)
10. Schoolchildren are hungry, stressed and tired
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:54 PM
Sep 2015

The disaster of the Bush years have created conditions that have been especially hard on our youngest citizens.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Students Bombed the SAT T...