Why is the Obama Administration Suddenly Fixated on Stomping out Medical Pot?
AlterNet / By Paul Armentano
Why is the Obama Administration Suddenly Fixated on Stomping out Medical Pot?
At the same time public support for marijuana legalization reached record highs, Obama shifted from one time medicinal cannabis sympathizer to White House weed-whacker.
February 8, 2012 |
Broken promises are nothing new in Washington, DC. Yet even by the Beltways jaded standards, President Obamas role reversal from one time medicinal cannabis sympathizer to White House weed-whacker is remarkable.
Indeed, the man who once pledged on the campaign trail that he was not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue, has since taking the Presidential oaths of office done virtually everything in his administrations power to do precisely that. Yet he's taken these steps at the very time that a record number of Americans, including 57 percent of democrats and a whopping 69 percent of self-described liberals, endorse doing just the opposite. Nonetheless, in recent months, the Obama administration via a virtual alphabet soup of federal agencies has launched an unprecedented series of attacks against medical cannabis patients, providers, and in some cases even their advocates.
To review:
-- Deputy Attorney General James Cole, along with the four US Attorneys from California, has ramped up federal efforts to close or displace several hundreds of medical cannabis providers in California. Their tactics have included: raiding specific dispensaries and prosecuting their owners; filing civil forfeiture proceedings against landlords who rent their property to medical marijuana providers; threatening to federally prosecute newspapers and radio stations who accept ad revenue from medical cannabis operations; and, most recently, intimidating local lawmakers who have either enacted or are publicly supportive of cannabis oversight regulations. Speaking with radio station KQED San Francisco last month, Tommy LaNier Director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy's National Marijuana Initiative boasted about the administrations efforts to strong-arm local officials, stating " We) have ... advised those places where they're trying to regulate marijuana -- which is illegal under the Control Substances Act -- (that) they cannot do that. ..............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/drugs/154070/why_is_the_obama_administration_suddenly_fixated_on_stomping_out_medical_pot/
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)By appearing to hate pot smokers Obama is making the tea baggers love them so the baggers'll vote for legalizing the herb.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)How can congressional repubs vote for the drug wars if Obama supports them? He should offer to have the House leadership join him in making a strong statement against Pot!
patrice
(47,992 posts)think
(11,641 posts)And the proctologist said "Cough"....
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)It's been more than a year since they started their crusade. I see two possible reasons:
1. Trying to garner a few more votes from the far right
2. Trying to show that Holder can actually do something
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)3. Doing the bidding of BIG PHARMA (who can't patent Mother Nature - yet) -- and in order to gain larger campaign contributions.
4. Doing the bidding of the LIQUOR LOBBY (who is afraid of the competition) -- and in order to gain larger campaign contributions.
5. Doing the bidding of the PRIVATE PRISON INDUSTRY (to avoid the inevitable decrease in the prisoner population by decriminalizing weed) -- and in order to gain larger campaign contributions.
6. Doing the bidding of the BIG BANKING (who launder the money for criminals such as the CIA, et.al., who then use said money to fund their black projects) -- and in order to gain larger campaign contributions.
Censor-Ready
(17 posts)Thanks DeSwiss. Obama couldn't have said it better himself.
a2liberal
(1,524 posts)xiamiam
(4,906 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)there were several stories in the news recently about a new cannabis drug being developed for commercial sale very soon by the big drug companies.
TBF
(32,062 posts)but when big pharma figures out how to patent it (which will likely be through devices as opposed to the actual weed) I'm guessing we'll see a very fast turn-around to market. You know they want those profits ...
on point
(2,506 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)thing that he is. Yeah, the GOP will rush to his side if he just opposes pot and marriage equality! That's what he thinks. Still. Slow on the uptake in some personal areas, this President. Thinks the GOP sill might like him.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)Gotta meet the expectations of Big Pharma supporters, ya'll. Given the diverse sources of medical weed, the profit margin for the Big Pharma corporatists would be mightly slim...
Uncle Joe
(58,364 posts)in regards to prosecuting the torture and war crimes of the previous administration.
Thanks for the thread, marmar.
patrice
(47,992 posts)throw them into the deep-end of the swimming pool.
Necessity IS the mother of invention.
Challenge winnows out the light-weights and makes the remainder muscular.
One of the best ways to learn is to make mistakes.
Assessment precedes strategy.
.....................................................
Of course, I have no idea if any of these are relevant, so, from my limited-info perspective, the possibility that they are is equal to the possibility that they aren't. The same might be said higher-up in the food chain, so what will happen will depend upon what happens.
patrice
(47,992 posts)Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)when Big Pharma is allowed to sell its over-priced, over regulated Sativex, and future products. Its all about the money.
iscooterliberally
(2,860 posts)When they passed the controlled substances act and created the DEA it was the perfect excuse
to violate the 4th ammendment rights of American citizens. Now you can't tell the difference between
local law enforcement and soldiers fighting overseas. Too many corporations and governement agencies
are making money hand over fist to just let this go. It's government by the money, and for the money.
People no longer count. We think slavery ended a long time ago, but in reality it never left us. This isn't about
drugs. It's all about the power and the money. We should do everything that we can to vote against prohibitionists
in every level of our government.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)once someone or some entity has power in some way - they don't relinquish it easily.
Sometimes they have to be forced to do the right thing. I'd rather spend taxpayer money on jobs with dignity, not prison jobs and the forced labor within.
byronius
(7,395 posts)-- who is trying to destroy Obama's base in California.
If so, this article helps him enormously. I do not believe Obama directly controls the US Attorneys as Bush did, having chosen instead to return to the standard practice of autonomy. This is a good thing, unless a Bush-appointed rogue who Obama allowed to remain in his position is now using Obama's sense of justice against him. I.e., Cole.
Theoretically, Cole is only closing dispensaries near schools. In practice, right-wing communities are being emboldened by Cole's efforts to decertify every dispensary in their jurisdiction, which is ironically quite stupid, since the blue districts then get the flood of cash that used to fill the coffers of the red districts. Sacramento is surviving only because of this money.
I don't think Obama is involved in this at all, but I do think his sense of fairness plays into the hands of the sociopathic criminals that are the Republican Party.
Festivito
(13,452 posts)CIA cannot pad their future inheritances without the drug money funding their operations.
Otherwise 6 and 13 have it right.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)http://www.ednewscolorado.org/2012/02/06/32744-commentary-medical-marijuana-industry-welcome-regulation
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/health/story/2012-01-29/pot-based-prescription-drug/52826376/1
libodem
(19,288 posts)Sharp crowd.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)After all MJ is illegal according to the federal government.
It is an interesting question as to which laws the government chooses to enforce.
Ultimately if we don't want to be harassed by the government, we've got to do something to change the laws.
webDude
(875 posts)Mopar151
(9,983 posts)The righties will respond to any effort by this administration to legalize pot, whether medical or recreational, as pandering to "the dirty hippies".
Many on the right, and more than a few on the left, compare pot to hard liquor or heroin interms of long-term physical effects, and they can't conceive of a high different that booze, or pain releif more effective than whacking doses of Oxy.
Potheads know that legal recreational pot users will turn into the herbal equivalent of wine snobs. "Hey Joe, you wanna come over for the Sunday night game? I just got a nice bud of Vermont Purple, and Lisa's makin' nachos!"
Drug Warriors still think legal weed will turn us into slavering wretches, worse than those addicted to Night Train or nicotine.
And, finally that the Prez has to walk a fine line here, because of the disproportionate response involved. Teabaggeers and fundies will be bleating about "The Lost Children" and "Defending Youth from Drugs in the Schools", and Limbaugh will be calling Obama "America's #1 Pusher". Any voices of reason will be shouted down from multiple directions.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)...in the states that allow it. And pretty much in every case, theres been a reason for it, whether it be the state requesting that these particular operations be shut down or because the operation wasn't following certain regulations.
Go look at the number of dispensaries that actually exist and continue to run untouched compared to the number they've actually shut down and then try to make an argument that theres some "obsession" here. Thats just absolute bullshit and its an argument that completely falls apart in the face of the sheer mathematics involved.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)in Cayman Islands accounts, courtesy pharmaceutical lobby.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)in Cayman Islands accounts, courtesy pharmaceutical lobby.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)wish our elected leaders would do the same