The academic universe is indifferent to WikiLeaks
As the hard-working staff here at Spoiler Alerts continue its slow segue back from vacation, lets focus on a relatively easy topic: the alleged hand-in-glove relationship between the U.S. State Department, the International Studies Association [ISA] and American academics.
Let me explain: Earlier this month WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange gave an interview to Germanys Der Spiegel in which he lamented over the failure of academics to exploit WikiLeaks release of U.S. diplomatic cables to the fullest:
I worry most about academia and the particular part of academia that is dealing with international relations. WikiLeaks has published over 2 million diplomatic cables. It is the single largest repository for international relations of primary source materials, all searchable. It is the cannon for international relations. It is the biggest dog in the room. There has been some research published in Spanish and in Asian languages. But where are the American and English journals? There is a concrete explanation: They act as feeder schools for the US State Department. The US association that controls the big five international relations journals, the ISA, has a quiet, official policy of not accepting any paper that is derived from WikiLeaks materials.
Now this last allegation is a blatant falsehood. The executive director of the International Studies Association flatly denied Assanges claims, as Ben Norton reported on his blog, Furthermore, Norton discovered at least a few articles in ISA journals that have cited the WikiLeaks cables.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/07/30/the-academic-universe-is-indifferent-to-wikileaks/