Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

swag

(26,487 posts)
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 03:23 PM Jul 2015

Hillary Clinton gets less Wall Street money than you think

http://www.vox.com/2015/7/29/9040091/hillary-clinton-wall-street

One of the most persistent knocks on Hillary Clinton is that she's too close to Wall Street and Washington's K Street lobbying industry.

It's true that Clinton, a former New York senator, has strong ties to the titans of finance: Big banks and investors are generous donors to the Clinton Foundation; they've given to this campaign and Clinton's past bids; and some of Clinton's closest allies in politics have been through the revolving door between Washington and Wall Street. Similarly, many Clinton backers, including some former aides to her and her husband, lobby for a living.

But a close look at Clinton's first campaign finance report of the 2016 presidential campaign shows that she raised $46 million with limited backing from the nation's top financial institutions and lobbying firms.

Instead, as her campaign has long maintained, Clinton's war chest is being stocked by a wide base of supporters. The richest sources of cash for her include federal workers, lawyers, media company employees, Hollywood agents, and California state workers — and,
yes, a handful of Wall Street investment houses and prominent Washington lobbying firms.

. . . more
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton gets less Wall Street money than you think (Original Post) swag Jul 2015 OP
How much has she received in speaking fees from Wall Street firms? n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2015 #1
For her campaign? DURHAM D Jul 2015 #2
Prior to the official announcement of her campaign. n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2015 #4
Oh, you mean for the Foundation. DURHAM D Jul 2015 #7
nope. The bribes. DFL_Wellstone_dems Jul 2015 #11
Darn Darn Darn DURHAM D Jul 2015 #12
That's by far the the most childish response I've ever received. Sad that I won't have the pleasure. DFL_Wellstone_dems Jul 2015 #13
LOL DURHAM D Jul 2015 #14
yep. DFL_Wellstone_dems Jul 2015 #15
I don't know ... Do you? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #5
Very good article. Thanks for posting. nt DURHAM D Jul 2015 #3
And WAAAAAAY more than I'm comfortable with Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #6
Would you prefer she finance the campaign DURHAM D Jul 2015 #8
I'd prefer she step aside. Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #9
It wouldn't matter to this bunch of Hillary haters if she didn't take a dime. Lil Missy Jul 2015 #10
 
11. nope. The bribes.
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 06:22 PM
Jul 2015

It's a common dodge. Clinton's defenders always try to conflate the money paid for speeches with money paid to the foundation.

Some money does go to the foundation...after she gets paid.

"Clinton has given paid speeches at eight universities, four of them public institutions. In those instances, she has said, she donated her fees to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, the family's non-profit philanthropic organization. The Buffalo contract stipulates that the "net honorarium" go to the Clinton Foundation, but only after the "full contract fee" of $275,000 was paid to the Harry Walker Agency."

Full article
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/07/16/university-at-buffalo-paid-275000-for-hillary-clinton-speech/

For more...
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/hillary-clintons-goldman-sachs-problem

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/31/hillary-clinton-speeches-keystone_n_7463108.html

And for the grand finale (forgive the politico link, but nobody else covered it)
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/hillary-clinton-speech-carlyle-group-95763.html

For those that don't know the Carlyle group...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlyle_Group

They are the closest thing to a Bond villain that you can find and they've put at least 200,000 dollars in Hillary Clinton's pocket.

Hillary Clinton is NOT a dynamic public speaker. So it seems odd that wall street would want to hear her speak enough to pay millions of dollars (400,000 just from Goldman Sachs) to hear her speak. They like their entertainment a little more lively...
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/02/i-crashed-a-wall-street-secret-society.html

For a final perspective from a notorious right wing writer writing for an ethically questionable paper...
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/24/hillary-clinton-income-inequality-2016-election

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
12. Darn Darn Darn
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jul 2015

I was a little confused at first but then I remembered ... girls are not supposed to be listened to much less make money, especially from talking. Jealousy? Sexism? Both !

Enjoy your stay. Will be skipping the rest of your posts.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
10. It wouldn't matter to this bunch of Hillary haters if she didn't take a dime.
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 04:05 PM
Jul 2015

They'd find another reason to hate.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Hillary Clinton gets less...