Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Deal That Saved Detroit (And Banned Strikes)
http://www.thenation.com/blog/166031/deal-saved-detroit-and-banned-strikesPresident Obama is, as AP puts it, "wearing his decision to rescue General Motors and Chrysler three years ago as a badge of honor" on his reelection campaign. It saved jobs and working communities, brought the US auto industry back from the brink. In January, U.S. auto sales were up eleven percent over a year ago, and a proud president was cooing to the college students of Ann Arbor, Michigan:
"The American auto industry was on the verge of collapse and some politicians were willing to let it just die. We said no We believe in the workers of this state."
You're going to be hearing a lot about the deal that saved Detroit in the next few months, not least because likely opponent Mitt Romney was against it. Then Governor Romney wrote in the fall of 2008 that if the big three auto companies received a bailout "we can kiss the American auto industry goodbye." Romney bad; Obama good; Big Three back. The Deal with Detroit is gold dust for Democrats. Reality is a bit more complicated.
For one thing, it was Republican President Bush, not the Democrats Barack Obama, who originally decided not to stand by as the auto makers died. The deal saved an industry US cars are still being made in the US -- but it came at such a high price that in many ways it's a whole new industry. The American auto industry that built middle class lives as well as cars -- that one we kissed good-bye, and it may be a while before we see it back again.
To review: in the fall of 2008, President George W Bush announced a $17.billion loan, split into $13.4 billion at once and another $4 billion in February. The billions for Detroit were tied tight with all the string that had not been attached to the trillions simply given away to Wall St. The Treasury never forced the financial industry to hand over majority shareholder control in exchange for access to the Troubled Asset Relief Program. No CEO of AIG or Bank of America or Well Fargo had to shrink a wage or skimp on a pension. (Far from it, the Government Accountability Office found that the "standard agreement between Treasury and the participating institutions does not require that these institutions track or report how they plan to use, or do use, their capital investments."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1029 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Deal That Saved Detroit (And Banned Strikes) (Original Post)
xchrom
Feb 2012
OP
tabatha
(18,795 posts)1. The loan that Bush made was just to kick the can down the road.
It did not do much.
Laura Flanders should do her homework better.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)2. Yeah, it's a poorly written history
The executives were gone. Union was protected in many ways. And Bush didn't really do much at all. He virtually admitted he did just enough to stick the next guy with the problem.
I wasn't a huge fan of all parts of the agreement, but even the unions saw the fix everyone was in. It was one of the better things Obama did, even if it was far from perfect.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)3. this would be the basis for a good question for debates in general election
I don't think Obama or Romney would have an adequate answer for this, except that Romney wouldn't have helped Detroit at all.