The Dangerous Candidacy of Scott Walker - The New Yorker
Lets stipulate up front that Scott Walker, the governor of Wisconsin, is an odious politician whose ascension to the Presidency would be a disaster.
Set aside, for a moment, his repeated refusal, in the past few days, to say whether he believes that President Obama loves America, or whether he believes that the President is a Christian, and look instead at Walkers record running what used to be one of Americas more progressive states. Having cut taxes for the wealthy and stripped many of Wisconsins public-sector unions of their collective-bargaining rights, he is now preparing to sign a legislative bill that would cripple unions in the private sector. Many wealthy conservatives, such as the Koch brothers, who have funnelled a lot of money to groups supporting Walker, regard him as someone whos turning his state into a showcase for what they want the rest of America to look like.
But just how threatening is he? If youve been following the political news during the past week, you may well have the impression that hes stumbling in his campaign for the 2016 G.O.P. nomination. Among the political commentariat, the consensus of opinion is that Walkers repeated refusal to distance himself from Rudy Giulianis incendiary comments about Obama, and his subsequent encounter with the Washington Posts Dan Balz and Robert Costa, during which he appeared to question Obamas religious faith and took some shots at the media for asking him silly questions, werent merely reprehensible: they were serious gaffes that raised questions about Walkers political abilities.
It wasnt just liberal columnists who piled on. In a column at the Daily Beast, Matt Lewis, who also writes for the Daily Caller, said that Walkers comments raised the question of whether he might not be ready for prime time on the national stage. Lewis went on: Conservatives should be worried that Walker hasnt proven capable of navigating these land mines. MSNBCs Joe Scarborough, who is a former G.O.P. congressman, wrote at Politico: Good candidates know how to make dumb questions look, well, dumb.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/dangerous-candidacy-scott-walker
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)I can't even imagine that beady-eye nimcompoop as President.
He keeps winning elections that everyone says he'll lose. And his ventriloquists have very deep pockets.
underpants
(182,903 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)He won 3 elections in 4 years which could have been fraud but to non political types it could look good. He doesn't have a degree well neither does 69 percent of Americans. He is not appear scary like the other Republicans even though he is worse then most. We have to find a personal scandal to make stick. I don't want him near the nomination. We should NOT underestimate him.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)where we see the constant excuse "Well, of course it didn't work-- we didn't do it enough."
At least Brownback and some of the others are getting pushback, but while we have a good idea what';s wrong with Kansas, wtf did they put in the water in Wisconsin?