Reagan’s Ambassador to Moscow Speaks on Ukraine
https://nuclearrisk.wordpress.com/2015/02/18/reagans-ambassador-to-moscow-speaks-on-ukraine/
Reagans Ambassador to Moscow Speaks on Ukraine
Posted on February 18, 2015
Over the last year, this blog has presented significant evidence that the prevailing Western view of the Ukrainian crisis has major blind spots which are prolonging the human suffering in that nation, and which also increase the risk of a nuclear disaster. Ronald Reagans Ambassador to Moscow, Jack Matlock, has been a valuable resource in my efforts, so I was pleased to see an article in
The Nation which reported on a major address he gave last Wednesday. Here are some key excerpts (emphasis added):
Something is amiss, according to the ambassador, when heretofore serious voices in Washington believe that arming Kiev is a relatively consequence-free policy choice because they insist on viewing Russia as a regional power. To Matlocks way of thinking, this is an error of the first order. No one with ICBMs is a regional power, not by any means.
Matlock stressed that his positionthat the United States needs to find a modus vivendi with Russia in spite of the crisis in Ukraineis not driven by any animus towards the Ukrainians, far from it. I respect and know Ukraine; I know it, its people and its literature, but we in the West and in the United States in particular need to understand that for Russia, Ukraine is of existential importance.
According to the ambassador, who was present at some of the most pivotal discussions between President Reagan and General Secretary Gorbachev during the Cold Wars denouement, the taproot of the current crisis is NATO expansion.
Bushs promise [to Gorbachev] not to expand the alliance eastward in exchange for the peaceful and orderly withdrawal of Soviet occupying troops in Eastern Europe was, according to Matlock, repeated by nearly all of the alliance members at the time.
I had not seen coverage of Ambassador Matlocks speech in my daily reading of both the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, and a web search found no coverage from them on line as well. The same was true for the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. This bias on the part of our media results in a dangerous blind spot in our perspective on the Ukrainian crisis.
<snip>