Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,316 posts)
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 02:13 PM Dec 2014

No improvement 25 years after Montreal Massacre


No improvement 25 years after Montreal Massacre: Porter




A quarter century after Marc Lepine killed 14 women at the École Polytechnique, women are still being killed and abused in alarming numbers.
. . . . .

“The War Against Women” was Parliament’s nod of agreement, one and a half years later. It was the title of a House subcommittee report. “We worried the title was so provocative, people would dismiss it,” recalls Dawn Black, a former NDP MP who sat on the subcommittee, which wrote the report after five months of hearing about the torture, murder, rape, poverty and struggles of women across Canada. “But we felt in the end, the reality demanded we recognize the deep and unacknowledged violence against women in our society.”


The 69-page report was filled with statistics the committee dutifully collected to support the war analogy. Many are maddeningly familiar:
One in 10 women were assaulted — physically or sexually — by their partner every year.
In 1989, 48 per cent of Canadians personally knew a woman being abused by her live-in partner.
In a recent study, 80 per cent of aboriginal women in Ontario said they’d been assaulted or abused.
One in four women had been sexually assaulted, half of them before they turned 17.

The committee quoted one rape crisis worker’s comparison of battered women shelters and rape crisis centres to unfunded, unrecognized Red Cross units in this war against women. Some of the 25 recommendations it made sought to bolster those facilities and to sensitize judges, Crown attorneys, police officers and others to the grave nature of the crimes.

What made the document radical, though, was its brief examination of the root causes of the war. Violence, it said, stemmed from inequality and traditional values that held men as the bosses and women as the servants. To end the war would require no less than a complete restructuring of society, in body and soul. The committee called for massive media campaigns, mandatory public school courses, more women in positions of power, notably in government (it called for gender-sensitivity training for MPs, ha!), and a national plan to build affordable housing “inextricably linked to wife assault,” since women who escaped their abusive husbands arrived at shelters with no money, no job prospects and no hope of paying rent. Poverty pushed many back to their abusers.

. . . .

http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2014/12/06/porter_no_improvement_25_years_after_montreal_massacre.html
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No improvement 25 years after Montreal Massacre (Original Post) niyad Dec 2014 OP
kicking. Why does widespread violence against women never spur mass outrage? n/t BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2014 #1
because women don't count. niyad Dec 2014 #3
this may sound pretty UN-PC, but BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2014 #6
as witness what happened to the suffragists fighting for women's right to vote just in this country. niyad Dec 2014 #7
prior to that, women had been a strong voice for abolition. BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2014 #8
if I had a more encouraging perspective, I would share it with you. sadly, I am beyond jaded. niyad Dec 2014 #9
heh.. BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2014 #12
Because it was so much more freeing when women wore this to the beach: polly7 Dec 2014 #10
nope, sorry. I'm not buying the words you're putting in my mouth. BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2014 #11
Kicking. love_katz Dec 2014 #2
thank you for your kind words. niyad Dec 2014 #4
. . . niyad Dec 2014 #5
. . . niyad Dec 2014 #13

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
6. this may sound pretty UN-PC, but
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 01:28 PM
Dec 2014

I've thought many times that women don't get massive protests and support for our issues because we DON'T scare people.

We don't have the Might Makes Right thing going for us. We don't fight back much, we don't riot, we put other people's concerns before our own. We don't unite en masse and make scary, aggressive scenes for our cause.
Sheesh, we (some of us) take our clothes off publicly, thinking that brings support for our cause, forfucksake.

It's the easiest thing in the world for bigger, stronger, louder people to act out their "issues" on us.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
8. prior to that, women had been a strong voice for abolition.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 02:45 PM
Dec 2014

We've thrown ourselves into many a cause, but.....

Few of the men we've supported give back the effort.

Maybe I'm jaded? If I need a more encouraging perspective, I'm open to it.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
10. Because it was so much more freeing when women wore this to the beach:
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 12:02 AM
Dec 2014

Because showing breasts that exist to feed babies is so much more a nasty, sexual thing than those curvaceous, lust-inducing legs at the time meant to actually walk with.

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

We've come a long way ...... (some of us, anyway - except for those horrible FEMEN women. I can't even imagine what those brave women who first dared to showed that much leg must have been called.)

Women do fight back all over the world, (including women who dare to show their breasts to make a point), we don't have to riot, and yes ....... many of us do put other's concerns before our own. But, that does not make most of us doormats, and I and the majority of my friends have never had to leave home every morning feeling fearful, downtrodden or less than any man around us. Absolutely, there are many issues to work on but blaming any lack of progress on what we burden ourselves with as being weaker, quieter and 'smaller' doesn't do anyone any favours.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
11. nope, sorry. I'm not buying the words you're putting in my mouth.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 12:12 AM
Dec 2014

I don't feel you accurately reflected my perspective nor my priorities.

love_katz

(2,579 posts)
2. Kicking.
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 07:29 PM
Dec 2014

Too many refuse to acknowledge that misogyny and patriarchy are used as justifications for greed, cruelty and violence, power over, and destruction of the Earth's life support systems.

Niyad:

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»No improvement 25 years a...