Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,929 posts)
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 01:40 AM Dec 2014

Immigration Expert Blasts Wash. Post's Defense Of Faulty Fact Check.

Editorial And Reporting Called "Breathtakingly Short On Both Facts And Logic"

The Washington Post editorial board is contesting the Obama administration's claim that his recent executive action on immigration is similar in scope to former President George H.W. Bush's temporary administrative relief for undocumented immigrants in 1990, which reportedly affected 1.5 million family members of legalization applicants. Calling the White House's 1.5 million figure "indefensible," the editorial also repeated the accusations of its fact checker, Glenn Kessler, who previously insisted that the figure is inflated despite contemporaneous congressional testimony to the contrary.

But now a leading immigration expert says the Post is "doubling down on a grievous error."

According to Charles Kamasaki, Executive Vice President of the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), author of a forthcoming book on the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 and its subsequent effects, and one of the leading experts on immigration law and policy in the country, the White House's citation of the 1.5 million estimate of those who stood to benefit from Bush's 1990 action is "completely defensible."

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/12/04/immigration-expert-blasts-wash-posts-defense-of/201771

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Immigration Expert Blasts...