Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The nuclear industry’s game plan: kill the competition and fleece the ratepayers
http://safeenergy.org/2014/09/25/the-nuclear-industrys-game-plan/
The nuclear industrys game plan: kill the competition and fleece the ratepayers
Michael Mariotte
September 24, 2014
What was that we said just two days ago? Now that the climate march is over, the real work begins .
The past two days have demonstrated, in almost shocking fashion, the immutable truth of that statement. The nuclear industry, especially the nations largest nuclear utility Exelon, is laying down the gauntlet and acknowledging its game planwhich is following just about exactly the scenario a NIRS paper published last week described.
At a hearing before the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) on Tuesday, Exelon finally revealed the bribe it wants the state to approve in order to keep Exelons unprofitable reactors running: a rate increase that would add $580 million per year to Exelons coffers.
That amounts to a stunning 8% rate increase for northern Illinois ratepayers just to keep five currently unprofitable reactors operating. For southern Illinois ratepayers, whose rates are lower than those upstate, the percentage increase would be even higher.
<snip>
But its not just Illinois at issue here. Exelons Barron also again went after the production tax credit (PTC) for new wind power (even though new nuclear power has a similar production tax credit; the problem is that few want to build new reactors). Low-cost (and clean) wind power in the Midwest is a major reason Exelons reactors are uneconomicthey cant compete with that growing renewable energy source. And the gap is likely to continue to grow, not just in Illinois but across the countrywhich is why Exelon wants to kill the PTC everywhere, and not just for wind but solar power as well.
<snip>
The reality is that until a few years ago, renewables were still expensive. But for decades, advocates predicted that as the technology became better and mass production was achieved, their prices would plummet. And thats exactly what has happened. As the graphic to the right indicates, the U.S. Department of Energy this week reported that solar power costs dropped 14% per year from 2009-2013, and continue to fall.
<snip>
In short, if the nuclear/coal utilities win, the climate loses. It really comes down to being that simple.
Thats the message of NIRS new paper, written by executive director Tim Judson. Titled Killing the Competition: The Nuclear Power Agenda to block climate action, stop renewable energy, and subsidize old reactors, the paper details this industry game plan. It is essential reading for every clean energy activist as we move to the type of battles described above in every state as the nuclear industry flails about to save itself from its own shortcomings and as every state must address its carbon footprint under the EPAs proposal, which will be finalized early next year. Download it here.
Comments on the EPAs proposal have been extended until December 1, 2014. You can tell the EPA to take all support for nuclear power out of the proposal here. Please do, and please ask your friends, colleagues, e-mail lists, congregations and any group you are involved with to do the same.
The nuclear industrys game plan: kill the competition and fleece the ratepayers
Michael Mariotte
September 24, 2014
What was that we said just two days ago? Now that the climate march is over, the real work begins .
The past two days have demonstrated, in almost shocking fashion, the immutable truth of that statement. The nuclear industry, especially the nations largest nuclear utility Exelon, is laying down the gauntlet and acknowledging its game planwhich is following just about exactly the scenario a NIRS paper published last week described.
At a hearing before the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) on Tuesday, Exelon finally revealed the bribe it wants the state to approve in order to keep Exelons unprofitable reactors running: a rate increase that would add $580 million per year to Exelons coffers.
That amounts to a stunning 8% rate increase for northern Illinois ratepayers just to keep five currently unprofitable reactors operating. For southern Illinois ratepayers, whose rates are lower than those upstate, the percentage increase would be even higher.
<snip>
But its not just Illinois at issue here. Exelons Barron also again went after the production tax credit (PTC) for new wind power (even though new nuclear power has a similar production tax credit; the problem is that few want to build new reactors). Low-cost (and clean) wind power in the Midwest is a major reason Exelons reactors are uneconomicthey cant compete with that growing renewable energy source. And the gap is likely to continue to grow, not just in Illinois but across the countrywhich is why Exelon wants to kill the PTC everywhere, and not just for wind but solar power as well.
<snip>
The reality is that until a few years ago, renewables were still expensive. But for decades, advocates predicted that as the technology became better and mass production was achieved, their prices would plummet. And thats exactly what has happened. As the graphic to the right indicates, the U.S. Department of Energy this week reported that solar power costs dropped 14% per year from 2009-2013, and continue to fall.
<snip>
In short, if the nuclear/coal utilities win, the climate loses. It really comes down to being that simple.
Thats the message of NIRS new paper, written by executive director Tim Judson. Titled Killing the Competition: The Nuclear Power Agenda to block climate action, stop renewable energy, and subsidize old reactors, the paper details this industry game plan. It is essential reading for every clean energy activist as we move to the type of battles described above in every state as the nuclear industry flails about to save itself from its own shortcomings and as every state must address its carbon footprint under the EPAs proposal, which will be finalized early next year. Download it here.
Comments on the EPAs proposal have been extended until December 1, 2014. You can tell the EPA to take all support for nuclear power out of the proposal here. Please do, and please ask your friends, colleagues, e-mail lists, congregations and any group you are involved with to do the same.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1303 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The nuclear industry’s game plan: kill the competition and fleece the ratepayers (Original Post)
bananas
Sep 2014
OP
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)1. ,
,