How Money Warps U.S. Foreign Policy
The key divide on Americas role in the world is no longer between Democrats and Republicans. Its between elites and everyone else.
On Sunday, when Hillary Clinton used an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg to take pointedly more hawkish stances than President Obama on Syria, Iran, and Gaza, observers chalked it up to her presidential ambitions. As one Democratic operative told Politico, Clintons advisors are good poll readers. On Tuesday, when Rand Paul declined to oppose U.S. airstrikes in Iraq, commentators interpreted it the same way.
The assumption that hawkishness is politically smart is deeply ingrained in the medias coverage of the 2016 presidential race. But its bizarre. Because in both parties, the polling data is overwhelming: Americans think U.S. foreign policy is too hawkish already. Foreign policy has always been more elite-driven, and more insulated from public opinion, than domestic policy. But todays elite-mass gap is the largest in decades. And regardless of your foreign-policy perspective, thats a problem for American democracy.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/08/how-money-warps-us-foreign-policy/376035/?single_page=true