Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 08:20 PM Jan 2015

History’s a Positive for Clinton; Not So for Bush or Romney

Source: ABC




History’s a Positive for Clinton; Not So for Bush or Romney


By Gary Langer
Jan 22, 2015 6:58am

Hillary Clinton’s potential place in history and her husband’s tenure in the White House boost her presidential prospects, while Jeb Bush’s political legacy and Mitt Romney’s 2012 run for the office are negatives, a new ABC News/Washington Post poll finds.

Clinton leads both in hypothetical head-to-head matchups at this early stage – as well as Rand Paul, Chris Christie and Mike Huckabee alike.

See PDF with full results and charts here.

The national survey finds 53 to 56 percent support for Clinton among registered voters against each of these potential Republican candidates, while they get 39 to 41 percent. One reason is that Clinton is stronger in her political base, given the far more fragmented nature of the current GOP field.

Further, registered voters by a 13-point margin say the fact that Clinton would be the first female president makes them more likely rather than less likely to support her. Her husband having served as president is another net positive, by an 8-point margin.....





Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2015/01/historys-a-positive-for-clinton-not-so-for-bush-or-romney/



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
History’s a Positive for Clinton; Not So for Bush or Romney (Original Post) riversedge Jan 2015 OP
Excellent news. Kingofalldems Jan 2015 #1
we will see is a couple of years... abakan Jan 2015 #2
They have been bereft of finding any meaningful "news" BumRushDaShow Jan 2015 #3
Overblown crap davidpdx Jan 2015 #4
Glad it shows Americans aren't willing to buy used bush and romney recycled bulloney. Cha Jan 2015 #5

BumRushDaShow

(129,084 posts)
3. They have been bereft of finding any meaningful "news"
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 09:17 PM
Jan 2015

ever since they combined the news and entertainment divisions... and thus need to fill up the time with something else that is irrelevant.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
4. Overblown crap
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 03:01 AM
Jan 2015
The national survey finds 53 to 56 percent support for Clinton among registered voters against each of these potential Republican candidates, while they get 39 to 41 percent. One reason is that Clinton is stronger in her political base, given the far more fragmented nature of the current GOP field.


1) No Democrats have formally announced. The only candidate that has set up a "committee" is Jim Webb and that doesn't necessarily mean he will run. So once again the meme of Clinton being the Democratic nominee is being pushed.

2) Clinton may have a stronger base, but not having a viable alternative for a primary probably is the reason why her numbers are stronger than the Republicans. If she runs and a viable alternative is available, those numbers will not be as strong.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»History’s a Positive for ...