Secret Service revokes security clearances of 11 accused of misconduct
Source: CBS/AP
(CBS/AP) WASHINGTON - The Secret Service has revoked the top secret security clearances for all 11 agents and officers accused of misconduct during a presidential mission to Colombia over the weekend.
The Secret Service personnel were sent back to the U.S. through Miami and interviewed in Washington regarding the alleged hiring of prostitutes and other misconduct. They have been placed on administrative leave and barred from entering Secret Service facilities worldwide.
"They are 'do no admit' and their equipment has been taken," a law enforcement official told CBS News correspondent Norah O'Donnell.
Two Secret Service supervisors were among the 11 involved. A top official confirms that the group also included three members of the Counter-Assault Teams, the agents who wear black commando outfits and carry large weapons.
Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57414811/secret-service-revokes-security-clearances-of-11-accused-of-misconduct/
!
PB
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)What does it have to do with the election?
Presidents don't run these outfits, and neither do the representatives. Obviously discipline is lacking among some of the Secret Service, but that's an issue about that department. It's a not a political thing at all. That's a very non-political group.
Kind of freaks me out, since we really need these people to keep their minds on their jobs, but it's not an election issue.
former9thward
(32,016 posts)Her name is Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)I hope it was worth it..
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)for 47 bucks you get to ring the doorbell, but hey, condoms are free.
aquart
(69,014 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)the night before JFK was assassinated.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Is Blackwater still hiring?
razorman
(1,644 posts)They will now be persona-non-grata for anything concerning the government.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)they won't have to wait long for employment
razorman
(1,644 posts)anyone without a security clearance, especially of that firm has federal government contracts. Simply having these guys as employees might disqualify a firm from much contract work. A sympathetic employer might wish to hire them, but if it affects the bottom line, then "tough".
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)are going to face from their wives and girlfriends when they return home. They may also lose their jobs.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)That on top of infidelity? Not making for a happy week for some people.
PB
Liber-AL
(71 posts)Men will be men...
The male sex drive is one given to him by nature. Beautiful females who look like movie stars are going to be hard for testosterone laden males to resist. Mix that with a little alcohol and...welll....you can guess the rest!
I suspect this is an ongoing practice that has always gone on under the radar. One prostitute haggled about a "price" and brought the whole tradition down!
tabasco
(22,974 posts)expects a little bit more form Secret Service agents than "WOOHOO - LET'S GET DRUNK AND FUCK!!!"
This is the kind of shit you expect from infantry lieutenants, not SS professionals.
Hope it helps.
Liber-AL
(71 posts)Thomas Jefferson and other high profile individuals who indulged in this "manly" transgression? I don't personally condone such conduct, but as a man I understand perfectly. Men have given up a lot in modern times and each tine we do a little masculinity erodes with it. Role reversals are becoming common place nowadays and I just found it a bit refreshing to hear some men are still acting like men... No offense intended
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I remember when we used the term male chauvinist pig when men said what you just did. It's really helped the women's movement.
Liber-AL
(71 posts)Damn if we do, damn if we don't!
lunatica
(53,410 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Not run around hiring prostitutes.
When you are on a Secret Service detail outside the country, you are "on duty" 24-7. If you're hiring prostitutes, you aren't doing your damn job.
Thomas Jefferson wasn't a Secret Service agent.
"Men have given up a lot in modern times?" Oh, really? I'd like to see THAT list!
You've done a fine job showing us your 'particulars' so early in the game. The kids would call that a colossal FAIL, I suppose.
Liber-AL
(71 posts)I guess I will just shut up and join the rest of the psychologically emasculated males in this country.
If I don't, you might even get a jury of 6 females to silence me forever in this forum...so, I will tuck my tail, bow my head and shuffle off into cyber obscurity, never to be heard or seen from again!
YEAH, in a RATSAZZ!
MADem
(135,425 posts)You are obtuse. Woefully so.
I don't --and did not-- suggest you "shut up and join the psychologically emasculated," I would suggest that you actually THINK before you comment. Then you wouldn't have people telling you that your remarks are not cogent.
And you might want to work on your attitude towards women. That said, it's certainly no wonder you have such an overarching interest in this topic. I'll say no more.
the particulars.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)Especially in a foreign country, ya know?
We all have a lot riding on the safety of the president, and this is not a confidence builder.
Skittles
(153,164 posts)these men are a fucking DISGRACE
by the way, there are plenty of men who not feel the need to buy women to use as semen receptacles
Is that the real issue? Is it because these men are guilty of doing something that men have been doing since the dawn of Homo Sapiens that you demonize them? Their disgrace is that they were not more careful and got caught... unlike many of their detractors who feign a higher morality. How many of your congressmen, governors or mayors have done the same thing, only more discretely?
Sure, there are some SS men who probably did resist the urge to , "party hardy" I commend them. But I cannot with a good conscience condemn those who gave in to their more prurient urges when I know that many who rail against them have done the same thing.
The one thing I do have a greater concern for though, is the possibility that the safety of the president might have been compromised in some way. Perhaps that should have been the overriding scheme of things when this first entered their minds.
From that perspective, the high ground would have been to abstain. However, as I said before, this is probably a tradition that hs been going on for some time. SO for there has been no reason for concerns about security or blackmail... But this time, they got caught.
you are HOPELESS
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Because you're guilty of doing the same thing? You sure are defending them vigorously. Takes one to know one or some such?
boppers
(16,588 posts)Regardless of the morality, they failed in terms of basic operational security, and broadcast a message to the world that our presidential security can be deeply compromised by nothing more than a few drinks and some hot women.
Is it the first time? Heck no. But it'll be the last time for this batch of idiots.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I would imagine that the normal urge to defecate is also wholly natural-- yet I imagine that most adults (regardless of sex) are able to better discipline themselves, and maintain appropriate decorum within the confines of social mores. "Lots of good, solid food is hard to resist. Mix that will and little alcohol and... well... you can guess the rest"
Unless of course, one simply holds fast to an ethical consistency and maintains that a member of secret service can and should be excused from taking a dump whenever and wherever they so choose, attributing that to, and then rationalizing it by the simplistic bumper-sticker of "boys will be boys..."
Danmel
(4,915 posts)They clearly lack the necessay discipline & judgment to be trusted with protecting the president.
gmpierce
(97 posts)They seem to have demonstrated what it takes to BE the president... or like Gingrich, to run for president.
crunch60
(1,412 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)They had better start looking for civilian law enforcement positions...
Skittles
(153,164 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Bacchus4.0
(6,837 posts)the federal government is the entity that issues these clearances. so they are really screwed with regards to ANY job that requires a security clearance. I imagine just about any law enforcement agency is out of the question for these guys.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...a co-worker of mine had rather bad afternoon. He found out that one of his in-laws, who thought he was selling guns to the IRA, was actually selling them to the FBI. He was told this by the Defense Investigative Service (now the Defense Security Service) who stopped by to pull his clearance.
So I wonder if the Yankee White process will change as a result of this.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Even neighbors, local police, teachers, friends, etc. There are lots of questions about who you know here, who you might know in foreign countries, etc etc.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)Many in the Secret Service are also subject to the Yankee White process and while there seems no undue influence has come to light, there are some troubling character issues here.
And they had top secret clearance ( I think there is only one level above that). In the private sector that is worth 30,000 dollars.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)There are 3 levels of classified information, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret. All CI is "need to know". Special access to comsec, crypto, SCI... are granted based on project assignment.
I just hope things have tightened up some.
boppers
(16,588 posts)But that's more of an "equivalent" to TS, rather than above, or below, it, though it's kind of a combo of TS *and* CNWDI.... as you allude to, it isn't really a hierarchical system, but some general levels, and then lots of specialized groupings in addition.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)I can't really comment on DoE clearances, I've never had one and I'm not familiar. I'm told in total there are sixteen intelligence gathering agencies and several departments granting clearances. It's been a long time for me. I'm sure things have changed a bit.
Have a good day.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)And were just checking out the voice search function.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I wonder how many of those cowboys were hired during the Bush years?
marshall
(6,665 posts)Prostitution is LEGAL in Colombia.
24601
(3,962 posts)for a clearance.
There are many things, e.g. excessive indebtedness, alcoholism, foreign connections, etc that aren't illegal but that can result in access suspension or clearance revocation.
The Secret Service chief has ordered polygraphs for the agents. Failure to cooperate with an investigation is grounds for termination. And lying to the investigator... well, ask Scooter if he has a felony conviction and no law license.
Some government agencies' employees are in the Excepted Service rather than the "competitive" civil service and they serve at the pleasure of their Directors. For the USSS, "Initial appointment to the special agent position is normally made in the excepted service."
http://www.secretservice.gov/opportunities_agent.shtml
MADem
(135,425 posts)There are regulations against bringing discredit upon the organization--they have more than enough grounds for termination, for anyone who can be proven to have 'consorted' or tolerated said conduct.
I had a cousin who did that work from Johnson through Reagan. He's retired now, but he was a choir boy.
Liber-AL
(71 posts)but you weren't with that choirboy 24/7 so you cannot say what he did or didn't do under the "right" circumstances.
BTW, women do similar things under the "right" circumstances. If you were lounging around the pool on a tropical beach and George Clooney, or a look a like, approached you, I can imagine where your thoughts would be.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Love the way you presume to speak for people you don't even know, to the point of predicting their conduct, in the hopes of goading and baiting posters on this message board. Your pattern, though, is far too obvious, you're a veritable bull in a china shop.
Enjoy your PPR, I have no doubt we'll be seeing more of your calcetines in the months ahead--because you lack something most people have, apparently--and that would be a LIFE. Poor, poor you.
HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)Another one with front-row seating at the Permanent Pizza Repast!
Thanks! That one was making the thread tiresome.
MADem
(135,425 posts)They must feel like one-armed paperhangers!
HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)amongst sundry calcetines. There are telling, sticky li'l fingerprints all over.
Glad I'm not MIRT. Have they gotten any sleep lately?
MADem
(135,425 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)They could have put the President in danger.
I have a son with this clearance. He knows that he CANNOT behave the way alot of other college students behave. He values his clearance and the opportunities it provides for him. How these grown men could be in the secret service and have so little self control is astounding.
Liber-AL
(71 posts)We don't know if these guys were married or not. We just assume they are/were.
Off duty time is theirs, but I think I would have opted to make better choices of what to do with my time.
But since they wanted to have fantasy sex with a dream woman for once in their miserable lives, we ought to be able to forgive them, tell them to sin no more and move on! No jobs should be lost over this... A heavy fine? YES.. .But, we have to accept the reality that at least some of them have wives and children. They deserve a second chance!
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)They have a pretty damn important job to do. Getting wasted, bringing hookers or any person you just picked up at a bar, back to your room is very good cause to lose your clearance and therefore your job. You put the office you are sworn to protect in jeopardy by doing so.
That job, that clearance, is not an easy thing to obtain. It is quite valuable. The people with it are supposed to be the best. They are supposed to be held to a higher standard because they have a dangerous and important job to do.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's still contrary to the UCMJ and if a servicemember under the age of majority is caught they can be hung out to dry for it.
Same deal with federal civil service--if your conduct brings discredit upon the organization or the government, you can and will be held to account.
Don't for a second think your life is your own when you choose to work for the federal government. You agree--and the key word there is AGREE--to abide by certain standards of conduct as a consequence of your employment, and you AGREE--and again, there's that word--that if you fail to meet the stated expectations that you can be dismissed and/or otherwise disciplined.
24601
(3,962 posts)so, US sex-tourism laws with world-wide application kick in. Consent, local laws and payment become irrelevant.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The woman that they (forgive the expression) stiffed for the payment has spoken to investigators. I am given to understand that she is a 24 year old single mother working for a high-end escort service. I don't know for certain if all of the prostitutes came from that service, but it wouldn't surprise me if that were the case, as they were all in a group at a disco, which is where they met these fellahs.
They've got surveillance tape at the hotel as well. It's all over but the tortured explanations to wives and the sobbing, I think.
The latest: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/04/prostitute-describes-dispute-with-secret-service-agent/1#.T5C3fquudKs
"I tell him, 'Baby, my cash money,' " the woman tells Times reporter William Neuman in her first public comments on the incident.
She tells the Times that the man offered $30 for the night of sex but, in what may stem from a misunderstanding because of the language barrier, she thought they had agreed to $800.
The dispute turned into a hallway quarrel in the luxury Hotel Caribe, eventually drawing in another prostitute, Colombian police officers and other Secret Service agents who tried to defuse the argument.
24601
(3,962 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)You can get it with car rentals and hotel rooms, but only if there's a pre-existing contract for services.
To the best of my knowledge, GSA doesn't have a prostitution contracts on file!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Last edited Wed May 9, 2012, 12:49 PM - Edit history (1)
where they have files of classified information relating to the President's future itinerary. I can't understand why their superiors got pissed off about this behavior.
unionworks
(3,574 posts)It's something spooks are trained to recognize and avoid. These guys knew better, and they got caught, compromising our security and disgracing the honor of the Service.
Why do I get the feeling Hugo Chavez is laughing his ass off over this? Answer - Google search "Chavez - Columbia" and see what's been going on lately. T the very least an embarrasment, at most an encouragement to our enemies demonstrating how easily our MOST VITAL SECURITY CAN BE PENETRATED. I would not want to be in the shoes of these incredibly dumb bastards.
MADem
(135,425 posts)As for Hugo, though, I don't think he's doing all that much laughing. He recently got back from Cuba and yet another round of chemo, trying to beat back some serious cancer.
He's also mired in a He Said/He Said judicial scandal:
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/19/world/americas/venezuela-ex-judge/?hpt=hp_t2
I think his inclinations might be to gloat, but he's got a full plate of domestic and health problems and they're not looking better as time goes on.
unionworks
(3,574 posts)But I read on the google that Hugo had cut off relationships with Columbia a while back, but in the weeks preceeding the SS inckident, had a summit with Lumbo looking to better relationships or something. What better way to kiss his ass than to slap the U.S. in the face with an embarrasment. Take it with a grain of salt, I do enjoy playing armchair spy.
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)It's a dick thing, for God's sake. It's ridiculous to devote all the air time and space yammering on about it. I don't think they compromised national security by getting laid. News flash - happens all the time, and nobody dies.
Scout
(8,624 posts)as in, they were acting like dicks?
as in, men can't control their dicks?
and yes, you are the only one who doesn't care
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)But as far as I know, the men paying for sex were men, and therefore had penises, also known as dicks.
I didn't care about Clinton's consensual sex acts, nor Weiner's consensual sex acts, and I don't care about this shit either. But then, I'm not a sexually repressed moron who keeps her nose glued to the zippers of government officials or employees.
Scout
(8,624 posts)neither am i. apparently the Secret Service is though:
so you still didn't explain what you meant by "it's a dick thing" ... do you mean that those men couldn't control their dicks? that they think with them? that's pretty damn insulting to men, if that's what you meant. so, i'm seeking clarification here.
what does "it's a dick thing" mean?
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)normal urges to copulate with sexy women. In this case, they were men, so it was a dick thing.
There are books you can read, you know.