Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 11:00 AM Jan 2015

Pentagon announces base closures in Europe

Source: The Hill

The U.S. military is returning 15 bases and facilities back to their host nations throughout Europe, the Pentagon announced Thursday.

The closures are part of a plan to consolidate infrastructure and save money.

The closures and consolidations will affect facilities in the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, and Portugal.

The closures will save the U.S. $500 million annually, the Pentagon said in a statement.

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/defense/228867-pentagon-announces-base-closures-in-europe

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon announces base closures in Europe (Original Post) tammywammy Jan 2015 OP
about time. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2015 #1
A few years ago they wanted to close some bases, but were stopped by Congress. n/t tammywammy Jan 2015 #5
I recall that. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2015 #11
Oh goody, only 647 more to go. nt procon Jan 2015 #2
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Jan 2015 #7
Amen.... daleanime Jan 2015 #9
Correct me if I'm wrong- packman Jan 2015 #10
+1 mountain grammy Jan 2015 #12
do you have a list Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #29
Part of our peace dividend....yay! Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #3
Subtract 15 bases Thespian2 Jan 2015 #4
What will the Soviets think? Renew Deal Jan 2015 #6
Close the bases and open more private golf courses. SoapBox Jan 2015 #8
Close every base that has a golf course. n/t Mr.Bill Jan 2015 #13
That would be most of them, including almost every base in the US jmowreader Jan 2015 #25
I'm sure it would. Mr.Bill Jan 2015 #26
They're for the morale of the troops, and the troops pay for their operation jmowreader Jan 2015 #27
those little facts do not Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #30
Yeah, and no TVs in the barracks Recursion Jan 2015 #32
Morale and recreation programs are a very important part of military life. Aristus Jan 2015 #35
You're not going to get drafted, are you? tabasco Jan 2015 #36
Why? gladium et scutum Jan 2015 #28
Who needs bases when you have drones? NV Whino Jan 2015 #14
The drones have to land somewhere (nt) Recursion Jan 2015 #31
Spoil sport NV Whino Jan 2015 #34
And? Beowulf42 Jan 2015 #15
This is the DoD's response to the sequester that is already in place bigbrother05 Jan 2015 #20
Sequester going forward, yes it is. freshwest Jan 2015 #33
$500 million is just a drop in the bucket Victor_c3 Jan 2015 #16
I'm surprised that the govt can run 15 overseas military bases for a year on $500 million. olddad56 Jan 2015 #18
I am kind of out of it so maybe I misunderstood the article Victor_c3 Jan 2015 #21
But we have to defend Portugal from . . . uh, some kind of . . . invasion, maybe? tclambert Jan 2015 #17
... geardaddy Jan 2015 #19
List of planned changes in Europe: Baclava Jan 2015 #22
My early childhood was spent on bases overseas. When we rotated back the states I was 8... Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #23
Cool. They can buy one more F-35 that won't work. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2015 #24
Great. Now Germany and Italy are going to start stuff again. christx30 Jan 2015 #37

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
11. I recall that.
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 12:07 PM
Jan 2015

The arguments raised by the GoOPers reminded me of expansionist some behind the scenes war-mongers wanting to take over the whirled. Without involving their own skin, spawn or spunk.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
10. Correct me if I'm wrong-
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 11:58 AM
Jan 2015

But it seems that I read that quite a few of those 647 "bases" are very small and basically just a few buildings warehousing military supplies.

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
4. Subtract 15 bases
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 11:39 AM
Jan 2015

and what does the poor U. S. Military have left? Isn't that approximately 647, supported by America's enormous debt?

Mr.Bill

(24,300 posts)
26. I'm sure it would.
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 06:57 PM
Jan 2015

I just do not see a national Defense need for there to be golf courses at military bases.

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
27. They're for the morale of the troops, and the troops pay for their operation
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 07:07 PM
Jan 2015

This has been discussed repeatedly...here we go again.

There are two kinds of funding for the military: appropriated funds and nonappropriated funds.

Appropriated funds come from Congress, which means they come from you and I. This funding source pays for things like planes that don't work, ships the Pentagon didn't ask for, field rations no one likes, fuel, ammo, troop housing...all the things the military "must" have to operate.

Nonappropriated funds are called "profits" in the civilian world. A golf course has greens fees, a pro shop and a bar & grill, all of which charge the troops who choose to use them. A crafts shop charges a fee to use it. Youth sports has a fee. Those fees are kept low enough that the facility breaks even, and if they DO turn a profit that money has to be turned over to Army Emergency Relief or the equivalent in the other services.

Strangely enough, the reenlistment rate on bases that have things like golf courses and family support services is higher than the rate on bases that don't. It doesn't cost the taxpayers anything to have golf courses and the troops like it, so why not?

Aristus

(66,381 posts)
35. Morale and recreation programs are a very important part of military life.
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 11:44 AM
Jan 2015

It isn't just about golf. My father, who was career Army, was heavily involved in the theater program of whichever base he happened to be stationed. He starred as John Adams in a highly-acclaimed Army production of "1776" in 1974, a production for which they rented the costumes used in the movie a few years before. My mother, as a dependent spouse, often appeared in plays with him, and she directed the church choir, which was made up of volunteers from the community.

Morale and Reacreation also sponsored Dependent Youth Activities, a program that offered things like swimming lessons, T-ball, judo, arts and crafts, and other activities to the children of service members.

I suppose we could insist that our soldiers live a spartan, monastic existence during their time of service. But it wouldn't reflect the importance of one of the cornerstones of our military: the Citizen Soldier; a member of the nation and the communities he defends.

Beowulf42

(204 posts)
15. And?
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 12:35 PM
Jan 2015

We need a corresponding decrease in the military budget, right? That's the way things work in the real world. We don't need to take away funds from bases overseas and add them to the war-making ability of the American military. GO PEACE.

bigbrother05

(5,995 posts)
20. This is the DoD's response to the sequester that is already in place
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 02:20 PM
Jan 2015

this lets them keep up troop strength and get new weapons too.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
16. $500 million is just a drop in the bucket
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 12:44 PM
Jan 2015

but it is progress. $500 million amounts to less than 1/10 of 1 percent (less than .1%) of the military budget

olddad56

(5,732 posts)
18. I'm surprised that the govt can run 15 overseas military bases for a year on $500 million.
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 01:57 PM
Jan 2015

They were blowing more than that a day in Iraq. I didn't even think they could buy a hammer for that little.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
21. I am kind of out of it so maybe I misunderstood the article
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 02:38 PM
Jan 2015

but I believe they were just going to move the existing troops and equipment to other bases. So the closure of those 15 bases really isn't a decrease at all in our military capability or size.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
17. But we have to defend Portugal from . . . uh, some kind of . . . invasion, maybe?
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 01:51 PM
Jan 2015

When have American troops ever, ever been needed in Portugal?

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
22. List of planned changes in Europe:
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 03:11 PM
Jan 2015

The changes will mean a slight reduction in overall force levels, but troop numbers in Europe are expected to hold near the current level of 67,000.

United Kingdom

Divest RAF Mildenhall:
• Returns the installation and four supported sites to the United Kingdom.
• DOD intends to relocate the operational units at RAF Mildenhall within Europe — the assigned KC-135s and the 352nd Special Operations Group to Germany and the assigned RC-135s within the U.K. This paves the way for the stationing of two squadrons of F-35s at RAF Lakenheath, starting in 2020.
• Divest RAF Alconbury/RAF Molesworth: Consolidation of missions allows the permanent return of RAF Alconbury, RAF Molesworth and supporting sites to the United Kingdom. The majority of U.S. personnel, and many of the U.S.-funded host nation positions assigned to these bases will be transferred to RAF Croughton.


Germany

• Close Mainz-Kastel Station — fully returns the site to Germany.
• Close Barton Barracks — fully returns the site to Germany and relocates the Department of Defense Dependents Schools Bavaria district office to Grafenwöhr.
• Partially close Pulaski Barracks in the Kaiserslautem area — returns part of the site to Germany.
• Close Weilimdorf warehouse site — returns the site to German control.
• Close two Baumholder waterworks — returns control to Germany.
• Relocate HQs DISA-Europe from Stuttgart to Kaiserslautem.
• Close Amelia Earhart Hotel in Wiesbaden.
• Partially close Artillery Kaserne in Garmisch — returns two-thirds of the site to Germany.
• Restructure the Army Air Force Exchange Services bakery and water distribution operations at Grünstadt.
• Close Husterhöh Kaserne in Pirmasens — returns the site to Germany.
• Relocate mail sorting/distribution from German Aerial Mail Terminal in Frankfurt to Germersheim Army Depot — efficiencies and personnel moves only.
• Create a distribution center of excellence at Germersheim Army Depot.
• Consolidate various communication data centers across EUCOM.
• Close commissaries at Illesheim and Sembach, as well as the four commissaries in Stuttgart at Kelley Barracks, Patch Barracks, Panzer Barracks and Robinson Barracks, once a new replacement store on Panzer is constructed.
• Consolidate Defense Media Activity operations across Europe.
• Consolidate communications, postal services and personnel management that support the U.S. mission to NATO and the U.S. military delegation to the NATO military committee.

Belgium

• Divest leased site in Brussels — Consolidation of U.S. facilities in Brussels to Sterrebeek.

The Netherlands

• Divest Schinnen Emma Mine leased site, Netherlands and consolidate U.S. facilities at Brunssum.

Italy

• Place a portion of the Pisa Ammo Storage Area, near Livorno, into caretaker status.
Partially close Camp Darby near Livorno. Returns about half of the installation to Italy.
Convert the Vicenza Health Center to outpatient and specialty care only.

Portugal

• Streamline operations and property at Lajes Field — Reduces active duty, civilian personnel and contract providers by two-thirds. A number of the buildings at Lajes will also be returned to Portugal.

http://www.stripes.com/news/europe/raf-mildenhall-to-close-amid-other-europe-consolidations-1.322825

Pacifist Patriot

(24,653 posts)
23. My early childhood was spent on bases overseas. When we rotated back the states I was 8...
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 03:27 PM
Jan 2015

after a few months I grew increasingly puzzled and finally asked my parents if we could go visit the German, Italian, and English military bases here in the U.S. It never occurred to me that we would have a military presence elsewhere, but foreign countries would not have their own here.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
37. Great. Now Germany and Italy are going to start stuff again.
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 08:18 PM
Jan 2015

The last time we didn't have bases there, they started WWII.

The illogical, alarmist view is fun. And we also need to do something about the Lambada. It's too sexual of a dance move!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pentagon announces base c...