Idaho woman shot dead by two-year-old son was successful nuclear scientist
Source: Guardian
The woman who was accidentally shot dead by her two-year-old son in an Idaho Walmart is described by those who knew her as a gun lover, a motivated academic and a successful nuclear research scientist.
<snip>
All the precautionary measures werent taken to ensure the safety of that weapon, Miller said later.
<snip>
She went on to become a nuclear research scientist working for Battelles Idaho National Laboratory, which claims to be the Department of Energys lead nuclear research laboratory. The lab has worked with the Department of Defense on armor and weaponry since the 1990s. Rutledge wrote several papers there, on topics such as nuclear waste and fuel processing.
<snip>
She was very competent, said Loomis. This is not somebody that is just a nut, let me tell you.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/31/idaho-nuclear-scientist-shot-dead-son-walmart
This was a horrible tragedy, and it should remind us that even highly intelligent, competent, trained scientists are only human, and sometimes they make horrible mistakes.
They make horrible mistakes with their children, and they make mistakes with their nuclear weapons systems.
While this was a personal tragedy, a number of scientists have been warning us that a horrible mistake with our nuclear weapons systems is all but inevitable, unless we get rid of them, worldwide.
bananas
(27,509 posts)Mom shot by 2-year-old: nuclear scientist who supported gun rights
Originally published Wednesday, December 31, 2014 at 12:15 PM
By NICHOLAS K. GERANIOS
Associated Press
SPOKANE, Wash.
Concealed weapons are part of everyday life in Idaho, and that's unlikely to change in the Mountain West state despite a shocking accident in which a 2-year-old boy reached into his mother's purse, grabbed her gun and shot her in the head inside a Wal-Mart.
<snip>
"She was not the least bit irresponsible," her father-in-law, Terry Rutledge said, in a brief interview with The Associated Press. He complained about people using the incident to attack his daughter-in-law.
Terry Rutledge told The Washington Post that Veronica Rutledge and her husband practiced at shooting ranges and each had a concealed weapons permit. He said for Christmas this year, her husband gave her the purse with a special zippered pocket for a concealed weapon.
<snip>
She was an employee of the Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho, where she was a nuclear scientist. The laboratory supports the U.S. Department of Energy in nuclear and energy research and national defense.
<snip>
samsingh
(17,599 posts)despite all the preventive measures.
if she wasn't scared or brainwashed into believing that having a loaded gun in your purse with children around was a good thing, this tragedy would not have happened.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Now where did I put those cobra bag twist ties?
When is criminal negligence going to be called criminal negligence again? Why is a gun the American sacred cow?
samsingh
(17,599 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)near a two year old.
That was more than a 'horrible mistake.' That was gross negligence.
Warpy
(111,272 posts)I don't know why she felt it necessary to carry a gun everyplace and why she put it in the stupidest place possible, a purse full of other junk where it was difficult to retrieve and other stuff in the purse could knock the safety off.
Being a nuclear scientist is no guarantee of mental stability or a lack of ignorance about everyday items which, for her, was a deadly weapon.
What a complete waste.
ileus
(15,396 posts)The have compartments (most with lockable zippers) especially designed for a holstered and secured firearm.
Her mistake was not having it on her person and/or not having the zipper locked. What good is a SD firearm if it's out of hands reach if needed. Or in this case beside her son....
A complete waste indeed.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)if she didn't use it, everything was for naught.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)even exist is a symptom of the gun loving addiction of America....
"Clean up in Ailse Two"....just another tragic and so easily preventble gun overdose victim.
Wait for the sun to rise again for the next tragic story of gun addiction in America.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)AND ignorance. She wasn't working for the Peaceful Atom, Warpy. Not at Battelle.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)How about the troops? Should we not let them back in the country? Or jut send them straight to institutions?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Stay classy, ANM.
msongs
(67,413 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Irony?
[center][/center]
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)and had a bit too much radiation poisoning.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... but she didn't have a lick of common sense.
that's not so far fetched. One of my parents was an electronics wiz, had a good position with a DoD contractor but not nuclear and he was a terrorist in his own home. We sold his guns when he wasn't home once. But I digress.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... to say most MIC contractor employees are paranoid, as I am very close to someone who also had a security clearance and has worked under contract all his life AND has license to carry. Producing all those WMDs does something to the psyche.
My parent wasn't the only one of those with whom I've been acquainted who had such proclivities.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... or, more accurately , the MIAC, A for academic, since fundimental scientific research and development is an essential component of national security and defense.
Believe me, it is a lot easier to find signs and symptoms of parrinoia here on DU than it is in and around a physics laboratory.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... guess it depends on what your definition of "paranoid" is.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)L'ing OL as having a nerve hit. I'm forever amazed and often amused by the presumptive nonsense I often read, here and and in other forums. When I have direct experience I try to share it in order to encourage a broader and more acuurate perspective.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)bearssoapbox
(1,408 posts)Except for that 'one' time...
That she was.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)more than one purse so probably not, but if she wasn't working in a secure area, there might be no reason to check.
Maybe thought being a nuclear scientist she was in danger?
Regardless, I've had a belly bag version of that for a lot of years, and they are designed for easy access to a hidden weapon. A 2 year old would find it trivial, and probably any safety as well, if that didn't just get knocked around.
I read a quote elsewhere that said the mom that caused it had no responsibility but the kid was gonna have to face "what he did" when he got older.
wtf?
What he did was be a normal, healthy 2 year old, a creature of sticky hands and pure inquisitiveness. He didn't do a thing wrong, and I hope the adults in his life don't try and punish him for her mistake until he hurts someone else.
It's weird to live in a country where people hold out hope that the young will save them, despite the evidence of the past, and the fact that broken adults can't just breed unbroken children as if they aren't creating little replicas of themselves.
Gun sales for women were so brisk they reported those especially on the news these past weeks, all the pink and purple expressions of love that may right now be swinging past you in a purse, which was something else being talked up.
Peace.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)She wasn't to blame for carrying a loaded gun in her purse that was available to her children to access? Meaningless. I'm sure lots of intelligent paranoids are human. Im guessing it could happen to anyone...who carries a loaded weapon around in their purse that can be accessed by a two year old, or three year old, or ten year old, or twenty year old, or possibly a pet, or thief, or blah, blah, blah.
"Quite frankly my dear, I don't give a damn."
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)or did she take it with her everywhere?
strange....
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)riverwalker
(8,694 posts)that you can't go to Walmart without packing heat? I don't think so. Insanity.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)the same thing. Especially in Middleofnowhere, Idaho.
Historic NY
(37,451 posts)perhaps everyone is paranoid of each other.
http://isp.idaho.gov/BCI/CrimeInIdaho/CrimeInIdaho2013/Kootenai%20County.pdf
Nay
(12,051 posts)There are places in Idaho you don't wanna go to, and you don't want to stumble upon those places accidentally either. Add in a bunch of Mormons and. . .
Not that this excuses her idiot behavior of taking a gun and 4 little kids to a Walmart. I simply will never understand these people.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)marble falls
(57,102 posts)or another shopper.
Casual carry with a chambered round? Not very smart.
How many "citizens with a gun" saved the day lat year? How many citizens with a gun were shot or shot someone else accidentally?
No need to be packing at WalMart with children. No reason at all.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)marble falls
(57,102 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)The bullet hit the right person in this case. IMO. What could she have done had it hit an innocent person. Say "I'm sorry". This woman may have been a scientist, but she wasn't too bright when it came to guns and kids.
watoos
(7,142 posts)I live in Alabama, half way between Pittsburgh and Philly, and I blog on a local web site. There are like 4 of us who are "liberals."
Let me tell you this, I live in a rural town, but most of these people keep loaded guns hidden throughout their houses, most of these people conceal carry wherever they go.(or open carry)
I accuse them of being paranoid and they all jump all over me and state that they carry guns wherever they go because they are not afraid when they do so. They are not afraid because they have loaded guns hidden all over their houses.
When I tell them that I have never locked my doors, that I have gotten rid of my guns when I stopped hunting, that I never saw the need to buy a hand gun, they ask me what I am going to do when 2 crazed, drugged up thieves show up at my house to rob me?
I tell them that I live in the moment, that I don't worry about far fetched future possibilities.
They all pile on me and accuse me of being afraid, name call (limp wristed lib).
The bottom line that they all stick with is that because they hide guns in their houses and pack wherever they go, they are not afraid.
Scary, isn't it?
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)If you have to sit around and dream up "what if" scenarios, and then further imagine "what if" scenarios that might make you more safe in that narrow instance while remaining oblivious to the reality of being less safe all the time and making those around you less safe, then there's a good chance your paranoia is getting the better of you.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)addiction. I think addiction theory has a lot to tell us about the massive lack of reasoning in gun loving folk.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)DBoon
(22,366 posts)Best oxymoron of the year
Locrian
(4,522 posts)>>paranoid of owning a harmless weapon
It's like they're in reverse. They never think THEY will screw up, and assume everyone ELSE is out to get them.
Like some sort of virus where you make the more dangerous choice. I mean the thought of carrying - having to be aware of carrying - EVERY SECOND and never loosing track of your 'harmless weapon'. Because if you do - your 2 yr old shoots you.
And say you do carry "all the time". Does anyone not think that it will not become so routine that your forget? Ever lose your car keys? Cell phone? etc.
CC should be a HUGE deal to get a license. A gun is not a pacifier - you don't automatically eliminate threats just by buying one. It just seems that they view them as a cure all for fear and don't realize the tremendous cost. The "risk analysis" is never done: they see some type of "risk" (real or imagines) but don't do the rest of the calculation concerning the potential for screw up and severity of the screw up.
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)I feel as if a substantial portion of the US - the teabagger/fundie crowd - has become delusional due to Fox News.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)been CLOSE to getting mugged or whatever?..I'm guessing they have not.
I lived in cities for at least half my life and, over the course of many years,
was the victim of a purse snatching and two home invasions (no harm to me, but did
have to physically "escape" one situation to avoid contact) and I STILL don't carry
a gun, nor feel the need to do so!
I honestly cannot get into the mindsets of these people
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)And they still do not see through to their own paranoia, spoon fed to them by the NRA and Fox, they have just given in to it, it is woven into their fabric of their life.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)at least in that rural Pennsylvania area the poster mentioned.
I'm guessing most of these rural small towners have rarely, if ever, come close to a
mugger.
DBoon
(22,366 posts)An unknown threat requires more drastic measures than a known and familiar threat
whathehell
(29,067 posts)DBoon
(22,366 posts)nt
DBoon
(22,366 posts)Fear of outsiders drives political xenophobia and racism. If you don't believe the police can provide any protection or enforce the rules of a civilized world, then by implication any government initiative or common action is impossible.
Splitting us into paranoid individuals suspicious of each other and of even the possibility of common action make it easier for elites to rule us.
You are seeing civil society split into a thousand broken shards.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Putting a loaded weapon into a place where a toddler can easily access it, then getting shot and killed by said toddler with same weapon, sounds like it meets the criteria to me!
Vinca
(50,278 posts)Is Idaho, in general, such a dangerous place you have to pack heat 24/7? If so, why live there? This is completely beyond my comprehension. If I felt the need to be heavily armed when I go off to buy new underwear (which, apparently, these folks need because they're constantly shitting themselves in fear), I'd move elsewhere. Pssssst . . . keep your eye on that Walmart greeter. Just because he's in a wheelchair doesn't mean he won't try to kill you.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)aND i bELiEvE aNYtHinG thE vOIces tEll mE.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)But I guess where you live is crime free.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)99.9% of the time if you take common sense precautions you'll be just fine anywhere. Everyone at any time is at risk of the worst possible disaster in life happening to them, but this lady was more likely to be struck by lightening or attacked by a shark. Of course she'd be armed so she could have shark fillets for dinner. In any case, I'm much more afraid of people driving and texting than of being attacked by a criminal. I do recall 2 recent fatalities caused by that.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Find a new shtick.
Getting very stale.
blackcrow
(156 posts)No one is a "successful nuclear scientist." That takes a PhD at the least, and a track record.
All these reports say is that, impressions to the contrary, she was not a total idiot.
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)Said she was very well regarded in his office. Really such a senseless tragedy.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)May not have worked with her
But to lose someone who works in your building like that
It eventually spills over and effects almost everyone
It's easy to sit in judgment of this woman.
What she should have done, could have done, etc
It doesn't take away from the tragedy
irisblue
(32,980 posts)that poor kid
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)They communicated via phone and writing.
kath
(10,565 posts)hardly a "successful nuclear scientist".
"Journalism" these days. Sheesh.
paleotn
(17,931 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)is completely indefensible. There is no legitimate reason for anyone in the middle of nowhere Idaho to be packing heat in Walmart in the first place. The victim here is the poor child whose mother put him, herself, and everyone else in that store in harm's way by her stupidity and paranoia.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Everyone does stupid and impulsive stuff. Adding guns multiplies the badness of anything stupid or impulsive.
JDDavis
(725 posts)As her dead corpse is now in evidence.
These people that think one needs to carry a firearm on a shopping trip in the suburbs are probably mostly very fearful, perhaps even paranoid people. Schooled in firearms from an early age, and convinced over and over of the "necessity" of carrying a weapon as a "rational" act, reinforced by two or three incidents a year where they hear or read about someone using a gun in self-defense, (and choosing to ignore the literally hundreds of stories of tragic "accidental" deaths involving children).
How not tho raise children is what this mother never learned.
kath
(10,565 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)former9thward
(32,023 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)She doesn't sound very fucking smart to me.
global1
(25,253 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)This has got to be the single cheapest shot you've taken against nuclear.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)how a young woman with a BS (2010) in chemistry turned into a "nuclear scientist". (this information was in a link in another article, yesterday - an online version of the commencement program from her university graduation. Sorry, I don't recall which article it was).
She worked at a DOE lab - apparently many people in the town do - but I'm not seeing the credentials that made her a "nuclear scientist".
This story keeps being repeated as if it somehow changes what happened - as if, yes, a highly educated and trained "nuclear scientist" can make a tragic mistake and that should mitigate the fact that she put a loaded weapon in her handbag, presumably with the safety off, in reach of her toddler child.
Even if she really had been a "nuclear scientist" it wouldn't change the seriousness of her lapse in judgement.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)because she was a scientist. Not some dumb truck driver gun nut who we should hold accountable. We can forgive a scientist.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)I feel sorry for the child, not so much the irresponsible mother.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)JEFF9K
(1,935 posts)And how would one earn that designation?
miyazaki
(2,244 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)but she's no gun nut?
Iggo
(47,558 posts)Top of the list, per the people that knew her.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Grandpa seems to think that because the purse was designed as a purse for concealed gun carry, it was some magic purse.
DBoon
(22,366 posts)Having a gun in your possession will magically repel evil. It is a magic amulet that repels any attack or threat.
Runningdawg
(4,517 posts)is not always synonymous with common sense. If you feel the need to carry to shop in walmart, shop somewhere you feel safe. If you can't find a safe place, carry on your body. If you feel the need to carry anywhere you might shop, then its an unsafe place for children. Find a sitter, go alone.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)And the plain stupidity of leaving a loaded weapon where a child could get a hold of it.
I guess nuclear scientists don't study the safe handling of deadly weapons.
I feel sorry for the poor kid growing up knowing that he killed his mother with a gun.
Seems like I saw a study that said you are way more likely to die from your own firearm than shoot a bad guy with it.
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)People trying to draw some greater moral lesson out of this incident are grasping at straws.
ShannonB
(5 posts)So sad for the child
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)It's ballistics.
ncjustice80
(948 posts)And people wonder why I want the 2A repealed
valerief
(53,235 posts)to NOT have a gun around a child? The best I can guess is that she was mentally deranged. If not, she was one STOOOPID asshole.
Guns Kill!
Reter
(2,188 posts)She's dead, and you still feel the need to call her a whacked POS.
question everything
(47,486 posts)who refused to realize that guns and kids do not mix.