Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bosonic

(3,746 posts)
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 05:49 PM Dec 2014

CDC reports potential Ebola exposure in Atlanta lab

Source: Washington Post

One scientist may have been exposed to the Ebola virus and as many as a dozen others are being assessed for potential exposure at a lab of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, agency officials said Wednesday.

The potential exposure took place Monday when scientists conducting research on the virus at a high-security lab mistakenly put a sample containing the potentially infectious virus in a place where it was transferred for processing to another CDC lab, also in Atlanta on the CDC campus.

The technician has no symptoms of illness and is being monitored for 21 days. Agency spokeswoman Barbara Reynolds said others who entered the lab have been contacted and will be assessed for possible exposure by CDC clinicians. She said the number of exposures could be much less than a dozen.

Agency officials said there was no possible exposure outside the secure laboratory at CDC and no exposure or risk to the public. The mistake took place Monday afternoon and was discovered by laboratory scientists Tuesday and reported to leadership within an hour of the discovery.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-reports-potential-ebola-exposure-in-atlanta-lab/2014/12/24/f1a9f26c-8b8e-11e4-8ff4-fb93129c9c8b_story.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
4. happy merry Steve and I have to say auto correct made me smile
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 06:10 PM
Dec 2014

I just learned how to finger swoop type vs touch each letter and it comes up with some odd stuff

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)
2. How in the heck do so many experienced lab people get exposed in a lab?
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 05:55 PM
Dec 2014

Saying they didn't know is was Ebola doesn't cut it. They don't exposed when they are testing flu viruses do they?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
3. Yes, they do get exposed when testing flu viruses.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 06:04 PM
Dec 2014

Mistakes happen. Protocols help prevent them, but no protocol stops all mistakes.

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)
5. Yea, I know that happens sometimes in hospital labs, not very often.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 06:14 PM
Dec 2014

But the CDC? They test the serious crap. I can understand losing vials. I can understand misplacing vials. But for that many techs to go around touching the blood and each other just doesn't sound right. Was it labeled "flu vaccine" accidentally?

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
9. It doesn't look like they all contacted the sample, from the article
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 06:36 PM
Dec 2014

"And each other" is the completely mundane part and could probably be things as simple as two regular coworkers passing through the same doorway or something. My guess would be that one person might have been exposed and they're keeping an eye on everyone that tech worked closely with.

The extent of the precautions there would be part of the seriousness you're talking about - any BSL-4 facility's going to err way on the side of caution if they even suspect the possibility of something going wrong, to a point that would look like a huge frantic reaction to layfolk. The basic procedure there is to treat any kind of suspected issue as though someone had let loose weaponized smallpox or something like that.

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)
10. I went back and re-read the article and it seems t be a bad but basically accidental
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 06:43 PM
Dec 2014

mishap. For some reason I had read something that 10 people had been exposed and trying to figure just how in the heck that could happen at the CDC. Since I am turning 67 next month, I have been trying to watch how I interpret things. Thanks for catching me,.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
6. Merry effen' Christmas, just when Ebola was no longer a major news story . . .
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 06:22 PM
Dec 2014


Nevertheless, I hope and pray for the good health of those exposed to the virus.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
7. Mistakes happen more often than you'd think
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 06:30 PM
Dec 2014

In his book THE HOT ZONE, Richard Preston lists how many mishaps have occurred simply because someone's hand slipped while handling a deadly specimen. People make mistakes.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
8. Ebola outbreak? That's so... pre-election.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 06:34 PM
Dec 2014

Did everyone else notice that as soon as the election was over the Republican outrage about the epidemic in the US went away?

Of course the epidemic was only in the minds of the Republicans and the media to begin with.

cynzke

(1,254 posts)
12. Better Get Issa.....
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 07:48 AM
Dec 2014

This calls for a congressional investigation! All those new congressmen will want to get in on the action!

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
13. time to increase funding at the CDC
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 09:17 AM
Dec 2014

Right? We need good science to deal with bad bugs. How did they do in the 2015 budget?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CDC reports potential Ebo...