Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 10:13 AM Dec 2014

Union retirees: Don't cut my pension

Source: CNN

By Melanie Hicken

Aimed at saving some of the country's largest pension funds from the brink, the law will allow multiemployer pension plans that are projected to become insolvent in the next 10 to 20 years to cut the benefits of both current and future retirees.

By allowing the plans to cut benefits now, lawmakers say it will help keep around 150 pension funds from running out of money.

But retirees aren't exactly seeing it that way. Many gave up years of pay increases and contributed thousands of dollars from their salaries each year toward their promised pensions. As a result, many have little savings outside of their pension benefits and Social Security checks and are not sure how they'll make ends meet if the cuts go through.

"It's devastating," said 63-year-old Dave Scheidt, who retired five years ago after more than 30 years loading and unloading trucks. "We never dreamed that our pension wouldn't be there."

Related: Congress approves plan to allow pension cuts (@ link)

FULL story at link.




Dave Scheidt and his wife Becki worry that their pension benefits will be cut.


Read more: http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/22/retirement/pension-cut/

181 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Union retirees: Don't cut my pension (Original Post) Omaha Steve Dec 2014 OP
Congress approves plan to allow pension cuts. I expect this of Republicans ... Scuba Dec 2014 #1
Yes. Corporo-Dems say, "They wanted hell, we gave them purgatory, closeupready Dec 2014 #18
actually the Conservatives control the Senate PatrynXX Dec 2014 #25
Conservatives hated the bill actually yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #26
...and some will vote for them because ...D. L0oniX Dec 2014 #76
Well, Republican ARE worse. They want to cut union pensions, for crying out loud. Scuba Dec 2014 #82
Especially rich gay people. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #118
Right on, Scuba! Enthusiast Dec 2014 #106
DOW is at 18,000. How is this possible? Drahthaardogs Dec 2014 #141
It's not insolvency that's the problem, it's legalized larceny. Scuba Dec 2014 #144
The Congress should pass RARP. earthside Dec 2014 #2
There is no need for an increase to corporate taxes to fund that. cstanleytech Dec 2014 #3
+1 ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #20
And some poor kid will get shot today for jaywalking. Flatulo Dec 2014 #27
These pension plans have absolutely nothing to do with your post. former9thward Dec 2014 #43
I know that ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #50
Quite the allegation? former9thward Dec 2014 #55
Perhaps you didn't note that you're ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #58
You questioned my claim former9thward Dec 2014 #62
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #65
I gave you two links from today. former9thward Dec 2014 #68
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #69
Las Vegas was an example. former9thward Dec 2014 #70
A 40 year old example ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #71
"there was a time" former9thward Dec 2014 #72
Because Unions still maintain ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #74
Ah yes, when it comes to violent crime blame the mexicans and the blacks Drahthaardogs Dec 2014 #143
What are you smoking? former9thward Dec 2014 #147
You used the term "mobbed up", which tells me you watched "Jersey Boys" Drahthaardogs Dec 2014 #150
Ok, never any Mafia in the unions. former9thward Dec 2014 #153
Robert Kennedy? You are seriously talking about shit that happened when Robert Kennedy was alive? Drahthaardogs Dec 2014 #161
It is clear you have no idea what this thread is about. former9thward Dec 2014 #162
I know exactly what this post is about. Drahthaardogs Dec 2014 #168
Well, I don't wonder about your motives... former9thward Dec 2014 #169
Wall St raided more $ from pensions than managers ever did Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #79
You can post your own links. former9thward Dec 2014 #84
Most do put it in Wall St Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #85
Lets try this again Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #91
Your wife has an employer based pension plan. former9thward Dec 2014 #97
When did your reading comprehension drop? Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #101
You are reduced to grade school insults. former9thward Dec 2014 #110
Only because you don't understand the conversation Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #111
What about the employer sponsored plans, there are hundreds doc03 Dec 2014 #175
Did you even read this? Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #104
Wrong. and no, you didn't read. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #117
No one sees the bigger picture here Red Knight Dec 2014 #95
Exactly. former9thward Dec 2014 #99
How about right wing attacks for 70 years? Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #112
Last 70 years? former9thward Dec 2014 #113
Yet over 50% of the population still support unions Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #114
Global competition isn't the reason there's less US employment in steel. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #121
Lower wages???? LOL former9thward Dec 2014 #127
Salary of Steel Plant Workers according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #128
Where are the figures from past years? former9thward Dec 2014 #130
40-year-slump Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #138
Not surprising you are trying to change the subject. former9thward Dec 2014 #139
Did you see reply #138 yet? Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #140
Yes, you need to defend the claim instead of changing the subject. former9thward Dec 2014 #145
It is in the post Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #148
Not going silent. former9thward Dec 2014 #152
WHY OH WHY Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #154
You post a lot of good stuff on labor. former9thward Dec 2014 #155
And your UNNAMED friends and LINKS you don't provide mean so much IN YOUR MIND! Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #157
Desdpite your wishes you don't get to dictate who posts on DU. former9thward Dec 2014 #159
Post a redacted pay stub minus your name Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #160
Pay stubs from the 70s and 80s? former9thward Dec 2014 #163
Redact your Social Security statement or tell us the mill you worked at... Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #164
I have posted many times former9thward Dec 2014 #165
Local 1033 folded? Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #166
Why don't you call up District 7 and ask them? former9thward Dec 2014 #170
After the holidays Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #172
Happy Holidays to you. former9thward Dec 2014 #174
Thousands who worked at LTV Steel lose benefits (2002) Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #167
Yes, when your company goes bankrupt you lose benefits and jobs. former9thward Dec 2014 #171
Here is one I helped picket (2008) for the USW that was also lost, company still in business Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #173
Yes, inflation-adjusted lower wages. And yes, employment is less because of labor-saving NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #129
You don't know what you are talking about. former9thward Dec 2014 #131
They are lower, and Omaha Steve just cited BLS stats to prove it. It's you who doesn't know NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #132
His stats are from 2011. former9thward Dec 2014 #133
oh for god's sake. yeah, 2011 is sooooo different from today. why, wages have gone up in NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #134
You said wages are lower than the 60s. former9thward Dec 2014 #137
There is a link to support his comments in reply # 138 Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #142
Nope, it does not. former9thward Dec 2014 #146
OOPS on your part Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #149
Bullshit. former9thward Dec 2014 #156
PROVE IT! Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #158
tHE US produces more steel today than it did in the 60s. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #123
Global competition my foot. There is no global competition, just the simulcra of competition. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #120
I know your line too. former9thward Dec 2014 #135
your line is just bullshit. "my friends make..." "i made.." -- it's just bullshit. you haven't NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #177
"I am merely funding the retirees who went before me--I'll never collect." NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #119
Crap like this is why defined benefit pensions are doomed. Adrahil Dec 2014 #181
What are multi-employer pension plans? Frustratedlady Dec 2014 #4
These are not public worker pensions Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #13
Wow, I know several people who were employed at a number of these places. closeupready Dec 2014 #19
Wow! That's a bunch. Frustratedlady Dec 2014 #24
How aware are 99% of people especially with consolidated media controlling 90% of TV, radio and appalachiablue Dec 2014 #59
Many of those have been gone for years if not decades Bandit Dec 2014 #67
But there are still retirees or survivor spouses/dependants entitled to benefits Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #73
Fixing 30 yr old underfunding is a problem One_Life_To_Give Dec 2014 #109
"But the tables were wrong, as people lived longer" NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #122
You can find out about multi-employer pension plans here... PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #75
OK, that's kind of what I figured out in my mind, but wasn't sure. Frustratedlady Dec 2014 #81
So, where'd all the money go? NBachers Dec 2014 #5
The Cayman Islands and Switzerland mb999 Dec 2014 #16
they have 18 billion the problem is (they say) is that for every worker there are 4 retirees(iirc) belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #31
"they" say a lot of stuff that isn't true. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #178
Up in Wall Street Smoke Sweeney Dec 2014 #37
Some money went all sorts of places. Igel Dec 2014 #39
This is one of newblewtoo Dec 2014 #86
Perhaps you can confirm what I believe I heard about this. All the positions aren't what they might 24601 Dec 2014 #87
The point is, that the government could or should have been able to see this trend far in advance Sweeney Dec 2014 #102
I actually like this, and I think it not far from the truth. Sweeney Dec 2014 #100
Private pensions went up in smoke during the merger frenzy in the 80s Warpy Dec 2014 #77
K&R!! NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #124
'pension funds were suckers for CDO's in the 00's' - yes, that closeupready Dec 2014 #136
How many of these retirees voted Tea Party/Teapublican/GOP? marble falls Dec 2014 #6
lots of dems voted for this, and a democratic president lobbied for it Doctor_J Dec 2014 #9
It's called... HoosierCowboy Dec 2014 #11
It's called BS! SammyWinstonJack Dec 2014 #22
That sausage always comes out big and tasty for Jamie dimon, while our part Doctor_J Dec 2014 #61
No. This isn't regular legislating. This is theft. This is total bullshit. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #107
potus lobbyied specifically for a cut in pensions? got a source for that b/c i didnt hear that belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #32
he lobbied for and signed the entire thing, including the pension cuts Doctor_J Dec 2014 #36
what YOU said was he lobbied for this. meaning he lobbied for the pension cuts now youre belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #38
He knew exactly what was in it. former9thward Dec 2014 #45
yea what i heard him say was 'this is an example of the hard compromise that you get belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #49
If you are not willing to see the government shut down Sweeney Dec 2014 #46
shutting down the government is a big deal dont blame potus for what the left let happen belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #53
The man is no original thinker. Sweeney Dec 2014 #57
Wait. A majority of Democrats voted for this abortion. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #108
NO. I said he lobbied for the budget. Which he did. Doctor_J Dec 2014 #48
"NO. I said he lobbied for the budget." yes he wanted a budget that doesnt mean he wanted belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #52
how did all that figure in his chess game? Skittles Dec 2014 #96
bs NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #179
Obama, Biden, etc all lobbied on this during the recess Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #90
All the unions worked for an end to Communism Sweeney Dec 2014 #44
Yes, the new term is Wage Slavery... wolfie001 Dec 2014 #89
If we do not have enough democracy to keep our commonwealth in the country Sweeney Dec 2014 #98
Like it matters what you little people want...... marmar Dec 2014 #7
Even mice gotta eat Sweeney Dec 2014 #47
Who was regulating/monitoring these plans? One_Life_To_Give Dec 2014 #8
Capitalism is anarchy Sweeney Dec 2014 #51
Is this the needed.... HoosierCowboy Dec 2014 #10
This is theft tk2kewl Dec 2014 #12
That's one reason why I support the post office yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #28
the p.o. pension is so well funded that it has the pensions for people who dont work there yet belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #33
absolutely correct. Sweeney Dec 2014 #56
Co-sponsored by Ted Kennedy and Henry Waxman madville Dec 2014 #64
Those retirees haven't drawn their payments yet. I'm sure Congress critters are Frustratedlady Dec 2014 #83
You don't have a choice, they are coming for your pensions and when you get ill... 951-Riverside Dec 2014 #14
My Carpenters Union pernsion (disability) dotymed Dec 2014 #15
I'm in a union household, and I'm so very sorry this happened to you. shrike Dec 2014 #29
The Union changed my life for the better. dotymed Dec 2014 #176
Promises turbinetree Dec 2014 #17
“White people still ask me why Mookie threw the can through the window,” jtuck004 Dec 2014 #23
And no stirring speech was made on the Senate floor about pensions....Senators don't need the Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #21
Corruption turbinetree Dec 2014 #30
I wondered when the other shoe would drop. People that weren't worried about us current brewens Dec 2014 #34
Also known as the Kline - Miller Ammendment JohnnyRingo Dec 2014 #35
Obviously these companies are not as profitable as the seem, nor govts able to cut taxes as much on point Dec 2014 #40
Cutting pensions in this way is dispicable blackspade Dec 2014 #41
Eventually RobinA Dec 2014 #42
Your government is concerned with its own survival. Sweeney Dec 2014 #54
As I understand it ... aggiesal Dec 2014 #60
completely corrupt at this point. Doctor_J Dec 2014 #63
The comments are really telling on that article hollowdweller Dec 2014 #66
If nobody should expect to have a defined pension, then nobody should trust closeupready Dec 2014 #78
Some of the commentators are clueless in that..... wolfie001 Dec 2014 #88
It is hard for me to understand the idea that upaloopa Dec 2014 #80
of course it's bogus. the last 40 years have been bogus and the next 40 years will be too unless NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #180
"they're going to lose LiberalElite Dec 2014 #92
I tried in the most kind way possible for thirty years to tell people the folly Sweeney Dec 2014 #103
Just wondering LiberalElite Dec 2014 #105
It took a long time to get blacks in the Union Sweeney Dec 2014 #116
Today blacks are more likely to belong to unions than whites. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #125
Are they going to cut Congressional pensions too? B Calm Dec 2014 #93
What's good for the goose should be good for the gander Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #94
+100 NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #126
Here is some more on this: AFL-CIO on Retirement Security Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #115
This is blatant theft. Odin2005 Dec 2014 #151
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
1. Congress approves plan to allow pension cuts. I expect this of Republicans ...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 10:16 AM
Dec 2014

... but don't Democrats still have a majority in the Senate?



This is why so many of us abhor the Third Way and their corpo-Dems.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
18. Yes. Corporo-Dems say, "They wanted hell, we gave them purgatory,
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:38 AM
Dec 2014

aren't you glad you voted for us!"

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
25. actually the Conservatives control the Senate
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:12 PM
Dec 2014

and people understand this which is why the fakers were kicked out

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
82. Well, Republican ARE worse. They want to cut union pensions, for crying out loud.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:41 PM
Dec 2014

Vote Democratic, because, um, well gays should have equal rights while we all starve to death.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
118. Especially rich gay people.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:31 AM
Dec 2014

"Apple CEO Tim Cook: 'I'm proud to be gay'"

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/10/30/tim-cook-comes-out/18165361/

Poor gay people don't have a lot of assets, so it doesn't really matter if they marry or not.

Which is the reason the poor are less likely to marry generally, and always have been.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
141. DOW is at 18,000. How is this possible?
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:09 PM
Dec 2014

Seriously. More bullshit. It was halfway believable during the recession, but the stock market is soaring. How can funds be on the brink of insolvency?

earthside

(6,960 posts)
2. The Congress should pass RARP.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 10:23 AM
Dec 2014

'Retirement Asset Recovery Program'.

If the federal government can bailout the banks with TARP, it can do the same for regular American folks, right?

Such a program could be funded with an increase in the corporate tax rate.

Of course, we all know that contracts are sacred in America ... except when they are made between employers/owners and workers and labor.

And we also know that for the sake of politics and budget deals, workers still have to take in on the chin while banks get a new safety net at our expense.

What a country, uh?

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
3. There is no need for an increase to corporate taxes to fund that.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 10:32 AM
Dec 2014

Rather closing the loopholes many companies are exploiting to avoid paying taxes altogether could provide the needed the funding.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
20. +1 ...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:53 AM
Dec 2014

That plus, clawing back, the pension assets that hedge funds raided as a part of their post-purchase "re-organizations"/"restructurings."

I quick review of the hedge fund business model (as noted during the Romney campaign) was to borrow money to purchase an enterprise, based on the assets of said enterprise (loading up said enterprise with debt), strip out the assets of said enterprise ... including pension funds ... and walk away, leaving said enterprise with unsustainable debt and few assets ... all while the hedge fund charging said enterprise an enormous fee.

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
27. And some poor kid will get shot today for jaywalking.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:17 PM
Dec 2014

We've made a very wrong left turn somewhere, and I don't think anyone knows the way back.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
43. These pension plans have absolutely nothing to do with your post.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:21 PM
Dec 2014

These are union controlled multi-employer pension plans. If there was any raiding it was done by the union managers of the plans. And yes, some raiding was done as with the Teamsters. That union raided their pension plan to give "loans" to mob controlled casinos and hotels in Las Vegas. They called it "investments". Now the Teamster Central States pension plan has 5 retirees for every current worker. Unsustainable. Where is the money going to come from???

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
50. I know that ...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:42 PM
Dec 2014

I was merely presenting a funding mechanism for keeping these pension plans solvent.

That union raided their pension plan to give "loans" to mob controlled casinos and hotels in Las Vegas.


That is quite the allegation ... perhaps you can support it with something, not from a movie of the week.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
55. Quite the allegation?
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:54 PM
Dec 2014

Well a lot of people in prison might dispute that, including Jimmy Hoffa if he had not been killed by his mob buddies, since he went to prison because of it.

Once nicknamed "the mob's bank," the Teamsters Union's Central States, Southeast, Southwest Areas Pension Fund, based in Chicago, played a major—and infamous—role in the rapid expansion of the Las Vegas hotel-casino industry following World War II. From 1958 to 1977, the pension fund's almost $250 million worth of low-interest loans to casino developers, many with ties to organized crime, brought unprecedented growth to the Las Vegas Strip and the city's downtown. In return, the crime groups reaped untold millions in secretly skimmed profits. -

See more at: http://www.onlinenevada.org/articles/central-states-southeast-southwest-areas-pension-fund#sthash.sfBmWlMG.dpuf

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
62. You questioned my claim
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 02:43 PM
Dec 2014

that mob controlled unions made so-called loans to mob controlled Vegas casinos. You said that was "quite the allegation." Now you shift and say "well that was four decades ago"..

You think there is no mob influence in unions? It has never left the Teamsters. The Laborers Union is mobbed up. As is the Longshore Union in the south and east coasts.

While the press and federal !law enforcers have focused on criminal influence inside our biggest union, the Teamsters, the Mafia cancer has spread, virtually unimpeded, in other important unions-including the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union (Culinary Workers) and the International Longshoremen's Association, both affiliated with the AFL-CIO.

http://www.laborers.org/Digest_12-78.html

Fresh from a record mob takedown, the feds have targeted one of the city's most important construction unions for some Mafia housecleaning, sources said.

Brooklyn U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch's investigators have begun plotting strategies to break the Gambino crime family's 50-year stranglehold on the Pavers and Road Builders District Council, the sources said.


http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/brooklyn-da-feds-smoke-mob-influences-liuna-union-article-1.122926

But don't worry folks, nothing to see here, move along, it was all "4 decades ago".....

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
65. LOL ...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 03:16 PM
Dec 2014

citing something from 40 years ago, certainly supports your claim that mob-connected Union Bosses are raiding pension funds today.

Airighty then!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
69. Yes ...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 04:04 PM
Dec 2014

the links indicate Union/Mob ties; but do they point to the Union Bosses raiding pension plans to "loan" to mobbed up casinos?

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
70. Las Vegas was an example.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 04:12 PM
Dec 2014

What interest do you think the Mob has in unions? Do you think they are just dying to become Longshoremen?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
71. A 40 year old example ...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 04:19 PM
Dec 2014

that's my point.

What interest do you think the Mob has in unions?


While, there was a time that Unions controlled sectors of industries.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
72. "there was a time"
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 04:38 PM
Dec 2014

So, why now? Do you think no unions are mobbed up? Why are mobs in unions now? Is the Brooklyn U.S. Attorney just making things up?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
74. Because Unions still maintain ...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 04:50 PM
Dec 2014

influence in some sectors of industry. And this influence allows them easy entry into those industries and bleed them dry.

We know this ...

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
143. Ah yes, when it comes to violent crime blame the mexicans and the blacks
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:15 PM
Dec 2014

when it comes to white collar crimes blame the Sicilians and the Jews.

This shit gets old.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
150. You used the term "mobbed up", which tells me you watched "Jersey Boys"
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:55 PM
Dec 2014

and also tells me you know absolutely nothing about Mafia.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
161. Robert Kennedy? You are seriously talking about shit that happened when Robert Kennedy was alive?
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:19 PM
Dec 2014

All the shit that has gone on under Reagan, Bush, Son of Bush and you equate the problems with pensions to the mafia? Not the corporate whoring of America, not the destructions of labor, not the fucked up free trade agreements, not the Neo-Cons, the or the Third Way Democrats. No, you choose to blame it on the la cosa nostra.


And for the record, old man Joe Kennedy was a crook, a womanizer, and a Nazi sympathizer. The Kennedys have been just as crooked as any mobster real or imagined.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
168. I know exactly what this post is about.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 04:22 PM
Dec 2014

My concern here is how you can blame the Sicilians for pension funds in the year 2014. It makes me seriously wonder about your motives.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
169. Well, I don't wonder about your motives...
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 04:39 PM
Dec 2014

I did not "blame the Sicilians for pension funds in the year 2014". The poster I replied to wanted an example of union mis-managed pension funds. I gave him the example of Teamsters and Las Vegas which is an historical fact whether you like it or not.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
79. Wall St raided more $ from pensions than managers ever did
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:18 PM
Dec 2014

You seem to think every union is crooked or in bed with the mafia. That is not the case. Or you would see behind the scenes strings being pulled for mass unionization. Thank about it for awhile.

Is it better to be robbed by Wall St than by the Mafia?

Most pensions are not under control of the unions BTW.

Then there are those that never even put contract required $ into the pension fund like San Diego.

Gov Christie took from the union pension funds. He is getting sued for it. IF you have a link he is tied to the Mafia please post it ASAP!!!!

OS

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
84. You can post your own links.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:58 PM
Dec 2014

Pensions not under control of unions are not part of this bill. Public pensions, whether it is San Diego or NJ, are not part of this bill. The only way Wall Street can raid a pension is if that pension invests in Wall Street.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
91. Lets try this again
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 10:28 PM
Dec 2014

My wife is entitled to a private union pension through the CWA. It has been over funded and not been destroyed when Northwestern Bell became US West. Then US West to Quest. Then Quest to Century link. That all started with the Bell System break up in 1983.

The CWA has many pensions across the USA in all 50 states. The CWA has no control over how the $ are invested. Trustees are elected and are not necessarily union stooges. Investment advisers are hired by the board of trustees. To be over funded for many years, I guess it is well run then?

Can we now agree NOT ALL multi-employer, defined benefit pension plans are run by the union?

Then we can go over other things like the example only I used above with San Diego about employers not funding the pension as required to begin with.

OS

http://www.cwa-union.org/pages/cwa_pensions_and_trusts


CWA/ITU NEGOTIATED PENSION PLAN (NPP) The CWA/ITU Negotiated Pension Plan (NPP) is a multi-employer, defined benefit pension plan that is available to any CWA bargaining unit. It is funded by employer contributions negotiated in the contract. The Plan was started in 1968 and has paid over $1 billion in benefits. For more information about NPP on our Web site, click here.

Read more at: http://www.cwa-union.org/pages/cwa_pensions_and_trusts (below)


The following target investment asset allocation, as set forth in the Plan's investment policy, provides diversification and is intended to meet the Plan's long-term investment goals without undue risk. The investment policy was developed and is continually monitored by the Board of Trustees together with its investment adviser, Gallagher Fiduciary Advisor's.

Equities 50%: (Domestic - 35%, International - 15%) The stock portfolios are managed by selected professional investment management firms and diversified among growth and value styles or invested in index funds.

Fixed Income 20%: Diversified among government securities, investment grade corporate bonds, high yield bonds, mortgage securities, non-U.S. bonds and absolute return strategies, and managed by specialist bond investment management firms.

Real Estate 10%: Diversified among real estate sectors and managed by professional real estate firms in three different commingled funds.

Alternate Strategies 9%: The Plan uses a hedge fund of funds, which invests in approximately 30 individual hedge funds, to diversify across various strategies and among numerous selected hedge fund firms. The fund of funds manager uses its expertise to select the most suitable hedge funds, construct the portfolio and monitor performance. The Plan also invests in a credit long/short fund.

Private Equity 5%: The Plan uses professional investment management firms to select and monitor the private equity investments. Currently, the Plan is invested in 12 partnerships, each of which invests in numerous privately owned companies or in mezzanine debt

Commodities 6%: The Plan uses an enhanced index, long-only single strategy fund run by a specialist commodities manager.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
97. Your wife has an employer based pension plan.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:05 AM
Dec 2014

Not affected by this bill. The fact that several different companies have bought out other companies does not change anything. When they buy a company they buy the pension plan. This bill affects multi-employer pension plans. That is a worker -- lets say a Teamster might deliver freight for one company this week and an another company the next week. As part of the wages each company pays the Union some amount into their pension plan which the union controls.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
101. When did your reading comprehension drop?
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:20 AM
Dec 2014

Go back and reread what I posted about CWA multi-employer plans. It refutes what you seem to think about ALL union multi plans are run by the Mafia!

Dead horse warning!

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
111. Only because you don't understand the conversation
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:15 PM
Dec 2014

I post a link to the CWA about the exact kind of pension in the conversation, and your reply indicates you didn't read it or understand it. It wasn't an insult. It was a comment.

You don't answer questions about your point of view either.

At least I admit when something is over my head or I'm wrong.

OS

doc03

(35,338 posts)
175. What about the employer sponsored plans, there are hundreds
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 05:04 PM
Dec 2014

that have been dumped on the PBGC because they were underfunded. I suppose that know it all blames the Unions for that!

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
104. Did you even read this?
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 06:28 AM
Dec 2014

IF you can't see multi-employer then I give up. YOU don't get it!


CWA/ITU NEGOTIATED PENSION PLAN (NPP) The CWA/ITU Negotiated Pension Plan (NPP) is a multi-employer, defined benefit pension plan
that is available to any CWA bargaining unit. It is funded by employer contributions negotiated in the contract. The Plan was started in 1968 and has paid over $1 billion in benefits. For more information about NPP on our Web site, click here.



http://blog.ogletreedeakins.com/congress-passes-fy-2015-omnibus-appropriations-bill-what-it-means-for-labor-and-employment-agencies-2/

The Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendment

House Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline and Ranking Member George Miller introduced an amendment to the Omnibus Appropriations bill that would provide comprehensive multiemployer pension reform. The Kline-Miller Amendment will give plan trustees the option to cut vested benefits in order to save plans that are headed toward insolvency and will increase plan premiums to the financially-troubled Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). The agency’s multiemployer pension program is projected to become insolvent within the next 10 years.

The amendment does not mandate cuts, but instead gives trustees the option to cut benefits if a cut will prevent the plan from becoming insolvent. At the moment, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974, trustees cannot cut benefits that have already been earned.

The National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans’s proposal, “Solutions Not Bailouts,” was the basis for the Kline-Miller Amendment. In the weeks leading up to the amendment, the AARP, the Pension Rights Center, and some unions, including the Teamsters and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, objected to the negotiations.

The Kline-Miller Amendment makes permanent the multiemployer provisions under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which had been scheduled to sunset at the end of 2014. In addition, it addresses the authority of the PBGC to facilitate plan mergers, allows plan sponsors to apply to the PBGC to partition a plan, and increases the PBGC premium for multiemployer plans to $26 per person (with future increases based on the wage index). It also allows for benefit suspensions in certain plans in critical status.

In addition, the Kline-Miller Amendment includes a provision that redefines a cessation of operations under ERISA section 4062(e). This change in definition is meant to decrease the number of plan sponsors impacted by ERISA section 4062(e). The Omnibus Appropriations bill also prohibits the use of funds for the PBGC to take any action under ERISA section 4062(e).

Unfortunately, while the Kline-Miller amendment is designed to reduce multiemployer pension plan insolvencies for underfunded plans, it does not reduce the staggering legacy withdrawal liability that, in some cases, exceeds a company’s entire net worth. The Omnibus bill also dropped a rider that would have prohibited EBSA from moving forward with new regulations on the definition of “fiduciary.”

The Kline-Miller amendment is a response to the fear that employers would rush to leave plans next year if nothing were done. Chairman Kline was quoted as saying at a House Rules Committee meeting on the amendment, “We cannot let this opportunity pass by hoping we will get a better deal in the future. By acting now we can deliver retirees greater protections that might not be available down the road.”


 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
117. Wrong. and no, you didn't read.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:27 AM
Dec 2014

"CWA/ITU NEGOTIATED PENSION PLAN (NPP) The CWA/ITU Negotiated Pension Plan (NPP) is a multi-employer, defined benefit pension plan that is available to any CWA bargaining unit."

His wife's is a multi-employer plan. As might be guessed by the union name: Communication workers of America = many different employers.

Red Knight

(704 posts)
95. No one sees the bigger picture here
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:36 PM
Dec 2014

As unions die out these pensions are in big trouble. I see it with mine. I am merely funding the retirees who went before me--I'll never collect. It's always listed as underfunded and as more guys retire and with less union guys to pay into the pension it can't last.

So what happens to the guy, like me--throwing money into a pension that will be bankrupt?

If it's in trouble isn't it more fair for everyone to sacrifice some?

Why are the few workers putting into it asked to basically give everything and know they'll get nothing?

Sorry---it's a shared thing.

It may suck--but everyone should share that cut.

Unions are dying. That's the big problem.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
99. Exactly.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:09 AM
Dec 2014

Unions are dying because the industries that supported them are dying due to global competition.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
113. Last 70 years?
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:54 PM
Dec 2014

When unions were organized in the 30s right wing attacks were far more fierce than now. Ten steelworkers were shot to death in the field just outside the Republic steel mill in Chicago where I used to work at. That occurred on Memorial Day, 1937. Other unions had similar attacks. They grew anyway.

The steel industry is not gone but very diminished due to global competition. Auto has had the same problems. They took unions down with them.



Memorial Day Massacre, Chicago, 1937.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
114. Yet over 50% of the population still support unions
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:22 PM
Dec 2014

STILL under attack!!!

Americans Approve of Unions but Support "Right to Work"

Union approval at 53% while 71% favor right-to-work laws: http://www.gallup.com/poll/175556/americans-approve-unions-support-right-work.aspx


SHAILA DEWANDEC. 18, 2014 Foes of Unions Try Their Luck in County Laws: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/19/us/politics/foes-of-unions-try-their-luck-in-county-laws.html


By Perry ChiaramontePublished October 19, 2014 Union enrollment plummets for Wisconsin teachers under tough law: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/10/19/one-third-wisconsin-teachers-have-dropped-union-since-gov-walker-ended/


By Reid Wilson December 3 (2014) After Republican wins, right to work bills on the agenda: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/12/03/after-republican-wins-right-to-work-bills-on-the-agenda/

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
121. Global competition isn't the reason there's less US employment in steel.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:07 AM
Dec 2014

The US produces more steel today than it did in 1969 & employs way fewer people, at lower wages. That's deliberate and nothing to do with 'competition'. And the 'competion' is deliberately created, the better for a few people to game the system.







former9thward

(32,009 posts)
127. Lower wages???? LOL
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 12:44 PM
Dec 2014

They produce with less people because of technology. Their wages are much higher. I left the industry in 1988 but still have friends working and they all make in the $70,000 to $90,000 range.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
128. Salary of Steel Plant Workers according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:14 PM
Dec 2014

Your friends must be in management, engineering, or lying according to this.

http://work.chron.com/salary-steel-plant-workers-2958.html

Snip: Salary Range
Steel mills employed 87,970 people as of May 2011, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. These workers earned a mean annual wage of $49,050. Job categories included 3,350 managers, who earned an average of $113,770 a year, and 160 building and grounds maintenance workers, whose average wage was less than a third of managerial wages, at $31,640.

Top Salaries
Most of the jobs that paid an average in excess of $100,000 were management positions, according to the bureau, including plant operations managers, who made $136,600 on average, and industrial production managers, who made $101,940 on average. Among other types of work that employed at least 1,000 steelworkers, engineering jobs paid $69,180 on average, while financial jobs paid $62,620 on average.


Most Popular Jobs
The two types of jobs that employed the largest number of steelworkers, according to the bureau, were the production occupations, with 41,820 workers -- nearly half of all steel plant employees -- and the installation and maintenance jobs for equipment, with 16,640 workers. The installation and maintenance jobs paid $48,260 per year on average, while the production jobs paid $43,120 yearly. Rolling machine operators were the most prevalent single position, with 10,240 people employed in those jobs. Their average wage was $42,750.

Bottom Salaries
Among the positions that employed at least 1,000 people in steel mills, the lowest-paying were usually unskilled labor. For instance, the 3,300 production helpers working in steel plants were the lowest-paid workers, at $31,450 on average, according to the bureau. The 2,490 laborers and movers were paid $35,050 on average.

References (3)
About the Author
Eric Strauss spent 12 years as a newspaper copy editor, eventually serving as a deputy business editor at "The Star-Ledger" in New Jersey before transitioning into academic communications. His byline has appeared in several newspapers and websites. Strauss holds a B.A. in creative writing/professional writing and recently earned an M.A. in English literature.


former9thward

(32,009 posts)
130. Where are the figures from past years?
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:26 PM
Dec 2014

The poster I was replying to said they were making less. Every member of the United Steelworkers Union, that work in steel mills, would laugh at that. They know best.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
138. 40-year-slump
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:52 PM
Dec 2014

AT LINK!


http://prospect.org/article/40-year-slump

The largest strike in American history, in terms of work hours lost, occurred in 1959, when 500,000 steelworkers walked off the job for 116 days to secure increased wages and improved health and pension coverage.

The industrial Midwest never recovered. Between 1979 and 1983, 2.4 million manufacturing jobs vanished. The number of U.S. steelworkers went from 450,000 at the start of the 1980s to 170,000 at decade’s end, even as the wages of those who remained shrank by 17 percent.

Offshoring has had an even broader effect on the jobs that have remained behind. Alan Blinder, the Princeton economist who was vice chairman of the Federal Reserve in the 1990s, has estimated that roughly 25 percent of all American jobs are potentially offshorable, from producing steel to writing software to drafting contracts. This has placed a ceiling on wages in these and myriad other occupations that can be sent overseas.

In many industries, the increase in productivity has exceeded Perry’s estimates. “Thirty years ago, it took ten hours per worker to produce one ton of steel,” said U.S. Steel CEO John Surma in 2011. “Today, it takes two hours.”

In conventional economic theory, those productivity increases should have resulted in sizable pay increases for workers. Where conventional economic theory flounders is its failure to factor in the power of management and stockholders and the weakness of labor. Sociologist Tali Kristal has documented that the share of revenues going to wages and benefits in manufacturing has declined by 14 percent since 1970, while the share going to profits has correspondingly increased. She found similar shifts in transportation, where labor’s share has been reduced by 10 percent, and construction, where it has been cut by 5 percent. What these three sectors have in common is that their rate of unionization has been cut in half during the past four decades. All of which is to say, gains in productivity have been apportioned by the simple arithmetic of power.

Only if the suppression of labor’s power is made part of the equation can the overall decline in good jobs over the past 35 years be explained. Only by considering the waning of worker power can we understand why American corporations, sitting on more than $1.5 trillion in unexpended cash, have used those funds to buy back stock and increase dividends but almost universally failed even to consider raising their workers’ wages.

What has vanished over the past 40 years isn’t just Americans’ rising incomes. It’s their sense of control over their lives. The young college graduates working in jobs requiring no more than a high-school degree, the middle-aged unemployed who have permanently opted out of a labor market that has no place for them, the 45- to 60-year-olds who say they will have to delay their retirement because they have insufficient savings—all these and more are leading lives that have diverged from the aspirations that Americans until recently believed they could fulfill. This May, a Pew poll asked respondents if they thought that today’s children would be better or worse off than their parents. Sixty-two percent said worse off, while 33 percent said better. Studies that document the decline of intergenerational mobility suggest that this newfound pessimism is well grounded.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
139. Not surprising you are trying to change the subject.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:56 PM
Dec 2014

The poster, who you are trying to defend, says steelworkers now make less then they did in the 60s. Where are the figures to back up this ridiculous claim????

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
145. Yes, you need to defend the claim instead of changing the subject.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:43 PM
Dec 2014

#138 is a generalized article about American workers. Defend the claim that Steelworkers make less now than they did in the 60s.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
148. It is in the post
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:49 PM
Dec 2014

Generalization? The number of U.S. steelworkers went from 450,000 at the start of the 1980s to 170,000 at decade’s end, even as the wages of those who remained shrank by 17 percent.

I see you don't post links to your friends phone #'s so we can call and talk to their inside knowledge you mention! You don't post links when your bested either. Then when you get called on it, you go in silent mode.

OS



former9thward

(32,009 posts)
155. You post a lot of good stuff on labor.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:00 PM
Dec 2014

But sometimes you really go off the deep end. Ideology wins over accuracy.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
157. And your UNNAMED friends and LINKS you don't provide mean so much IN YOUR MIND!
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:04 PM
Dec 2014

Now go find some other place (not the DU) to play at.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
159. Desdpite your wishes you don't get to dictate who posts on DU.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:09 PM
Dec 2014

My unnamed friends. LOL What I supposed to do? Put their names and phone numbers online so you can harass them? No thanks. I started in the mill in 1974 and was making $3.25 a hour. When I finished in 1988 I was making $55,000 a year with much better benefits. But I guess I was just dreaming about that.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
160. Post a redacted pay stub minus your name
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:11 PM
Dec 2014

Or any kind of link in support of your off base opinion. Silly you.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
163. Pay stubs from the 70s and 80s?
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:27 PM
Dec 2014

LOL. I am not that anal to keep that crap. BTW I just emailed the author of your article asking where he got his information. I will let you know if he ever responds since nowhere in his article does he give any information on his 'sources'.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
164. Redact your Social Security statement or tell us the mill you worked at...
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:30 PM
Dec 2014

No link, no friends, no proof of squat!



former9thward

(32,009 posts)
165. I have posted many times
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:40 PM
Dec 2014

that I worked at Republic Steel in Chicago. 11200 S. Burley Ave. 60617, if that makes you happy. It became LTV Steel eventually. I was Chairman of the Local (1033) from 1979 -1988. I negotiated all local contracts and went to Pittsburgh countless times to be a part of the national contract negotiations.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
170. Why don't you call up District 7 and ask them?
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 04:44 PM
Dec 2014

Surely your cell phone has free long distance. Everyone's else does. Although back in those days it was District 31 with district directors Ed Sadlowski, Jim Balanoff and Jack Parton in my times. Yes it folded. Due mainly to the dumping of subsidized foreign steel -- although other posters in this thread who don't know what they are talking about ---- claim was no problem.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
172. After the holidays
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 04:49 PM
Dec 2014

I too have friends in the USW. But most will be off the next week or so.

In the meantime, I'm sorry if I misjudged you.

Happy holidays (in solidarity),

OS

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
174. Happy Holidays to you.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 04:58 PM
Dec 2014

Unfortunately this medium is not good for getting to know people. And writing short sentences for posts can lead to all sorts of misunderstandings. But that is the limitations of a discussion board. I would rather do it over a couple, or more, beers in a blue collar dive bar. Which I have doing my entire adult (and a little before) life. lol

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
167. Thousands who worked at LTV Steel lose benefits (2002)
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 04:03 PM
Dec 2014

Lost job AND benefits.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-04-01/news/0204010207_1_ltv-steel-health-care-coverage-loss-of-health-insurance

April 01, 2002|By Stephen Franklin, Tribune staff reporter.

Thousands of Illinois and Indiana steelworkers--many suffering the health consequences of years spent working at hot, gritty and dangerous jobs--will be cut off from health-care benefits as of Monday.

They are the former employees of bankrupt LTV Steel Co., the giant Cleveland-based steelmaker that began to shut down its mills in December. The company that bought the idled plants did not assume responsibility for LTV's health-care costs.

Amid all that the steelworkers have suffered during decades of shrinkage in the industry, the loss of health insurance is particularly painful, especially for those too young to qualify for Medicare, too bedeviled by medical problems to easily find a new insurer or too strapped to afford insurance on their own.

John Wilson, 57, a burly steelworker from Chicago's South Side, is among those facing difficult choices. With insurance premiums running into hundreds of dollars, he says he will risk going without until August, when he can sign up on his wife's health-care coverage.

FULL story at link.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
171. Yes, when your company goes bankrupt you lose benefits and jobs.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 04:47 PM
Dec 2014

I worked 16 years there and get a grand total of $131 a month for a pension from the PBGC.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
173. Here is one I helped picket (2008) for the USW that was also lost, company still in business
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 04:54 PM
Dec 2014

http://globegazette.com/news/local/pipe-maker-locks-out-union-workers-after-rejected-contracts/article_867be010-4ad7-5317-8419-8c08e9106853.html

Pipe maker locks out union workers after rejected contracts

January 28, 2008 12:00 am

COUNCIL BLUFFS, Iowa (AP) — A manufacturer of iron water pipes locked out 270 union workers today after three contract offers were rejected.

The Griffin Pipe Products Co. factory in Council Bluffs was operating with 70 salaried employees after the company turned away the union workers who are members of the United Steelworkers Local 3141 beginning at midnight Sunday.

“We've been negotiating for about four months now and have not reached an agreement, unfortunately,” Ron Bland, human resources manager for Griffin Pipe, said on Monday. “We had a work stoppage at midnight last night.”

The contract between the company and the union expired Nov. 7 and three proposed agreements have been rejected.

FULL story at link.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
129. Yes, inflation-adjusted lower wages. And yes, employment is less because of labor-saving
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:19 PM
Dec 2014

technology, not foreign competition. The US produces more steel than it did in its glory days.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
131. You don't know what you are talking about.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:27 PM
Dec 2014

Foreign competition killed off many mills and companies in the 70s and 80s. No, wages are NOT lower. Ridiculous.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
132. They are lower, and Omaha Steve just cited BLS stats to prove it. It's you who doesn't know
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:37 PM
Dec 2014

what you're talking about.

The US produces more steel than it ever did, so apparently 'foreign competition' hasn't hurt the mills much. But it was a good cover story to bankrupt, restructure, and screw the workers.

Which you apparently like.

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
133. His stats are from 2011.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:41 PM
Dec 2014

Where are the stats from previous years??? Why don't you link to them since you are making the ridiculous claim??? I worked at a steel mill??? Did you, since you claim to know all about it?? I still have many friends working in the industry. I know what they are making. Do you?

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
134. oh for god's sake. yeah, 2011 is sooooo different from today. why, wages have gone up in
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:42 PM
Dec 2014

leaps and bounds.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
142. There is a link to support his comments in reply # 138
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:10 PM
Dec 2014

You got a link that says different other than your friends still in the business quote?

Click on this at the link and you will see benefits have gone down too

OS

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
149. OOPS on your part
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:50 PM
Dec 2014

AGAIN for the Third TIME: The number of U.S. steelworkers went from 450,000 at the start of the 1980s to 170,000 at decade’s end, even as the wages of those who remained shrank by 17 percent.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
158. PROVE IT!
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 03:06 PM
Dec 2014

I've got verifiable link info on my side. YOU only seem to have BS and imaginary friends on your side so far.
 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
123. tHE US produces more steel today than it did in the 60s.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:25 AM
Dec 2014

And just because the capitalist attack on unions was more obviously violent in the 30s doesn't mean it was more effective.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
120. Global competition my foot. There is no global competition, just the simulcra of competition.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:47 AM
Dec 2014

The better to control the peasants with.

Competition is only for the little guys; workers and small companies.

If you think there's really 'competition,' ask yourself where the formerly non-existent 'money' that bailed out the world banks came from.

But in fact, I've read you long enough here to know your line.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
177. your line is just bullshit. "my friends make..." "i made.." -- it's just bullshit. you haven't
Mon Dec 29, 2014, 01:10 AM
Dec 2014

linked a single source.

you're full of it.

steve & I have linked mainstream articles, bls statistics, and other information.

you got nothing.

and as for failed ideologies: the majority of the world's population is capitalist. the majority of the world's population is poor. and the rich are richer than ever.

and you're running interference for them.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
119. "I am merely funding the retirees who went before me--I'll never collect."
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 01:39 AM
Dec 2014

Young people also saying that about social security, like it's inevitable and nothing to do with them.

"It may suck--but everyone should share that cut."

Why? The people you're funding paid their dues already and paid for those before you, and more than that, fought for the rights they have. Why don't you instead of whining about how you're not going to get anything?

"Unions are dying. That's the big problem."

Why is that, do you think? Maybe the apathy of folks like yourself has something to do with it? Maybe the stupidity of believing that unions just 'die' without cause?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
181. Crap like this is why defined benefit pensions are doomed.
Mon Dec 29, 2014, 10:58 AM
Dec 2014

About 10 years ago when job hunting, I had offers from 2 companies. One had a defined benefit plan, but frankly, I can smell the stench of death around them, so I went with other company.

Sure enough, 5 years ago, that company kills it's pension gives it's employees and retirees a one time "fair" pay out (which was good for maybe 2 years worth of modest living expenses in today's cash), and fuck you very much.

I do not trust pensions. This game is rigged. 401k's may have some risk, but so did that pension that evaporated.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
4. What are multi-employer pension plans?
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 10:33 AM
Dec 2014

Are these union-based or does this include state pension plans usually for state workers, teachers...basically, public employees?

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
13. These are not public worker pensions
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:08 AM
Dec 2014

At the far right: http://www.pbgc.gov/wr/trusteed/plans.html

Quick Search (Large Plans, A-Z)

Allegheny Health, Education & Research

Allis Chalmers

Amcast Industrial Corporation

Anchor Glass

Arrow Automotive

Bethlehem Steel

Bradlees

Caldor Corporation

Circuit City

Collins & Aikman

Cone Mills

Consolidated Freightways

Delphi Corporation

Delta Pilots

Dewey & LeBoeuf

Durango Apparel

Eastern Air Lines

Fairchild Corporation

Fleming

Foamex LP

Forum Health

Grand Union

Hartmarx Corporation

Harvard Industries

Hawker Beechcraft

Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.

Henry I. Siegel Co.

J. A. Jones

Jacobson Stores

Kaiser Aluminum

Kaiser Steel

Kemper

Lehman Brothers

LTV Steel

McCulloch

Metaldyne Corporation

Milacron Inc.

National Steel

Nortel Networks, Inc.

Northwestern Steel and Wire

Outboard Marine

Pan Am

Payless Cashways

Penn Traffic

Petrie

Piccadilly Cafeterias

Pillowtex

Polaroid

Reliance Insurance

Republic Technologies

Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers

Singer Company

Thorn Apple Valley

TWA

UMM

United Airlines

United Merchants and Manufacturers

US Airways

Weirton Steel

Westpoint Stevens

Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
19. Wow, I know several people who were employed at a number of these places.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:40 AM
Dec 2014

And at least one of them I know for certain is Republican (a family member).

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
24. Wow! That's a bunch.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:02 PM
Dec 2014

Many more steps like this and they will have a public uprising. They can't continue punishing the 99% without some push back.

Thanks for the reply.

appalachiablue

(41,132 posts)
59. How aware are 99% of people especially with consolidated media controlling 90% of TV, radio and
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 02:19 PM
Dec 2014

print news and the propaganda. Dead peasants that Michel Moore covered in the film, 'Capitalism, A Love Story" have been around a long time. People are struggling much more on the work treadmill, for less just to survive. Real news is so hard to find. Bill Moyers has been an exceptionally terrific journalist reporting on issues of the people, but he's leaving next month. What will it take to create change for the better. At least Sanders and Warren are exposing and fighting. 2nd Robber Baron Age indeed. Thank heaven for DU and members who keep on top of matters. I'll share this info. with a disabled relative on a railroad pension within this giant entity. He was very upset when I mentioned it last week. Fortunately I don't see his co. on the list but that doesn't mean all's clear.

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
73. But there are still retirees or survivor spouses/dependants entitled to benefits
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 04:45 PM
Dec 2014

The the company was sold or went out of business 30 years ago in 1984. If you were 20 when you started working there and worked for 12 years, you would jest be hitting the age to get the benefit you earned while you worked there.

Get the point?

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
109. Fixing 30 yr old underfunding is a problem
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 11:11 AM
Dec 2014

Problem is with mistakes made 30 yrs ago. An employer/union could have put away what was then agreed to be enough money. But the tables were wrong, as people lived longer. So although everyone could have done their part and you would still have a problem today. How do you get a now defunct employer from 30 yrs ago to contribute another 10% plus interest to your pay from back then?

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
122. "But the tables were wrong, as people lived longer"
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:18 AM
Dec 2014

This is a misapprehension. There are no 'tables,' and lifespan trends were laid out well ahead of time and were quite accurate.


In every developed country, the inflation adjusted GDP PER CAPITA has increased dramatically since the last century, yet in these times people everywhere are being told there's "no money" to support infrastructure, services, and even a minimal decent life for human beings.



Why in the fuck do you think that is?

Hint: it has nothing to do with people living minimally longer (which they don't really anyway -- it's partly illusory and has to do more with reduced deaths in childhood. Look at famous people from history; they mostly lived fairly long lives.)

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
75. You can find out about multi-employer pension plans here...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 04:58 PM
Dec 2014

the website of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (a unit of the US Government):
http://www.pbgc.gov/prac/multiemployer/introduction-to-multiemployer-plans.html

A multiemployer plan is a collectively bargained plan maintained by more than one employer, usually within the same or related industries, and a labor union. These plans are often referred to as "Taft-Hartley plans."

Multiemployer Plan Coverage

There are about 1,400 multiemployer defined benefit pension plans, covering about 10 million participants. Many of these participants are employed by small companies in the building and construction industries.

Other industries with significant numbers of workers covered by multiemployer plans are:

retail trade and service industries
manufacturing
mining
trucking and transportation industries, and
entertainment (film, television and theater)




Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
81. OK, that's kind of what I figured out in my mind, but wasn't sure.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:40 PM
Dec 2014

My goodness, that's a lot of people who could lose a goodly portion of their retirement. I can't even imagine getting notice that your pension payment has been cut in half. That could cause some strokes/heart attacks.

Now, to knock them while they're down, cut Social Security and Medicare.

These next two years are going to be excruciating. We'll have to set up 24/7 observers to watch what they are up to before they vote. They will certainly be sneaky.

Thanks for the info.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
31. they have 18 billion the problem is (they say) is that for every worker there are 4 retirees(iirc)
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:36 PM
Dec 2014

the fund is draining and there isnt enough money coming in to keep the pot full. more money going out than coming in

Sweeney

(505 posts)
37. Up in Wall Street Smoke
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:44 PM
Dec 2014

My pension plan lost hundreds of millions of dollars in the stock market crash, and that is just one local union. I heard once that union pension money was 60% of the capital invested in America, and the problem is that too much of that is invested in non-union, anti union, or exported at higher risk overseas. Any union man who bets on the survival of capitalism is too stupid to be trusted with sharp objects.

What are you going to do? Fight back? The country feeds off the young and the old, and the old don't seem to mind when the young are denied their mothers or a decent education and health care in the name of higher profits. Let's prepare ourselves for the shock of seeing old people like myself give up the miserable lives they have to improve the miserable live of some one else. Such self sacrifice is not in our nature. Many of us knew it was pie in the sky when it was sold to us. Now it is time to eat shit and die.

Without the threat of communism, they can do this to organized labor. The next step is to means test social security so they can cut us out of it. We worked for our money. We were called every rotten name in the book for organizing. This problem is the problem of high profits evading fair taxes. This problem is the result of too much export of our economy so that it will not longer support the population. This is your government unwilling to enforce its own laws, and make good its own guarantees. What are the workers but pawn. We haven't got the nerve to resist. One thing is certain. If unions will not teach class consciousness, and they do not; then the capitalist class will teach it for them.

Igel

(35,309 posts)
39. Some money went all sorts of places.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:00 PM
Dec 2014

Some money never existed. Some money won't exist. And some of the difficulty is that nobody thought long-term and realistic enough.


Where did it go?

A lot of it went to retirees. Some went to the managers where the funds were housed. (They do work; they collect the fees that they're allowed by contract to take. Sometimes they churn funds to increase their fees. Sometimes their fees are too high.)

A lot of it went to the people that the funds bought their investments from. Then when their investments lost value, they lost money.

Some went for "investments" back into the companies, to keep them solvent. At times this was a kind of back-door malfeasance. Sometimes it seemed reasonable, sometimes it didn't. Some investments paid off; some didn't.

Sometimes pensions were leveraged to help workers. Take the U. Calif. pension plan--not one of those considered here, I think, but all large pension plans have similarities. The UC fund managers helped the UC Regents get rid of high-paid faculty and recruit new faculty. On the one hand, they "added years" to tenure so that profs could retire earlier and with higher pensions, letting them cut the overall faculty salary by retiring high-paid senior professors and keeping younger, up-and-coming faculty. On the other hand, they instead of offering a 1-2% higher base pay reduced pension contributions by 1-2%.


A lot of the pension money never really existed.

During the stock market run-ups the funds' assets were huge. And entirely on paper. Sometimes they reduced the amount of pension contributions they collected based on then-current assets. They sometimes increased pensions based on their then-current assets.


A lot of the pension money that was assumed to be in the offing never came to shore.

Pension managers often reduced contributions or increased payouts based on projections. Those had to be "conservative", which at the time meant "based on historical track records." But with a record run-up in the stock market the historical track record predicted exceptional future gains. Only idiots thought that it would continue; there were a lot of idiots. Greed does that to people.

In other words, they over extended their resources based on a convenient fantasy.


Lack of vision.

America underwent a long bout of de-industrialization--something that many college-educated often left-of-center folk gloried in (less pollution, more white-collar "thought worker" jobs, fewer nasty industrial landscapes, more college education needed). The trend to having fewer industrial workers has continued as productivity's increased.

Pension funds are funded by workers and also on a per-worker basis by companies. That meant less income for pension funds as the industrial work-force aged. That continues. So you get fewer worker pension-fund "producers" supporting a larger retiree "pension-consumer" class. It's the same problem that will hit Social Security, but worse.


The problem with this entire discussion, though, isn't just the inherent whole-part fallacy in it, but misdirection of wrath for political points. The CRomnibus allows pension funds to cut pension benefits. Yet we hear people implying, entailing, or stating that the law does the actual cutting. Instead, pressure should be brought to bear on those that would actually do the cutting of pension benefits. For political reasons, though, nobody wants to do that. Better to score political points and be outraged at political foes than deal with the real bogeymen.

Most of the erstwhile pension-cutters are unions. In other words, the entities that want to cut pension benefits and have lobbied both (D) and (R) to be allowed to cut benefits are the unions that those who hate (R) for passing the bill love to love. This is, of course, a huge bit of cognitive dissonance to get past.

newblewtoo

(667 posts)
86. This is one of
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 07:07 PM
Dec 2014

the most understandable explanations of the problem I have seen posted anywhere by anyone. Great job. People may not like what they read but it is the undeniable truth. Bad news does not get better over time and neither will this.

When cuts need to be made they should be made from the top down and no doubt golden parachutes need to be subject to claw backs.

24601

(3,962 posts)
87. Perhaps you can confirm what I believe I heard about this. All the positions aren't what they might
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 08:00 PM
Dec 2014

seem on the surface. For example, someone in Congress may be advocating for a smaller pension - but this doesn't necessarily make them the villain because the redesigned plan would still be larger then what the retiree would get if it was liquidated and taken over by The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. Thanks in advance.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
102. The point is, that the government could or should have been able to see this trend far in advance
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:24 AM
Dec 2014

especially since it was the government that was encouraging the export of our jobs and industry, giving the workers no protection from whip sawing wages to pieces. Where High Profits are God, Taxes are the Devil, and they don't see that the Devil is essential to the belief in God. How can we accept that high profits are good when were are ruined by them? These people on principal sought to internationalize capitalism as never before, and they have only nationalized poverty as never before. And I am not say poverty is worse than before, but only worse exactly when it should be better. Look at how many wars we have fought for capitalism directly and indirectly because of the failures of the world economy. Look at how much sacrifice of life and limb and how much poverty was borne by this people to build up our capital and standard of living. Will these bastards ask us to surrender all hope as the price of calling ourselves Americans. No thanks.

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
77. Private pensions went up in smoke during the merger frenzy in the 80s
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:07 PM
Dec 2014

when the SEC stopped paying much attention to anybody but small stockholders.

More of it evaporated in the late 80s during fake bankruptcies followed by equally fake reorganizations under different names.

Now they're after state and municipal pensions because Wall Street pocketed so much of that money.

The excuse is poor investment strategy. IOW, they were suckers for CDOs in the 00s and pocketed a lot of the money as soon as they had a ready excuse for having it go poof.

Now they're pissing and moaning because we live too long, they don't have enogh money!

Our pensions are salted away in tax havens and are part of what has hyperinflated Wall Street since that's about the only place to have one's money make more money these days.

Bottom line: Shakespeare was wrong. First you start with the bankers. Then get to every other bloodsucker.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
61. That sausage always comes out big and tasty for Jamie dimon, while our part
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 02:42 PM
Dec 2014

is tiny and tastes like shit. And guess which end the ones who made the sausage eat from.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
107. No. This isn't regular legislating. This is theft. This is total bullshit.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 08:43 AM
Dec 2014

It's planned bullshit complete with a government shutdown threat smokescreen.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
38. what YOU said was he lobbied for this. meaning he lobbied for the pension cuts now youre
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:47 PM
Dec 2014

saying he lobbied for the whole thing - what he lobbied for was the bill to keep the government running not for all the little things slipped into it - which is completely different than what you originally said

former9thward

(32,009 posts)
45. He knew exactly what was in it.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:25 PM
Dec 2014

Did you hear him complain about the pension provision? Did he threaten to veto if it was in there? No, because it was placed in there by George Miller (D-CA) who is one of the most liberal members of Congress. Miller is trying to save those pensions from extinction.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
49. yea what i heard him say was 'this is an example of the hard compromise that you get
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:40 PM
Dec 2014

with the divided government you voted for" that doesnt mean he lobbied for pension cuts as was stated by the poster

Sweeney

(505 posts)
46. If you are not willing to see the government shut down
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:30 PM
Dec 2014

to see the workers given justice; what will you do to see the workers given Justice. Our constitution begins with the words: We The People. Is there any reason in the past hundred years that this people wanted to commit national suicide. These dickweeds run down our wages, so we cannot buy anything decent, and as profits -they export our capital, and without capital we do not even have the jobs or the money to support our government or buy imported junk. Why is this so called democracy supporting this class of parasites who hate democracy? They do not love this country and they sure as hell don't love us.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
53. shutting down the government is a big deal dont blame potus for what the left let happen
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:47 PM
Dec 2014

the people who let us down are your fellow lefties who decided that pension cut would be ok by not voting - the democratic voters voted for pension cuts by not voting in the 2014

Sweeney

(505 posts)
57. The man is no original thinker.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:58 PM
Dec 2014

He found the money to keep the banks in business. How about putting we the people before they the bankers for once.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
108. Wait. A majority of Democrats voted for this abortion.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 08:48 AM
Dec 2014

How would a better voter turn out have changed the outcome? Besides, "lefties" did vote. You are just repeating the often repeated lie that liberals stayed home. And voters knew nothing about any pension cut.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
48. NO. I said he lobbied for the budget. Which he did.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:39 PM
Dec 2014

Including the pension cuts, the rollback of bank oversight, pell grant cuts, EPA cuts, and the rest. this is now our budget, to which our (D) president committed us.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
52. "NO. I said he lobbied for the budget." yes he wanted a budget that doesnt mean he wanted
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:44 PM
Dec 2014

pension cuts - but that is the hard compromise you get from the divided government the american people voted for

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
90. Obama, Biden, etc all lobbied on this during the recess
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 09:58 PM
Dec 2014

http://blogs.rollcall.com/218/cromnibus-house-democrats-spli/?dcz=

Pelosi delivered a stunning floor speech earlier Thursday where she said she was “enormously disappointed” the White House had called for Democrats to support the bill. She said members were being “blackmailed” by Republicans into supporting the legislation.

Shortly after Pelosi’s speech, with support for the bill in question, the House went into recess, delaying the vote on the cromnibus that was slated for roughly 2 p.m.

The postponed vote gave Obama and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. the opportunity to call House Democrats and give them the pitch as to why they should vote for the cromnibus.

Sources said that Hoyer was calling members to suggest they take a deal now, rather than wait for one that could be significantly worse later, though the Maryland Democrat’s staff pushed back against the characterization that Hoyer was whipping for the trillion-dollar measure.

Much more at link. As Doctor_J said, there are many links to this.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
44. All the unions worked for an end to Communism
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:22 PM
Dec 2014

And we all worked to see the end of Communists in the Unions. I had to swear on the way into my union that I had never been a Communist or a member of any organization dedicated to the violent overthrow of our government. That was easy. I have always been a socialist, and we never advocated violence of any sort.

What these people did not realize was that only the threat of Communism made the trade unions acceptable to the rich, and that took the wind out of the Communist boogie man. But to see Communism die as a threat, and then we seem like we are the threat, and we seem like we are in left field. And now the whole process has to begin again except now all of our resources have been shot, and our hard earned capital has been exported and will never be returned. We are not fighting the same battle that was fought in the early part of the last century.

We are fighting the Civil War: Will we be reduced to slavery in competition with slaves? Even if you could control the government the government still gives such protection to property that short of revolution there is no defense against the rich.

Consider: Trade unions were only doing the job set out in the constitution as the job of government. Justice for this people is the task of the government, and while they have a monopoly on the power to give us justice, they use their power for ends that it was not created for. Every effective method unions have found to bring justice to their workers has been disallowed by the Supreme Court. Their defense of property rights is complete; and no number of organized workers can stop this government from doing what it was not created to do, nor make it do what it was created to do. It needs to die.

wolfie001

(2,240 posts)
89. Yes, the new term is Wage Slavery...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 09:25 PM
Dec 2014

....$9.00/hr part-time, can't afford a room in a house or clothes of your back, food on the table. Welcome back, Antebellum USA. Walmart and their business model really wrecked this country.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
98. If we do not have enough democracy to keep our commonwealth in the country
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:07 AM
Dec 2014

Then we are in the same position as Roman farmers displaced from their fields by slaves. The working people saw that before the civil war, that slavery devalued free labor, and they wanted free soil for free people. It was not altogether altruistic. We are stuck competing with slaves we might well have freed, and are being made slaves in the process. We cannot protect the companies we have worked with and worked for from relocating in some southern state with zero labor protection, and they cannot stop those same businesses from relocating in another country where child labor and other servitude is allowed. The countries do not mind who dies in the process of their capitalization. They can be brought up to speed in the world in short order, but we can be reduced by the same margin. And eventually we face depression when we cannot even afford to buy what is produced here no matter how badly we need it.

On the bright side: Government bankruptcy always leads to revolution, and this breaking of our pensions to save the government will not save the government for long. Up the revolution.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
47. Even mice gotta eat
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:33 PM
Dec 2014

And they could carry the whole country if they were going in the same direction. This people is going down the rat hole. Do you suppose we will discover a common mind there; or only watch the whole of society fall on top of us.

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
8. Who was regulating/monitoring these plans?
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 10:55 AM
Dec 2014

It's understandable that many involved inside the plans want to believe long term stock gains will be higher and life expectancy will be lower. But you need someone to oversee these who will force more conservative estimates of long term gains and life expectancy.

Unfortunately the horse appears to have left the barn many years ago. IIRC the pension guaranty trust, which takes over if the firm fails, will only pay about 50%.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
51. Capitalism is anarchy
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:42 PM
Dec 2014

And worse than anarchy it is guided by unproved principals like higher profits being good for the whole society and people. It is the people denied their wages and jobs in the name of higher profit who can no longer support the structures of government. It is those with profits in hand who cannot be taxed or will not be taxed on principal who should support government because government defends their privileges so they might do so. If the rich will not defend their government that will support their privilege, and will not support our right, then why do we support that government, and why do we think we need that government?.

HoosierCowboy

(561 posts)
10. Is this the needed....
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:01 AM
Dec 2014

...kick in the behind that everyone needs to get involved? People might have different opinions on different issues, but this one is a barn burner.
Everybody gets old. Even the law enforcement that will be protecting the institutions that will be robbing us of our pensions.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
12. This is theft
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:07 AM
Dec 2014

Last edited Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:05 PM - Edit history (2)

you have governors forgoing pension contributions to balance budgets in to support tax cuts and corporate subsidies thus helping to create the so called insolvencies in the first place.

Now they want the people who are contractually owed these monies as deferred compensation to pay for this crap.

It is plain and simply a money grab to further enrich the wealthy.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
28. That's one reason why I support the post office
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:18 PM
Dec 2014

having to put funds in every year. Their retires may be the only safe ones. Many here think it is crazy.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
33. the p.o. pension is so well funded that it has the pensions for people who dont work there yet
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:40 PM
Dec 2014

you realize that pension funding level is a republican design to destory the p.o. and give that pension money to the 1%

Sweeney

(505 posts)
56. absolutely correct.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:55 PM
Dec 2014

This is an effort to destroy a government monopoly which actually functions very well because private delivery servers want that business. By law, the government has the right to demand all of that private business, and should. The privates give the dirty end to the post office anyway. If it is out of the way they simply hand it to the post office and say: you get it. What horse shit.

The postal system is the model our health care administration should follow. No! We must have profits and profiteers feeding off our need for life.

madville

(7,410 posts)
64. Co-sponsored by Ted Kennedy and Henry Waxman
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 02:58 PM
Dec 2014

Democrats share equal blame with USPS pension bill, a majority of them supported it and some prominent Democratic names like those in the title helped write it.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
83. Those retirees haven't drawn their payments yet. I'm sure Congress critters are
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:49 PM
Dec 2014

slobbering at the corners of their mouths over that pile of money the post office has set aside. Close down the post office and voila! Rule changes.

It used to be a contract was a contract. Not anymore.

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
14. You don't have a choice, they are coming for your pensions and when you get ill...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:09 AM
Dec 2014

the insurance companies arent going pay for treatments.

Welcome to America 2.0

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
15. My Carpenters Union pernsion (disability)
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:10 AM
Dec 2014

is being stopped. My investments, through our voluntary program, were wiped out around 2007. I had planned on having a constant return after retirement. It (lost all value) happened and I grudgingly accepted it.
However my pension, which I paid for weekly and was as I was informed, was an insurance program for my retirement or disability, was, I thought, sacrosanct. I paid for it, it was insurance for the future, my pension.
Well, I did receive a letter but no pension check; already. This week.
I have my SS disability (which the SS dept. drug out for years before finally approving it, thus lowering my monthly amount. Thankfully, I at least had my Union disability pension (more than final SS payments) to survive on.
Now my future is so uncertain. I will fight this, but since Congress has legalized this theft, I do not expect to win. My lifestyle will
change dramatically. My income cut by 55-60%.
I do not blame my Union. It has been steadily declining for years. The money that I received was through our insurance fund.
It is beyond devastating that these wealthy insurers will now be able to bankrupt me so that they can continue being wealthy and ignore the the contract and the years of money that I paid for my "guaranteed" pension should I become unable to work before retirement age.

shrike

(3,817 posts)
29. I'm in a union household, and I'm so very sorry this happened to you.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:19 PM
Dec 2014

I don't know where you are, but a carpenter's union local in our area fleeced its members by investing in a local project that went bust; bribes were taken, real mess. Our union has been tremendous in looking out for us; I only hope they continue. Again, I'm so very sorry.

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
176. The Union changed my life for the better.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 07:54 PM
Dec 2014

No matter what, I believe that everyone should have the well informed opportunity to belong to one. Just like every Democratic institution, it is only as good as it's participating members. I graduated college because I wanted knowledge but I enjoyed building things. I started framing homes at 15 y.o., I was raised in the South where Unions were and still are vilified. I moved North and kept doing residential construction (low wages) for a year. I started working on a bridge crew for a substantial raise in pay. A friend left the company and joined the Union. He called and told me about the benefits of belonging to a Union. Joining was the best career move I ever made.
For the time being, my Union President has made sure that I will receive my disability pension. These pension changes were enacted by "our" corporate owned congress. I understand the politics and in better health I was involved in them. If I do lose my pension, I will feel more screwed by politicians than anyone.
I saw that Unions were recruiting heavily from the immigrants that Obama recently sanctioned. That is great because most Americans are clueless about what they can achieve through collective bargaining. It is Democracy in a pure form, shaped by its participating members.
I hope that I am able to keep my disability pension. It will financially ruin me if I don't. I am still a proud, dues paying member of the
UBC and I hope to live to see it restored to it's glory days.
This recent congressional legislation to allow Unions to keep their pensions alive by denying a generation their paid for and earned pensions is a sick piece of corporate legislation. Now TPTB have a great visual to use against our Unions. All the while, they are the ones responsible for destroying our economy, Of course they were bailed out... BTW, their workers were screwed horribly also.

turbinetree

(24,701 posts)
17. Promises
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:23 AM
Dec 2014

Last edited Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:01 PM - Edit history (1)

This is what happens when people that vote against there best interests get a party in power (REPUBLICANS and DINO'S) that are beholden to the outright corruption from Wall Street and the corporation from the firms filing a secret deal rider(s) into a must pass spending bill to screw the retirees.
Then when these hedge funds and others like the automobile, airlines, mines, file a 10K prospectus, they tell all of the retirees that the pension fund "was fully funded" knowing that it was a lie.
They were taking the pension fund and using it for a operating slush fund, and then when they file for Bankruptcy, they shift the cost to the PBGC.
They then tell the PBGC, they will help fund the program and then turn right around and have this government agency falling further and further behind (42 Billion) in the lack of funding from the non bankrupt and the bankrupted firms.
This is outrageous every congressman and women and senators that voted with and for this last crime laden omnibus spending bill should be sued and thrown out of office.
This is the first salvo, just think what's in store for SOCIAL SECIRITY, so for all of you that did not vote in this last election you are not entitled to whine, and for all you that voted against your own self interest have kept a republican in office you have no business to whine.


 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
23. “White people still ask me why Mookie threw the can through the window,”
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:01 PM
Dec 2014

...
Lee said in an interview. “Twenty years later, they’re still asking me that.”
“No black person ever, in 20 years, no person of color has ever asked me why.”
...


I don't think the whining is coming from them. It appears to be from someplace higher...


here.
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
21. And no stirring speech was made on the Senate floor about pensions....Senators don't need the
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:54 AM
Dec 2014

pensions and most of them will get more than one anyway, so they are concerned with protection of investment vehicles at the banks which serve their 1% interests. Pensions for people are not worth a mention.

turbinetree

(24,701 posts)
30. Corruption
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:30 PM
Dec 2014

There have been quite a few congressmen and women and senators that have been preaching to the choir to what the corruption is playing out before I eyes, whenever they get the chance.

They and a lot of us have been warning that these last minute budget deals are what is taking this country down the path to fourth state status ranking and the gerrymandering and the out right corruption on the floor of the house is unbelievable, prime example (Boehner giving out bribe checks from the tobacco industry to get a vote). Most people would have gone to jail on the bribe charges if this was taped but not these hypocrites getting the checks, but he keeps getting re-elected by the greedy and political corruption in the state of Ohio.



WE must also remember that we have a failed media for not reporting this pension and other issues on the floor, like the Postal System being privatized for out right greed, no explanation of history of what is happening and how it happened under the Delay / Hassert corrupt Congress , but just that its not working and that all the postal system does to make money is junk mail, that is a lie.


We get sound bites of more sensational journalism to the beholden commercial interests, we get news that its is going to cost 30 million to sponsor a bowl game name. We get news that a pro football coach is thinking of going to Michigan and that completely failed state and give him 8 million a year. Were they have a de-facto dictator governor attacking the public pension funds and then using tax payer money to build another football and hockey stadium, and those twits in Michigan keep voting against there own self interests, but blaming others.



There is a connection, and if and when the voter finally realizes that what is happening and its is happening to them they start to sing a different tune, but by then its to late.


The dumbing down began in Kanawha West Virginia, when this group attacked public education and books, then we see the transformation of the Republican party being bought and sold by ALEC in the 1970's continuing today and a supposed news organization spewing tin foil gibber jabber of hate and fear.



I am going to bet one dollar that before the end of the year transpires and another budget bill comes up late next year and its is a must pass bill, SOCIAL SECURITY will be on the proverbial front line that's how confident I am that a REPUBLICAN and a DINO are going to sell and privatize this program, because they will say the fund is running out, no its not , its having issues because someone making over 117,000 dollars and one cent does not have to pay anymore into the system based on there earned income.

brewens

(13,588 posts)
34. I wondered when the other shoe would drop. People that weren't worried about us current
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:41 PM
Dec 2014

workers being screwed because they got out and had their pensions. I know a guy that works for the state here in Idaho that's thinking the same way. He's bailing out early, planning on locking in his pension and benefits. I know what his attitude will be, I got mine and it's too bad but we just can't afford paying for everyone else.

I've wondered why republicans haven't tried to shut down the Pension Benefit Guaruntee Corporation? It's not government funded but there must be some cost to taxpayers to administer it. I can see bagger types going along with shutting that down. If they aren't getting a pension, why should they pay to help anyone else get theirs? Never mind that a lot of right-wingers are still collecting some pension benefits only because of the PBGC. That's one of the things that have allowed crooks like Romney to operate. Even after he and his gang "busted out" some company, at least retirees still got most of their pensions in at least some cases.

JohnnyRingo

(18,633 posts)
35. Also known as the Kline - Miller Ammendment
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 12:41 PM
Dec 2014

One is the republican congressman who won Bill Maher's "flip a district" contest and went on to re-election, and the other is widely regarded as the House's most liberal democratic member slated for retirement himself.

I know this because I already did much research the day the Cromnibus was passed. I'm one of those "certain workers" who face an uncertain future with a pension cut. I retired in 2003, and don't know what to do or who to blame. So far I've been broad brushing republicans as trying to take my monthly GM/Delphi pension away, but this 11th hour bipartisan amendment has me at a loss for words. Civil ones anyway.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kline_(politician)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Miller_(California_politician)

"That awful Kline Miller Amendment" from the LA Times:

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-that-awful-congressional-plan-20141209-column.html

on point

(2,506 posts)
40. Obviously these companies are not as profitable as the seem, nor govts able to cut taxes as much
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:02 PM
Dec 2014

Instead cut the profits, and restore the tax rates. The pensions were promised years ago and years ago the pukes and the banks started saying we don't need to fund them fully (e.g. we want to rob the pension funds). No givebacks here. Force the companies and govts to pay.

RobinA

(9,893 posts)
42. Eventually
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:06 PM
Dec 2014

it will have to occur to someone that once the pension-financed retirees get through the system leaving only the huge pool of retirees with no pensions who are in their wake, there are entire industries that will suffer or collapse.

They keep building over 60 housing around my area and I keep wondering who they expect to live there once retirees don't have pensions. Despite what they like you to believe, unless you are quite wealthy, you can't "save" your way to a secure retirement unless you plan to die at 70. I look at the prices of even moderate retirement communities, and you have to have money coming in to live there any length of time.

Things could get ugly.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
54. Your government is concerned with its own survival.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 01:50 PM
Dec 2014

It is reaching the end of its own financial rope, which is an end Marxists saw coming a long time ago. There are contradiction in capitalism that must be played out. Export of capital and import of poverty has only hastened the fall. Now it will not defend to right of workers to money that they set themselves up to guarantee. Is this wise when more and more people are showing less and less faith in government? The government is like the only whore in town. What is any one going to do no matter how bad it gets?

aggiesal

(8,914 posts)
60. As I understand it ...
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 02:35 PM
Dec 2014

European corporations that offer pension plans to their employees,
by law, have to put all pension monies into an account that the
corporations have no further access to.

In this country no such law exists and corporations buy each
other out so an underfunded pension can raid an overfunded
pension plan.

Now corporations don't even offer pension plans to their new
employees and most don't bother to deposit their portion of
the obligation.

It's cheaper to buy a politician and have a law written to
obsolve themselves from ever having to pay it.

America, what a wonderful country!

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
63. completely corrupt at this point.
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 02:45 PM
Dec 2014

It no longer has even a vestige of its stated purpose. Except to preserve the second amendment

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
66. The comments are really telling on that article
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 03:17 PM
Dec 2014

They mostly blame unions and the workers for this and say nobody should expect to have a defined pension.

Yet, this was the norm for years, and companies are making more money than ever before, so it's a shift of mindset rather than that
companies couldn't afford it.

Also a total lack of understanding as far as the part Wall Street played in the underfunding.
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
78. If nobody should expect to have a defined pension, then nobody should trust
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:13 PM
Dec 2014

corporations to honor their word, ever. It was quite simply, a promise between two parties who were supposed to enter negotiations in good faith. One party promised a defined pension in exchange for a promise from the other side to work hard and loyally.

But of course, logic is not something Americans are good at, so most will simply parrot right-wing talking points they get on cable news, logic be damned.

wolfie001

(2,240 posts)
88. Some of the commentators are clueless in that.....
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 09:17 PM
Dec 2014

Wall Street has its eyes on Social Security as well. The haircut is coming and then everyone will be in penury. Democrats used to fight these battles to keep the money in the hands of the lower and middle classes. Now, the white flag is run up before Sen. Warren has a chance to speak. Disgusting.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
80. It is hard for me to understand the idea that
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:36 PM
Dec 2014

there is no money to rebuild the pension funds when you see the inequity of wealth distribution in this country.
The wealthiest would not suffer if they were forced to pay more in taxes yet the retirees should have their incomes taken away?
Also we heard that corporations were sitting on a mountain if cash a few years ago.
I think that the story behind this law is bogus. Just as the story of the Post Office going bankrupt is bogus.
The fix is not reduced benefits but a tax policy that redistributes wealth back to us who had it taken away.
The big picture is one where we accept excuses to give even more of our wealth to the 1%.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
180. of course it's bogus. the last 40 years have been bogus and the next 40 years will be too unless
Mon Dec 29, 2014, 01:34 AM
Dec 2014

working people get together to stop the train.

the bogosity is demonstrated by how easily the ptb created the 'money' to bail out the bankers etc while prescribing austerity for workers.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
103. I tried in the most kind way possible for thirty years to tell people the folly
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:43 AM
Dec 2014

of believing in capitalism. What ever happens to me; I can never say I didn't see it coming. What I could not teach, the government/economy will teach; but how much good will it do. If any of my age group picks up a gun they will fire it at their own stupid head rather than seeking out the nearest rich man to off. You look. All these proud working men with spit to show for it. They are not the equal of the blacks they so long abused. The blacks at least will fight back.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
105. Just wondering
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 08:02 AM
Dec 2014

how do you fit "the blacks they so long abused" into this? Were they slaveowners? All KKK? Could it be there are some black union members affected by these cuts too? What am I missing here? Should I just get some coffee and rethink? It may be too early in the morning for me to post.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
116. It took a long time to get blacks in the Union
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 12:03 AM
Dec 2014

There was one in my fathers generation, and no one would admit they were working with a black man. They all said he was a black foot Indian. Well sure; his feet are black, but so is the rest of them. Some white Ironworkers would not work with blacks at first. I followed my father into the trade, and I can remember hearing a phone call from a business agent. He needed a man, and called the hall, and the BA said: I got a man for you, Sweeney.
Well send him out, said Sweeney
There is just one little problem with that, said the BA
So what's the problem, asked Sweeney
He's black, said the BA.
And Sweeney said: I don't care; send him out.
My old man was a cracker jack. Got on the discovery channel documentary on building the Bridge (Mackinaw Bridge). He broke in a lot of men and was a good foreman and teacher. A master of a man. All I was ever was a hand, way above average. He just wasn't prejudiced like some, probably from the Navy

But you know, I once got a press pass to a George Wallace campaign speech. Got front row. And the guy did give a good old style political speech and never once used the Nword. Between Olds and Fisher body employee, many still in their shop clothes the old civic Center was filled. Granpa Jones of the old Hee Haw show was there and played. And I think his choice for V-P, an Air Force general was talking about nuking North Vietnam. Any way, I digress. Yes; even while at the end of the civil war there were more black building tradesmen than white, after a lot of effort the Irish, primarily beat them out of the work, and it took a long time to get them back in and under the threat of law. And now we are wondering again what hit us.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
125. Today blacks are more likely to belong to unions than whites.
Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:45 AM
Dec 2014

--Men had a higher union membership rate (11.9 percent) than women (10.5
percent). (See table 1.)

--Black workers were more likely to be union members than white, Asian, or
Hispanic workers. (See table 1.)

--Among states, New York continued to have the highest union membership rate
(24.4 percent), and North Carolina had the lowest rate (3.0 percent). (See
table 5.)

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm

Omaha Steve

(99,635 posts)
115. Here is some more on this: AFL-CIO on Retirement Security
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:28 PM
Dec 2014

http://www.aflcio.org/Issues/Retirement-Security

Fewer employers today provide defined-benefit pensions for their workers—and among those that do, many are offering “defined-contribution” (like 401[k]s) rather than traditional “defined-benefit” pension plans.

That’s why Social Security insurance is essential for millions of retirees. Nearly two-thirds of retirees count on Social Security for half or more of their retirement income and for more than three in 10, Social Security is 90 percent or more of their income. It is a safety net that keeps retirees out of poverty.

It’s also important to figure out what you will need to retire. Talking a look at how much Social Security will provide, whether you have another form of pension and how much you spend are all components in determining when you can retire.

For decades, workers achieved retirement security because their retirement income flowed from a combination of employer-provided pensions, Social Security and personal savings. But the recession has exposed the severe deficiencies in our retirement system. We need to develop a new way to provide workers with lifetime retirement security beyond Social Security.







Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Union retirees: Don't cut...