Chokehold Case Stirs Debate on Special Prosecutors
Source: AP
After a police officer wasn't indicted in a fatal chokehold caught on video, some officials are reviving calls to entrust such cases to special prosecutors, rather than local district attorneys.
The city's elected public advocate and some state lawmakers are pressing for appointing special state prosecutors for police killings, saying Eric Garner's death has bared problems with having DAs lead investigations and prosecutions of the police who help them build cases. Similar legislation has been proposed in Missouri since the police shooting of an unarmed teenager in Ferguson.
"This is a watershed moment," New York Public Advocate Letitia James said by phone. "It's clear that the system is broken and an independent prosecutor is needed."
She's advocating appointing such prosecutors whenever police kill or seriously injure someone. Assemblymen Karim Camara and Marcos Crespo are proposing special prosecutors for police killings of unarmed people.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said last week on CNN's "The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer" that the state should examine whether DAs should bring such cases and "potential roles for special prosecutors," as part of a broad look at the criminal justice system.
.............................
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/chokehold-case-stirs-debate-special-prosecutors-27436701
House of Roberts
(5,174 posts)When cops are the suspects, they have a conflict-of-interest that is incestuous with the local police. Their conviction rate is dependent on the PD to help them make cases, and thus, get re-elected. They can't be involved.
DLnyc
(2,479 posts)Exactly. Cases which may involve police misconduct should never go to the local DA. Thank you!
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)This is not a police union head, a retired cop or a fellow cop, this is the man who is tasked with investigating and prosecuting use for force cases in his county.
So much for a unbiased and fair investigation.
In the comment section of the same video there is a comment from a person going by the name Ernie Baker, claiming to be a member of the San Bernardino District Attorney's Bureau of Investigation.
These are the folks tasked with investigating use of force cases.
They are so blatant.
And this is the case he's referring to.
Dad Dies After Deputies Hit Him With Taser
The Victorville Daily Press reports that Dante Parker, 36, was suspected of attempting to burglarize a Victorville home on Tuesday afternoon.
The person who reported the burglary said the suspect fled on a bicycle and, according to the San Bernardino County Sheriff's office, Parker was seen riding his bike near the scene.
But a former co-worker of Parker's, who worked as a pressman for the Victoria Daily Press, tells the paper his fellow employee wouldn't steal from anybody.
"That whole story is totally wrong; thats just not Dante, Richard Loredo, a former Daily Press pressman who worked with Parker, said Wednesday. Dantes not a burglar ... You can see how well his kids were raised; he was a good dad. For the police department to portray him like that is ... unfair.
NBC Los Angeles reports that, according to authorities, Parker resisted arrest and became "uncooperative and combative," according to police.
It was at that point that the female officer trying to apprehend Parker shocked him with a Taser "multiple times," according to a release obtained by the station.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/14/dad-killed-taser_n_5679152.html
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)In other words, declarations of laws and rights are actually an acknowledgment of the failures of the social design. There is no such thing as 'rights' - as the reference can be altered at will. The fourth amendment is an attempt to protect against state power abuse, that is clear. But it avoids the real issue, and that is: Why would the state have an interest to search and seize to begin with? How do you remove the mechanisms that generate such behavior? We need to focus on the real cause.
We have to understand that government as we know it today, is not in place for the well being of the public, but rather for the perpetuation of their establishment and their power. Just like every other institution within a monetary system. Government is a monetary invention for the sake of economic and social control and its methods are based upon self-preservation, first and foremost. All a government can really do is to create laws to compensate for an inherent lack of integrity within the social order.
In society today the public is essentially kept distracted and uninformed. This is the way that governments maintain control. If you review history, power is maintained through ignorance.
~Peter Joseph
daleanime
(17,796 posts)how small of a solution will be used to fix a fairly part problem.