Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:58 PM Nov 2014

Pentagon to send more troops to Afghanistan as NATO comes up short

Source: Washington Times (sorry)

The Obama administration is preparing to add as many as 1,000 troops to the U.S. ground forces that will remain in Afghanistan next year in order to fill a gap left by NATO partners, according to a media report Tuesday.

Three sources with direct knowledge of the situation told Reuters that final U.S. troop numbers are still being discussed. But one of the sources said that at least several hundred American soldiers will be on the ground than initially planned.

“If they hadn’t done that, the NATO mission would have lost bases,” the source said.

Reuters reported that under the U.S. commitment, described as a “bridging solution” until other nations fulfill their pledges later in the year or the troops are no longer needed, Washington may provide up to 1,000 extra troops.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/25/pentagon-to-send-more-troops-to-afghanistan-as-nat/

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon to send more troops to Afghanistan as NATO comes up short (Original Post) Recursion Nov 2014 OP
Evidently, I guess we can forget about Poland . . . Journeyman Nov 2014 #1
Bwah Recursion Nov 2014 #2
They will stay in Poland too jakeXT Nov 2014 #12
Don't throw good money after bad. Shemp Howard Nov 2014 #3
Grant said it best: "I reinforce success" (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #6
Which "success" are we reinforcing? There have been so many. n/t jtuck004 Nov 2014 #9
The "Pentagon" doesn't send troops anywhere! George II Nov 2014 #4
I am having serious trouble with this. oldandhappy Nov 2014 #5
We got the check, thanks. DocMac Nov 2014 #7
Last I heard Afghanistan isn't a country with a coastline on the Atlantic ocean. It is not located Monk06 Nov 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Monk06 Nov 2014 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Monk06 Nov 2014 #11
In the words of the late Edward M. Kennedy ... CountAllVotes Nov 2014 #13
And the second Vietnam contnues sakabatou Nov 2014 #14
Endless War EEO Nov 2014 #15
why has NATO come up short heaven05 Nov 2014 #16

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
3. Don't throw good money after bad.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:07 AM
Nov 2014

NATO is "coming up short" for a reason. It's the same reason our allies pulled out of Vietnam. Our allies understand, but we evidently do not. Don't throw good money after bad.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
5. I am having serious trouble with this.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:45 AM
Nov 2014

I try to be supportive -- but, gag. Stop sending troops. Does not work!!

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
8. Last I heard Afghanistan isn't a country with a coastline on the Atlantic ocean. It is not located
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 01:20 AM
Nov 2014

in Europe. Only when the Russians invaded was it even remotely considered a Cold War strategic partner. NATO has no business in countries which are not original signatories to the NATO treaty with is a post war alliance against the no longer existing Soviet Union.

Dissolve NATO and get the US out of Europe.

Response to Recursion (Original post)

Response to Recursion (Original post)

CountAllVotes

(20,875 posts)
13. In the words of the late Edward M. Kennedy ...
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 04:50 AM
Nov 2014

Afghanistan will become President Obama's Vietnam.

And so it is ...



 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
16. why has NATO come up short
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 09:37 AM
Nov 2014

that begs an analysis. Oh never mind, those NATO countries are not going to support american imperialist empire anymore, I guess. Those goddamn PNAC war monger/empire striving jerks knew just what kind of mess they were creating for the next generation of american political leaders and assured our continuing loss of respect in the eyes of the world population and, in their PNAC arrogance, they DID NOT CARE.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pentagon to send more tro...