Facebook Will Sell Users' Data to Serve Ads on Sites Across the Web
Source: NBC News
Facebook is now selling marketers ads that will appear all over the web, not just on the social network, the company announced Sunday. It will offer advertisers Facebook data to help them target customers, and also track whether the ads lead to sales.
It's Facebook's push to become a web-wide ad platform like Google, and the company is doing so through a relaunch of the "Atlas" network that Facebook bought from Microsoft for an undisclosed sum in February 2013. The new methods are designed to address the fact that desktop ad-tracking "cookies" don't offer demographic information like age or gender, don't work on mobile and can't follow users across web browsers or devices, Erik Johnson, the head of Atlas, said in a blog post. Atlas, he wrote, is dedicated to "targeting, serving and measuring across devices" -- with the data users share on Facebook served up as the icing on the cake.
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/facebook-will-sell-users-data-serve-ads-sites-across-web-n214026
As predictable as Microsoft updates, Facebook's peeling back of its users' privacy.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Here's hoping most people's behavior is like mine: never ever clicking on an ad intentionally.
And not entering personal data, and when I have to: LIE.
And now, no Facebook on anything but my computer. Getting v close to No Facebook At All.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)loudsue
(14,087 posts)I still use google, , but facebook I can totally do without.
Ampersand Unicode
(503 posts)I use it and a bunch of other useful tools on my computer to block those nefarious social media websites. On Firefox I use Adblock Plus as well as the Disconnect suite of add-ons. I also use the pseudo-firewall apps PeerBlock and DNSKong, which allow blocking by (respectively) IP range and keywords. With DNSKong I use a text filter that includes the words "facebook," "twitter," "google," "pinterest," and "yahoo" among others. With PeerBlock I use custom IP lists with ranges for particular social media sites; there are premade ones available at iblocklist.com. When I have some disposable income available, I'm going to sign up for a non-US VPN from this list:
https://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/
I use IxQuick.com for search and don't have a "real" email account. When I need to sign up for things I get a disposable one from YopMail.com. I haven't used Google in years.
It's not perfect (nothing is, save for going completely off the grid and living underground in a bunker), but at least it hardens it quite a bit. No access requests incoming or outgoing involving Facebook, Twitter or even Google.
And of course, there's the necessary behavioral adaptations one needs to stay successfully hidden and undiscoverable online. Resisting the "FOMO" impulse is one; another is not giving a damn if you're "cool" or "up with the trends" or not. Personally, I manage all of the quite easily by avoiding relationships with people and also not having a phone number... but YMMV.
BumRushDaShow
(129,096 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)That's messed up.
alp227
(32,034 posts)Besides, how much would you pay for an ad-free social media experience? Maintaining websites - even DU - costs money. Somebody's gotta pay whether advertisers or users.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)and was secure (as possible) from other means of exploitation, I'd pay 10 bucks a month for such a site, if I was into that sort of thing.
C Moon
(12,213 posts)I asked to be invited, but haven't heard back.
They probably want a donation..."Hint, hint."
zonkers
(5,865 posts)People are dizzy. I am going back to yellow pads, number 2 pencils and soap erasers.
C Moon
(12,213 posts)People are selling invites.
tridim
(45,358 posts)C Moon
(12,213 posts)New Social Network Ello Accepts Funding from Venture Capital Firm
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/New-Social-Network-Ello-Accepts-Funding-from-Venture-Capital-Firm-20140927-0031.html
arcane1
(38,613 posts)C Moon
(12,213 posts)but they shouldn't claim to be something they aren't planning on being.
If that makes sense. :/
Orrex
(63,216 posts)zonkers
(5,865 posts)I don't know who on DU said the last quote but it is my mantra.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)that mentions "the cloud". It doesn't sink in that they are giving all their private/business data to someone else unless it's phrased like that.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)"Your social network is owned by advertisers," it reads. "Every post you share, every friend you make and every link you follow is tracked, recorded and converted into data. Advertisers buy your data so they can show you more ads. You are the product that's bought and sold."
Users who click "I Disagree" are re-directed to Facebook.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/inside-ello-invitation-social-network-bills-anti-facebook/story?id=25834013
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)They are asshats. It's only good for a business profile not individuals. Total Scam.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)Do.Not.Click.On.Any.Link - not even a news story - go to the site itself. When I go to news sites there is a big message begging me to turn off Adblock Plus so "I can get the full enhancement of the site" or "advertisers are interested in what I think". Pshaw....
SeattleVet
(5,477 posts)I started using the Internet when it was still an ad-free community. Once ads started appearing I basically 'trained' myself to not see them. I could read through a lot of stuff and never have the ads on the page register. More than once I've had someone ask about something on a page I was reading, and I'd ask what they were talking about. They'd point out some content in an ad, and I've have to tell then that I never really 'saw' it until they pointed it out to me.
Between AdBlockPlus and SocialFixer, new sites and Facebook are pretty ad-free for me. Like you, I don't believe I have ever knowingly clicked on any ad that I was served. I also select the link information and past it in to go directly to the real place instead of raising 'click counts' for everyone that's framing the links on their own sites.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)that forums which use the FB engine for their comments (like Huff), don't display any comments unless I have an active FB login. Does that mean that FB even tracks the comment threads I might look at?
In any case, I guess I just gave up looking at comments.
Ampersand Unicode
(503 posts)H.P. Puffnstuff started getting really crappy once they started requiring users to sign up for Facebook in order to "verify" their native accounts. Eventually they phased out the native system altogether and switched their commenting section 100% over to FB. I deleted my account there once it became apparent that you would have to have a Facebook in order to participate in discussions. I refused. Also, it wasn't even enough to just have a Facebook. You had to "verify" your account in order to login at HP. That meant giving FB your mobile phone number. Call me a real Amish Luddite and a recluse, but I don't have a mobile phone. Needless to say, I don't have a "verified" Facebook either. Or any Facebook. As I wrote above, I block it entirely on my computer.
Huffingpaint is little more than an echo-chamber sounding board for its celebrity-blogger clientele. The usual big-name A-list elite who have something to say about some issue that they sort of care about but really seem to only want to be promoting themselves. I got tired of real news being shoved aside so that Alec Baldwin can complain about the paparazzi, Dan Blather can crush on Derek Jeter, and John Cusack can spend three whole days and about 5,000 words too much shilling a lame book from his shrink.
If I want celebrities' "opinions," I'll waste time at Goop.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)The point was that if those sites that use FB as their engine require an active login, they can track your clicks on the comments by linking into FB as you read them. That means that it is possible to profile your interests.
It's analogous to having a GPS in your pocket that tracks where you stop as you travel around the city. BTW, that's why I refuse to agree to the terms of service in some of the mapping apps in my smart phone. As well as the use of the qr decoder -- like I'm going to agree that their host can follow my interests.
Information is money.
Paraphrasing a point I saw in other circles, you would be screaming to high heaven if the nsa suggested it but happily hand over the info to FB.
BTW, I noticed the comments reappeared yesterday. I guess theuy got a lot of complaints from people who want to read the comments but don't want to use FB.
I don't think you're doing Huff justice. That one is analogous to refusing to use the library cause it has a copy of 50 shades. Stay in the middle of the page and be discriminating and there's useful stuff.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)'net, anything that would track where we were going. I don't link my number on any site, but I do purchase over the 'net so I can be found that way (sorta, some places still have us living out of state, which is okay), but advertisers would be scratching their heads at my purchases. Don't have kids or grandkids, but we'll stream a kids movie now and then. There are some items I needed for crafts and it came from wedding sections (way cheaper) but no one I know is getting married and how do you advertise to a Pagan anyway? I have all the books I can possible use and I leave the state to get my candles in person. We have all the toys we could use and don't even have an eye pod - may break down and get one this year. Who knows?
Mix it up, don't let them get a handle on who you are. We are complicated humans who can't be pegged by an algorithm as much as their desires say we can.
Back to the thread - I don't answer anything that has you comment via FB. Most the time I am not even logged into FB. Almost all big sites are like that now. I read it was because of anonymous nasty comments but I think too that it is to capture your comments and where you comment.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)And don't need it.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)And then they are paranoid about the government knowing anything about them.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Or perhaps it's all working subliminally... Dunno. I recently bought an Android phone I never saw advertised. What did I do? I checked the specs, went into the store, tried the phones in my hands etc etc. I bought the one that made the most sense, given my needs.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)I realized that a few years ago and closed my account shortly afterwards
drm604
(16,230 posts)marble falls
(57,106 posts)I get a lot less ads on sites though some (very few) block content because "do not track me" blocks cookies very well.
Ampersand Unicode
(503 posts)https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-plus-pop-up-addon/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/disconnect/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fbdc/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/gdc/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/twdc/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/yesscript/
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
http://peerblock.com/
http://pyrenean.com/Filtering - DNSKong and eDexter (keyword-based blocking software)
Hosts files:
How to Use
Hosts Expert (formerly Hoster): GUI-based Hosts File Editor
Someone Who Cares: Hosts File
Spybot Search & Destroy (installs updated hosts file)
VPN services: TorrentFreak review of the most privacy-conscious VPN services
I use all these except VPN which I can't afford yet. Haven't had a "bug" of any sort and FB, Google, etc. do not contact me.
marble falls
(57,106 posts)without charging its users for its services wants to cash in on all that information/intelligence.
When the Koch Brothers finally buy all of Congress, they will privatize the NSA. And google will get the contract.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I almost never post anything, and have the highest possible privacy settings.
I NEVER "like" anything, and I suspect it's clicking the "like" button that accounts for a lot of what I see on other FB pages.
TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)I don't like hanging out in the 'clouds'.....
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)A Deaf group of comedy fans.
It's a convenient way to communicate.
I just try to jam the bots when I can.