Sean Groubert, South Carolina State Trooper, Fired , Arrested After Shooting Unarmed Man
Source: Huff Post
A South Carolina state trooper was fired last week and arrested on Wednesday after a dashcam video showed him shooting an unarmed man during a routine traffic stop.
Former officer Sean Groubert, 31, is seen in the newly released video pulling over Levar Edward Jones. The clip, which was recorded on Groubert's dashcam on Sept. 4, shows Jones getting out of his vehicle at a gas station in Columbia.
Groubert asks Jones for his driver's license. As Jones reaches into his vehicle to retrieve it, Groubert shouts, "Get out of the car!"
When Jones complies and starts to back away from the vehicle, Groubert opens fire. Three shots can be heard; Jones was hit at least once, in the hip."I was just getting my license," Jones says. He also apologizes repeatedly, and asks, "Sir, why was I shot? All I did was reach for my license. I'm coming from work
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/25/sean-groubert-fired-arrested_n_5879694.html
Shot while following orders from a cop.
Cop Fired and arrested. ...Yes.....................so there is one honest police administrator in the entire U.S.A...and there was a TV record of exactly what happened ...
South Carolina Department of Public Safety Director Leroy Smith called the case disturbing. "After my review of the facts surrounding this matter, I have determined that Mr. Grouberts actions rose to such an extent that his employment with us must be terminated," Smith said in a statement last week. "While Mr. Groubert was within the law to stop Mr. Jones for a safety belt violation, the force administered in this case was unwarranted, inconsistent with how our troopers are trained, and clearly in violation of Department policies."
Ishoutandscream2
(6,663 posts)Stuart G
(38,439 posts)What is more, imagine how many incidents in this country are exactly like this, and the cop gets away scot free, no charges, no investigation, no nothing. A report is filed,and the report says, .. "the guy was reaching for a gun"....nothing happens.. How many? ....Thousands in my opinion....
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Amazing!
mountain grammy
(26,642 posts)About ready to give up on America.
BumRushDaShow
(129,337 posts)Ressurection of the Fugitive Slave Act.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Safety belt violation?????
Right up there with jay waking murders by cops!!!
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Sure they can have a few specially trained officers or SWAT team with gun when it's required, but the idea that everyone with a badge needs a gun is whats to blame here.
Bragi
(7,650 posts)Hosnon
(7,800 posts)The cop would have claimed he justifiably feared for his life and without this video, everyone would have believed him.
A body camera should be required for all law enforcement: Gun and badge? Here's your body camera. You are not an officer of the law if it is not on (with certain limited exceptions)."
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)calimary
(81,421 posts)Otherwise, he would have given the standard "stand your ground" defense, and because he was a cop, he would have been given the benefit of the doubt. BANK on it. It would have been his word against his victim's, and HIS word would have overruled that of his victim.
Paladin
(28,269 posts)I hope Mr. Jones gets a settlement in the high seven-figures for this outrage. And Groubert doesn't deserve another free day for the rest of his life. Jones had his empty hands held high above his head when that cop shot him---no potential threat whatsoever. Makes you want to puke.
LeftinOH
(5,357 posts)a different "official" story . You know it.
snort
(2,334 posts)Goddamit, don't you see? It's all about administering the proper amount of force on the people who hire and pay us to serve and protect them. Its not easy. Pop quiz, hotshot: Do I shoot grandma in the head or take out her poodle? Hmmm?
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)attempted murder!
heaven05
(18,124 posts)not very happy with this current KKKulture of racist pigs with guns, shooting and murdering. Modern day lynching is all this shit is. Watching that video has my blood boiling. Now let's see this fucker go to prison I hope. He will be known.
on edit: I am finally beginning to see what my parents and their parent had to face. Yeah we faced racism in my generation 50's-to 70's, then as the reactionaries were planning their next move, things quieted down somewhat. Then BAM!--Ronnie raygun was present and accounted for. It's been all downhill since then. A real dangerous slide going on now.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Because black people are ALL on welfare so they don't have nice stuff.
kirby
(4,442 posts)Without the camera, the cop would have sprinkled some crack on him and case closed.
Quayblue
(1,045 posts)+1 for the Dave Chapelle reference
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)CaptainTruth
(6,599 posts)In the video it looks like Jones drives from a parking lot (perhaps behind an apartment building?) around the corner into the gas station parking lot. At no time does he drive on a public street. He appears to drive from one private (?) parking lot into another adjacent private (?) parking lot.
If that is correct, does SC's seatbelt law apply to vehicles driven on private property? If it only applies to vehicles driven on public streets, then the officer's alleged reason for approaching Jones has no basis.
CaptainTruth
(6,599 posts)SC seat belt law:
http://www.buckleupsc.com/seat_belt_law.asp
SECTION 56-5-6520. Mandatory use of seat belt.
The driver and every occupant of a motor vehicle, when it is being operated on the public streets and highways of this State, must wear a fastened safety belt which complies with all provisions of federal law for its use. The driver is charged with the responsibility of requiring each occupant seventeen years of age or younger to wear a safety belt or be secured in a child restraint system as provided in Article 47 of this chapter. However, a driver is not responsible for an occupant seventeen years of age or younger who has a driver's license, special restricted license, or beginner's permit and who is not wearing a seat belt; such occupant is in violation of this article and must be fined in accordance with Section 56-5-6540.
--snip--
So, unless Jones was driving on a public street or highway before the start of the video, the stop was unlawful.
OnlinePoker
(5,725 posts)Since we can only see where the car is pointed, we can't see what the cop was looking at. It looks to me like Jones had just arrived at the gas station and the cop stopped, reversed, and turned back behind him so had probably seen him pull off the street without a seat belt on. Why he needed to automatically pull his gun for a minor traffic violation when Jones was already getting out of his vehicle is my question. There was no threat that could have justified doing that.
Sparhawk60
(359 posts)How can a cop lose his job, and even face possable jail time just for shooting an unarmed man. What is this country coming to? Next you will try and tell me cops are not above the law.
Sparhawk
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)They definitely aren't known for such...
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Unlike other jurisdictions that defend their officers actions no matter how egregious their behavior.