White House Rolls Out New Birth Control Accommodation For Nonprofits
Source: Huffington Post
The new accommodation will allow religious nonprofits, such as Catholic schools and hospitals, to opt out of covering birth control by notifying the Department of Health and Human Services of their objections. HHS and the Department of Labor will then arrange for a third-party insurer to pay for and administer the coverage for the nonprofits' employees so that women still receive the contraceptive coverage guaranteed to them by the Affordable Care Act.
Women across the country deserve access to recommended preventive services that are important to their health, no matter where they work, said Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell. Todays announcement reinforces our commitment to providing women with access to coverage for contraception, while respecting religious considerations raised by non-profit organizations and closely held for-profit companies."
The original accommodation required religious nonprofits to directly ask a third-party insurer to pay for and administer the contraception coverage if the nonprofit objected to covering it. But several nonprofits sued the administration over the rule, claiming that the act of filling out a form violated their religious beliefs by serving as a "permission slip" for its employees to use contraceptives.
The administration developed the new accommodation to pre-empt those lawsuits, which legal experts expected the Supreme Court to take up next year.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/22/birth-control-accommodation_n_5699352.html
The White House has a plan to get birth control to Hobby Lobby workers
http://www.vox.com/2014/8/22/6056653/contraceptives-hobby-lobby-accomodation-sotomayor?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=voxdotcom&utm_content=friday
(snip)
An accommodation for closely-held for-profits
(snip)
At a company like Hobby Lobby, for example, this would mean that the owners would notify the government of their objection to contraceptives. The Obama administration would then pass that information along to Hobby Lobby's health insurance plan, which would be responsible for paying for the birth control coverage.
(snip)
More leeway for religious non-profits
The White House will also give more leeway to religious non-profits, like hospitals and colleges, that do not want to comply with the contraceptive mandate.
These non-profits will no longer be required to notify their health plan that they will not provide contraceptives, as preliminary regulations would have required. Instead, these employers will now only be required to notify the federal government of their objection and the government will have the responsibility of notifying the insurance plan.
Obama Admin Offers Hobby Lobby Workaround On Birth Control
A new "proposed rule" by the Department of Health and Human Services lets female employees of for-profit businesses, like Hobby Lobby, obtain birth control directly from their insurer, at no extra cost, if their boss opts out of covering the service in the company's insurance plan for religious reasons.
(snip)
"The interim final regulations are consistent with the Court's order in Wheaton College, which required the objecting religious employers to write HHS letters
saying they refused to provide the coverage for religious reasons," said the official. "We will also provide a model notice that eligible organizations may, but are not required to use."
Despite the administrative actions, the HHS official called on Congress to pass a legislative solution to "ensure women get access to services they need."
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/obama-admin-hobby-lobby-workaround-birth-control
elleng
(130,973 posts)Because it is a PERMISSION SLIP for their employees to use contraception. They refuse to give their PERMISSION to use birth control. I hope everyone hears that and thinks very loooooooong and haaaaarrrrrrd about that.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)as long as people get the coverage they need?
savalez
(3,517 posts)lolly
(3,248 posts)To talk as if women were children who needed (or should be denied) "permission" to use birth control.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)the issue is...
free BC services for employees
nothing to do with availability
lolly
(3,248 posts)#4, mocking the companies objections to the workaround, calling it a "permission slip"
and then #5, Asking what difference it makes.
It's good that the workaround provides women with birth control; we should remember the attitude of the employers who hide behind "pro-life" claims but are, as their "permission slip" comments indicate, really into policing the behavior and morals of their female employees.
Triana
(22,666 posts)I'm grateful they're willing but really pissed that they're forced to do it in order for women to get coverage for the healthcare they need.
And - instead of taxpayers "paying for women's BC" (not that they ever DID because employees/individuals pay for it themselves with THEIR money to damn private insurers) - taxpayers get to pay for HHS to pass paper between themselves and insurance cos so women can get coverage for damn meds they need.
Jezus Efreckin Christmas. Red tape. More cost to taxpayers. PITA hassle. All so we don't "violate" the religulous objections of the religious control freaks.
Well said!
littlemissmartypants
(22,692 posts)ebbie15644
(1,215 posts)contraception coverage. Insurance companies should have this coverage "built in" to the rates.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)with their Morality Clauses, whoever pays for it, if they learn that their employees are even USING evil contraceptives. Every sex act must be "open" to God's will of CHILDREN.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)No matter the hoops the govt jumps through to accommodate "religious liberty", the fact is these women will have no options. They'll be fired for using birth control.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Archbishop Kurtz Provides Initial Response to Revised HHS Mandate Regulations
August 22, 2014
Disappointed that regulation will not expand exemption, only modifies accommodation
Extending accommodation to exempted businesses reduces religious freedom
More thorough study and detailed comments to come
WASHINGTONToday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that it is issuing an additional set of interim final rules to implement its requirement that health plans, including employer-sponsored plans, provide for sterilization, contraception, and drugs that can cause an abortion. In response, Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, Kentucky, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), provided the following statement:
The Administration is once again revising its regulations on the HHS mandate. We will study the regulations carefully and will provide more detailed comments at a later date. In keeping with our practice, we will evaluate the regulations according to the principles set forth in United for Religious Freedom, a March 2012 statement of the USCCB Administrative Committee that was later affirmed unanimously by the body of bishops at the General Assembly of June 2012.
On initial review of the governments summary of the regulations, we note with disappointment that the regulations would not broaden the religious employer exemption to encompass all employers with sincerely held religious objections to the mandate. Instead, the regulations would only modify the accommodation, under which the mandate still applies and still requires provision of the objectionable coverage. Also, by proposing to extend the accommodation to the closely held for-profit employers that were wholly exempted by the Supreme Courts recent decision in Hobby Lobby, the proposed regulations would effectively reduce, rather than expand, the scope of religious freedom.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)See post #11
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)if you are raping young boys.
Multiple indictments for sodomy this week in Alabama for church workers.
WWJD
Virgin birth? Sodomy? Pfft. It's biblical.
littlemissmartypants
(22,692 posts)Until we achieve that status we will continue to fight for our right to Healthcare along with everything else we have been denied.
Love, Peace and the Righteous Fight.
~ Lmsp
Wounded Bear
(58,667 posts)there is no freedom of religion.