BREAKING: New Leaker Disclosing U.S. Secrets
Last edited Tue Aug 5, 2014, 07:23 PM - Edit history (4)
Source: CNN
@cnnadam: EXCLUSIVE: US govt has concluded there's a new leaker exposing national security documents post-Snowden, @evanperez reporting. More soon.
CNN Breaking News - A new leaker is exposing national security documents, U.S. officials tell CNN. Reply STOP 2 unsub
updated 3:27 PM EDT 08.05.14
New leaker disclosing U.S. secrets
By Evan Perez, CNN
(CNN) - The federal government has concluded there's a new leaker exposing national security documents in the aftermath of surveillance disclosures by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, U.S. officials tell CNN.
Proof of the newest leak comes from national security documents that formed the basis of a news story published Tuesday by the Intercept, the news site launched by Glenn Greenwald, who also published the Snowden's leaks.
The Intercept article focuses on the growth in U.S. government databases of known or suspected terrorist names during the Obama administration.
The article cites documents prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center dated August 2013, which is after Snowden flew to Russia to avoid U.S. criminal charges.
Greenwald has suggested there was another leaker. In July, he said on Twitter "it seems clear at this point" that there was another. Government officials have been investigating to find out who.
The biggest database, called the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, now has 1 million names, a U.S. official confirmed to CNN.
That's boosted from half that many in the aftermath of the botched attempt by the so-called underwear bomber to blow up a U.S.-bound jetliner on Christmas Day in 2009.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/05/politics/u-s-new-leaker/index.html
@jeremyscahill: Direct links to SECRET gov't watchlisting documents we published today: https://t.co/ipgXej4e9R/s/XfGd & https://t.co/1YxO8QmCwj/s/f0Oq
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014/08/05/watch-commander/
NEWS
Barack Obamas Secret Terrorist-Tracking System, by the Numbers
By Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Devereaux5 Aug 2014, 12:45 PM EDT
Nearly half of the people on the U.S. governments widely shared database of terrorist suspects are not connected to any known terrorist group, according to classified government documents obtained by The Intercept.
Of the 680,000 people caught up in the governments Terrorist Screening Databasea watchlist of known or suspected terrorists that is shared with local law enforcement agencies, private contractors, and foreign governmentsmore than 40 percent are described by the government as having no recognized terrorist group affiliation. That category280,000 peopledwarfs the number of watchlisted people suspected of ties to al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah combined.
The documents, obtained from a source in the intelligence community, also reveal that the Obama Administration has presided over an unprecedented expansion of the terrorist screening system. Since taking office, Obama has boosted the number of people on the no fly list more than ten-fold, to an all-time high of 47,000surpassing the number of people barred from flying under George W. Bush.
If everything is terrorism, then nothing is terrorism, says David Gomez, a former senior FBI special agent. The watchlisting system, he adds, is revving out of control.
MORE
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Sounds like the "intelligence" establishment is trying to get out in front of the story.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Just guessing.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)That thing has been in enough hands by now to have fallen into the lap of a potential leaker, perhaps frustrated by all of the redactions.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)that got scooped. I didn't make the connection.
@jeremyscahill: The US government is rapidly acquiring biometric data on the million+ people in its secret database. https://t.co/KdzPnq9uqR/s/9fOl
herding cats
(19,566 posts)Proof of the newest leak comes from national security documents that formed the basis of a news story published Tuesday by the Intercept, the news site launched by Glenn Greenwald, who also published the Snowden's leaks.
The Intercept article focuses on the growth in U.S. government databases of known or suspected terrorist names during the Obama administration.
The article cites documents prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center dated August 2013, which is after Snowden flew to Russia to avoid U.S. criminal charges.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)@jeremyscahill: The US government is rapidly acquiring biometric data on the million+ people in its secret database. https://t.co/KdzPnq9uqR/s/9fOl
@GregMitch: RT @xor: The big news behind the AP/Intercept stories: docs are from Aug 2013-post-Snowden. New leaker. Courage is contagious. http://t.co/1pehGqHQqU/s/d_yn
I'm a bit off today. Just got out if the shower, lol.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)The government, it turned out, had "spoiled the scoop," an informally forbidden practice in the world of journalism. To spoil a scoop, the subject of a story, when asked for comment, tips off a different, typically friendlier outlet in the hopes of diminishing the attention the first outlet would have received. Tuesday's AP story was much friendlier to the government's position, explaining the surge of individuals added to the watch list as an ongoing response to a foiled terror plot.
The practice of spoiling a scoop is frowned upon because it destroys trust between the journalist and the subject. In the future, the journalist is much less willing to share the contents of his or her reporting with that subject, which means the subject is given less time, or no time at all, to respond with concerns about the reporting.
The government's decision to spoil a story on the topic of national security is especially unusual, given that it has a significant interest in earning the trust of national security reporters so that it can make its case that certain information should remain private.
After the AP story ran, The Intercept requested a conference call with the National Counterterrorism Center. A source with knowledge of the call said that the government agency admitted having fed the story to the AP, but didn't think the reporter would publish before The Intercept did. "That was our bad," the official said.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/05/terror-watch-list_n_5651757.html?1407262653
Something weird about the story, but maybe the big story is confirmation about how the government interferes with press freedom by playing favorites and giving advantages to media that plays the government's game. That's really ugly, but probably not illegal. Freedom. Can the Obama administration spell it? I wonder. I didn't expect better of the Bush administration. But surely Obama knows better.
On another issue, it is very hard to strike the balance between preventing terrorism and discriminating against people on the basis of religion or ethnicity. Really a tough call.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Mitigating this bullshit will require a team effort.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Too many, soon enough, for the personalized bullshit. This needs to be a movement.
Bring this motherfucking Hoover-Nixon Machine, V.2K14, down!
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)Has a nice clean ring to it!
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)I thought they had all been printed up in the Washington Post.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)screaming that the USG "stole" his scoop, lol
Psephos
(8,032 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)or Snowden are predictable and boring.
You all need to get some better talking points.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)instead of the AP story itself, so what makes him any different?
You will note I never have anything negative to say about Gellman's NSA work because it's tighter, better sourced, and better explained without the dramatic embellishments and bias...
But please--Continue to give me the usual treatment; I'm so very used to it by now...Call me a shill, a paid Pentagon plant, a troll, or any of the other garden variety insults...It is much easier that way, isn't it?
Actually it was Jeremy Scahill's story.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)but Greenwald has built his career playing below the belt...
And despite his protests, this happens a lot more often than you'd think -- So yes, Greenwald's petulant reaction amuses me to no end...
cui bono
(19,926 posts)articles.
All of a sudden when he exposes some dirty little secrets of the Obama admin he gets the swiftboat treatment. I get it.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Links, please.