Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 12:09 AM Mar 2012

White House offers to curtail drones

Source: Associated Press

White House offers to curtail drones
(AP)
27 March 2012

WASHINGTON — In a bid to save the CIA’s drone campaign against al-Qaida in Pakistan, US officials offered key concessions to Pakistan’s spy chief that included advance notice and limits on the types of targets. But the offers were flatly rejected, leaving US-Pakistani relations strained as President Barack Obama prepares to meet Tuesday with Pakistan’s prime minister.

CIA Director David Petraeus, who met with Pakistan’s then-spy chief, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha at a meeting in London in January, offered to give Pakistan advance notice of future CIA drone strikes against targets on its territory in a bid to keep Pakistan from blocking the strikes — arguably one of the most potent U.S. tools against al-Qaida.

The CIA chief also offered to apply new limits on the types of targets hit, said a senior U.S. intelligence official briefed on the meetings. No longer would large groups of armed men rate near-automatic action, as they had in the past — one of the so-called “signature” strikes, where CIA targeters deemed certain groups and behavior as clearly indicative of militant activity.

Pasha said then what Pakistani officials and its parliament have repeated in recent days: that Pakistan will no longer brook independent U.S. action on its territory by CIA drones, two Pakistani officials said. All the officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive negotiations.


Read more: http://www.khaleejtimes.com/displayarticle.asp?xfile=data/international/2012/March/international_March1023.xml&section=international&col=

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House offers to curtail drones (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2012 OP
They need to go back to the drawing board and use the drones purely to gather cstanleytech Mar 2012 #1
K&R. nt OnyxCollie Mar 2012 #2
We need a weapon that deactivates all weapons. truthisfreedom Mar 2012 #3
the guy that rejected the offer probably spends a lot of time looking @ the sky...n/t IamK Mar 2012 #4
I wonder how we would feel about a similar offer. EFerrari Mar 2012 #5
We'd probably reject it out of hand gratuitous May 2012 #11
We need to have a world wide treaty on killer drones Canuckistanian Mar 2012 #6
HOW about not having drones is the U$ of A too? burrowowl Mar 2012 #7
Spam deleted by gkhouston (MIR Team) Unaccountable May 2012 #8
Great! That'll free up more drones ... JustABozoOnThisBus May 2012 #9
k/r Solly Mack May 2012 #10

cstanleytech

(26,293 posts)
1. They need to go back to the drawing board and use the drones purely to gather
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:08 AM
Mar 2012

intelligence then and remove the weapons and go back to using real people on real verified threats so as to reduce the number of fubar missions.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
11. We'd probably reject it out of hand
Fri May 11, 2012, 03:48 PM
May 2012

But those doggone Pakistanis don't seem to appreciate just what good guys we are. Okay, sure, mistakes have been made, and some totally innocent people have been blown to Kingdom Come. But we're not mean people. We're not! At all. Hey, why is everyone looking somewhere else? This is the United Fucking States talking here!

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
6. We need to have a world wide treaty on killer drones
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 09:45 PM
Mar 2012

They're too easy to use, fired into unsecured areas based on intelligence that MAY not be accurate.

And despite the "surgical strike" claim, there are hundreds of innocents who die every year.

And the way the CIA uses them is NOT subject to review by the military or Congress. Hell, they don't even ADMIT to using them.

And besides, it's such a COWARDLY way to engage your enemy. Pushbutton death from a comfortable chair.

Can you imagine a rogue nation such as N. Korea getting a whole fleet of these?

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,350 posts)
9. Great! That'll free up more drones ...
Fri May 11, 2012, 03:10 PM
May 2012

for domestic surveillance in our cities and along the Mexican border.

It's a "win-win".

Do I need to say ...
.
.
.

?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House offers to cur...