Candy maker MARS to build a wind farm massive enough to fully power its 37 US factories
Source: Tree Hugger
The giant candy and pet food maker MARS Inc has taken a big step in the right direction by announcing that it will soon begin construction of a massive wind farm in Texas that will produce enough clean energyto power all of MARS' operations in the United States (they have 37 factories and 70 offices, so it's a pretty big deal). This is one of many steps that the company has been taking as part of its 'sustainable in a generation' plan:
<snip>
A gigantic 200-megawatt wind project
The wind farm will be erected near Lamesa, Texas, with 118 GE wind turbines (1.7MW each) producing annually about 800,000 megawatt-hours, equivalent to what it takes to power 61,000 U.S. households. This will be enough for MARS' 37 US factories, and represent about 24% of their global factory and office carbon footprint. Hopefully they keep rapidly improving that number and reach 100% before their target date.
Regardless of whether you buy MARS' products or not, it's better for the climate to have them manufactured with clean energy than with dirty one, so this is clearly a 'win'. It should also inspire other companies to do the same, so this move also has value as a potential catalyst.
Construction of the Texas wind farm will begin at the end of 2014, with about 10 turbines going up each week. It should be finished and fully operational by mid-2015. And to be clear, the wind farm will produce an amount of electricity equivalent to what they use across the US, it won't be directly connected to all those offices.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.treehugger.com/green-investments/candy-maker-mars-build-wind-farm-massive-enough-fully-power-its-37-us-factories.html
bananas
(27,509 posts)alittlelark
(18,890 posts)951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)[img][/img]
Chakab
(1,727 posts)father founding
(619 posts)a meeting of the RNC.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)the more catalysts, the better!!
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)They renames it SNICKERS ALMOND, but still kept the company name.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)bigworld
(1,807 posts)penultimate
(1,110 posts)Where I go from reading an article on Mars bars, to nougats, to praline, to Châteaus and ultimately end up reading about secret flying wings of the Luftwaffe....
I have a few questions about this.
How big an area of land will that take? Who owns that land? Who will the power actually go to and what will they be charged for it.
I don't think utilities should be privately controlled. I do like the idea of using wind for power as opposed to fossil fuels. I am just not sure that having mars candy supplying my power is the way I want to go.
or 39 square miles.
progressoid
(49,999 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)rotation and we will all surely die.
IronLionZion
(45,528 posts)Mmm....I like a good Snickers every now and then.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Last edited Sat May 3, 2014, 07:23 PM - Edit history (1)
I much prefer the idea of a wind farm to use of fossil fuels. I prefer the sight of wind farms to that of gigantic oil refineries or landscapes covered with oil derricks, or the sight of oil slicks in rivers,lakes and shorelines every time there's an oil spill. But frankly having seen entire desert panoramas blighted by thousands of these monstrosities in California, I hope we eventually find some other solution than covering acres and acres of the natural environment with them. I remember hearing on a science show on public radio back in the early 1970s some NASA scientists who said even back then that we had the technology to send gigantic solar panels into outer space to beam back the collected energy of the sun in the form of diffuse microwaves and it was only funding and the public will that was holding back the development of that more environmentally friendly approach..
mucifer
(23,565 posts)While being aware of this issue for more than ten years the international chocolate industry has only recently made some significant progress. Cadbury now has Fairtrade certification on its Dairy Milk branding, while Mars and Nestle have some products certified under the UTZ and Rainforest Alliance schemes (both called Fairtrade light by critics, as they offer producers no minimum or guaranteed price for their crop). These changes are positive but greater corporate responsibility is required to end child exploitation.
http://www.ethical.org.au/get-informed/issues/child-exploitation-and-chocolate/
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)but still better than coal and nukes.