49er fan sues NFL for $50M over playoff tickets
Source: AP
RENO, Nev. (AP) John E. Williams III has been a San Francisco 49ers fan since John Brodie was throwing touchdown passes at Candlestick Park in the 1970s. So he was excited about the prospects of scoring a ticket to make the trip to Seattle in January to watch the rivals battle in the NFC Championship Game.
But the Las Vegas man says in a $50 million lawsuit against the NFL that his hopes were dashed by the league and others he accuses of engaging in "economic discrimination" with an illegal ticket policy limiting credit-card sales to selected pro-Seattle markets. His lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas says it was part of an effort to keep 49er fans away and further promote the Seahawks' boisterous home-field advantage at CenturyLink Field.
"They're always boasting up there about their 12th player and everything else," Williams told The Associated Press on Friday. "But by allowing the NFL to decide who can or cannot attend the games, you make it an unfair game. Seattle fixed it."
Williams, who works as a promoter in the entertainment industry, said that because the NFL relies heavily on public subsidies and money from taxpayers to build stadiums. it should not be allowed to deny ticket sales to individuals on the basis they are "not from an area determined by the team or the NFL to be fan of that team."
Read more: http://pro32.ap.org/article/49er-fan-sues-nfl-50m-over-playoff-tickets
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Once those taxpayers have purchased all the tickets in their stadium that they wish to, those left over should go to anyone else.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)And those taxpayers don't seem to have much of a problem packing the Clink to the rafters.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)The 14th amendment says that all American citizens, not taxpayers, have to be treated equally. If this is truly a taxpayer funded resource, then denying citizens access to an otherwise public venue may indeed be a violation of Equal Protection. I haven't read the suit itself, but it will be interesting to see if this guys arguments go anywhere.
Interestingly, by the way, this kind of discrimination would be flat-out illegal in California. Under the terms of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, any business discriminating against a person merely based on their address can be shut down by the state, fined by the government, and sued civilly by everyone impacted by the ban. I get that Washington is probably a bit backward compared to California when it comes to these types of civil rights issues, but the Unruh Act probably explains why Californian's are so quick to sue over this sort of thing.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I actually like the idea of making sure the home team population has first pick. Why allow people in other states get the first pick.....we would really have the 1 percenters going to the games then and the welder who contributed to the community gets shut out.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)States can't regulate the press any more than the fed's can. And Equal Protection cases have a long history of enforcement at the state level.
I'm not actually sure that Equal Protection would apply in this case because the tickets were sold by a private third party, and the argument that private businesses have to comply with Equal Protection guidelines if they operate in taxpayer subsidized facilities isn't exactly established. But if the subsidies DO qualify the Super Bowl as a "government sponsored event", the state/federal delineation would not really matter the case.
groundloop
(11,519 posts)There's a lot wrong with the NFL, with it's tax exempt status being at the top of the list. But this suit has zero chance.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)laurent
(57 posts)Australia...... 1,542
Canada........ 1,450
Japan.......... 1,768
France......... 2,416
U.K. or
England....... 3,681
USA............ 5,806
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDQQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.harvard.edu%2Fprograms%2Folin_center%2Fpapers%2Fpdf%2FRamseyer_681.pdf&ei=8ptdU77yCMGBPcS1gNAP&usg=AFQjCNEO7QwIUcjI_F9iBABw6GwOEgK7lw&bvm=bv.65397613,d.ZWU
greiner3
(5,214 posts)alp227
(32,025 posts)laurent
(57 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Probably not the first time a person pretended to know what was or was not a frivolous lawsuit.
unblock
(52,243 posts)i'm not taking a view on the overall case, but i don't see how public funding provided by the city of seattle and/or the state of washington makes a compelling argument that people from san francisco should shouldn't have limited access.
if the nfl really benefited from federal tax breaks, the this would be a much better argument. but that isn't really the case. the federal tax breaks are trivial compared to state and local tax breaks:
http://www.ctj.org/taxjusticedigest/archive/2014/02/does_the_nfl_need_a_billion_do.php#.U12RGvldV8E
On the federal level, there has been a lot of attention paid to a push by Senator Tom Coburn to remove the NFL's (and other sports associations) tax exempt status, which he claims allows the league to receive millions in unwarranted tax breaks. In truth, the tax exempt status only applies to the league's organizing entity, which actually reported losses in recent years and is not currently being utilized as a "tax avoidance mechanism" according to tax experts.
Even if changing its status would cause the league to pay some additional taxes in the future, this amount will be a pittance compared to how much it receives in tax breaks from state and local governments, where the real tax avoidance is taking place.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)But he'll have a hard time proving damages.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)And I've never even seen that provision enforced. Hell, I've bought tickets from scalpers and sold them my extras with cops standing right there, both at Candlestick and at AT&T (though they were outside the lot on Jamestown and on the third street sidewalk, respectively, which might be just over the line of police interest.)
Mr.Bill
(24,296 posts)I don't see how missing a football game is worth 50 million dollars. When people sue for ridiculous sums like this, it makes their whole premise sound frivolous. At least to me, anyway.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)If city or state money have supported the team (eg in the stadium), then you might be able to justify giving residents from there priority. But why should someone from Hawaii, or Alberta, be able to buy tickets when someone from Nevada can't?
Bigredhunk
(1,349 posts)But a big $$ lawsuit is dumb as hell.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,004 posts)Bigredhunk
(1,349 posts)At your home stadium, you're obviously going to have a majority of the fans be for you. Gaming the system so fans of the opposing team can't buy tix (if their billing address is in another state) is ridiculous.
I think it's really funny from Seattle's perspective, given how much they brag about their "12th man." If your fans are so great, you shouldn't need to cheat to stack the deck more in your favor.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,004 posts)SF fans were not shut out.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Off the top of my head, the Washington Capitals will not take ticket orders from certain cities, specifically whom they are playing in the playoffs.
rep the dems
(1,689 posts)Got tired of Phillies fans (like myself) making the park our own until they realized they needed our money
rep the dems
(1,689 posts)Thinks his team lost because there weren't enough Niners fans there (even if he'd gotten to go he'd be completely outnumbered) and now wants 50 million dollars for it? Oy...
chknltl
(10,558 posts)Dennis Miller, (yeah THAT Dennis Miller*), suggested that patrons attending games at our stadium could consider seeking damages for hearing loss. I don't know if any hearing loss suffered at one of our games has the potential for permanency and it is not like everyone doesn't already know before they choose to attend the game about our 12th Man's reputation for getting LOUD. Maybe Dennis Miller is on to something or maybe he is just on something, (the way he and his assistant host giggle live constantly suggests the latter), regarding a lawsuit directed at Seahawks Promoters.
*(No I am NOT a fan of Dennis Miller. If it were up to me Dennis Miller's received trickle down economics would come as a golden shower. The only reason I am aware of his lawsuit proposal against the Seahawks Promoters is that for a while I had no access to any TV or internet and the ONLY media I had access to was in the form of a radio channel that gave me Stephanie Miller, Dennis Miller, Thom Hartmann and then some other conservative goon. Their idea of 'fair and balanced' I suppose)
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,004 posts)Seattle has a waiting list for season tickets. Season ticket holders are given first chance to buy playoff tickets. There are maybe 2000 tickets left after that. There was nothing preventing this guy from buying tickets on the secondary market. I was at that game. There were many 49er fans in the crowd.
Seriously even if he has a case which I doubt there's no way in hell he's due $50 million in damages.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)dembotoz
(16,806 posts)you can not put 13 eggs in a 12 egg carton