Russia's Lavrov: West plotting to control Ukraine
Source: Associated Press
MOSCOW (AP) -- Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has accused the West of plotting to control Ukraine and said the pro-Russian insurgents in the southeast would lay down their arms only if the Ukrainian government clears out the Maidan protest camp in the capital Kiev.
"The West wants - and this is how it all began - to seize control of Ukraine because of their own political ambitions, not in the interests of the Ukrainian people," Lavrov said on Friday.
U.S. President Barack Obama, speaking to reporters in Seoul, South Korea, said he will call key European leaders later Friday to discuss what's happened since a deal was reached last week in Geneval to de-escalate the crisis.
Russia and Ukraine had reached an agreement calling on all parties in the country to lay down arms and vacate public buildings. Pro-Russian militia have been occupying government buildings in more than 10 cities in eastern Ukraine while the nationalist Right Sector movement is still in control of two public buildings in Kiev.
Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_UKRAINE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-04-25-06-27-19
newfie11
(8,159 posts)It would not surprise me.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Any other conflict they'd rightly be called terrorists.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)That could involve supplying missiles in very small quantities perhaps one or a few at a time to carefully vetted rebels who would present videotaped evidence of their use before resupply, an approach proposed by Saudi officials, who would likely be the conduit for any transfer of the U.S.-made weapons.
http://election.democraticunderground.com/101691465
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)First deputy head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) - Head of the anti-terrorist center Vasyl Krutov has confirmed reports that a sniper fired at a helicopter that was standing at an airfield in Kramatorsk. The captain of the helicopter was injured in the resulting explosion.
http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/anti-terrorist-center-head-sniper-shoots-at-mi-8-helicopter-in-kramatorsk-its-captain-injured-345124.html
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)They are merely terms of propaganda, typically meaning someone using political violence of which we do not approve.
Those guys in eastern Ukraine could be called paramilitaries or armed civilians or guerrillas, or even Russian infiltrators.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37954.htm
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)Do they matter to you at all?
Or do you seek a desire for Moscow to "regain control of Ukraine", as your piece states?
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)care much about Ukrainians, staying top dog has priority.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/03/06/regional-polls-show-few-ukrainians-russians-want-a-united-single-state/
Initial Draft (Feb. 18, 1992)
1) Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either
on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on
the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant
consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we
endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources
would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to general global power.
2) The U.S. must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a
new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they
need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect
their legitimate interests. In non-defense areas, we must account sufficiently
for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from
challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and
economic order. We must maintain the mechanism for deterring potential
competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role.
http://www.yale.edu/strattech/92dpg.html
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)And I'm telling you right now, Ukrainians are not going to take kindly to such a notion.
Hell, I don't have to tell you. Ukrainians can tell you themselves:
http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-ukraine-russia-intervention-poll-20140424,0,6952561.story?track=rss#axzz2zuKzjQbv
The vast majority of Ukrainian voters oppose Russian military intervention in their country, even in the east and south where large Russian minorities live, a U.S.-funded poll by a Gallup affiliate showed Thursday.
The April 3-12 survey of 1,200 randomly selected Ukrainians of voting age by Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization found a nationwide average of 85% against any Russian military intervention, the International Republican Institute said in a summary of the poll paid for by the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Opposition to Russian intervention was predictably strongest in the western and central areas of Ukraine, where much of the population supports the country's eventual alliance with the European Union. The poll results showed 97% of voters in the western provinces and 94% in the central region that includes Kiev, the capital, responded in the negative when asked, "Do you support the decision of the Russian Federation to send its army into Ukraine under the pretext of protecting Russian-speaking citizens?"
But even in the eastern regions that are the scene of armed clashes between pro-Russia separatists and Ukrainian troops attempting to recover territory seized by the militants, 69% expressed opposition to Russian troops intruding in Ukraine's affairs.
http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-ukraine-russia-intervention-poll-20140424,0,6952561.story#ixzz2zuLQXypa
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)Since the figure refers to total U.S. aid commencing with the independence of Ukraine, in 1991. Something no one citing that figure ever manages to point out....
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)you'll find that since then Russia has ploughed over $200 billion into Ukraine for whatever reason.
By coincidence that's about the same as the amount foreseen to get Ukraine straight over a period of 10 years or so by way of repayable loans whatever - roughly equal to the entire bailout of Greece but without the write downs which occurred there.
treestar
(82,383 posts)what nerve!
Obnoxious_One
(97 posts)why are we helping a dictatorship?