Russia's Putin calls the Internet a 'CIA project'
Source: AP-EXCITE
By NATALIYA VASILYEVA
MOSCOW (AP) - President Vladimir Putin on Thursday called the Internet a CIA project and made comments about Russia's biggest search engine Yandex, sending the company's shares plummeting.
The Kremlin has been anxious to exert greater control over the Internet, which opposition activists - barred from national television - have used to promote their ideas and organize protests.
Russia's parliament this week passed a law requiring social media websites to keep their servers in Russia and save all information about their users for at least half a year. Also, businessmen close to Putin now control Russia's leading social media network, VKontakte.
Speaking Thursday at a media forum in St. Petersburg, Putin said that the Internet originally was a "CIA project" and "is still developing as such."
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140424/DADCI58G2.html
Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a media meeting organized by the Russian People's Front in St. Petersburg, Russia, Thursday, April 24, 2014. Russias President Vladimir Putin has mocked the Internet as a CIA project and pledged to protect Russias interest in the online industry. (AP Photo/RIA-Novosti, Mikhail Klimentyev, Presidential Press Service)
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)well you know what I mean. He is not rational. He and China and North Korea and and and other countries of that ilk are bent on isolating their people from the rest of the world.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)collect data or spy on its citizens' computer use? As Putin takes control of social media servers...excuse me while I
freshwest
(53,661 posts)ck4829
(35,077 posts)okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Imperatives: Why was In-Q-Tel Created?
As an information-based agency, the CIA must be at the cutting edge of information technology in order to maintain its competitive edge and provide its customers with intelligence that is both timely and relevant. Many times the Agency and the federal government have been the catalysts for technological innovations. Examples of Agency-inspired breakthroughs include the U-2 and SR71 reconnaissance aircraft and the Corona surveillance satellites, while the creation of the Internet was led by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
...
Faced with these realities, the leadership of the CIA made a critical and strategic decision in early 1998. The Agencys leadership recognized that the CIA did not, and could not, compete for IT innovation and talent with the same speed and agility that those in the commercial marketplace, whose businesses are driven by "Internet time" and profit, could. The CIAs mission was intelligence collection and analysis, not IT innovation. The leadership also understood that, in order to extend its reach and access a broad network of IT innovators, the Agency had to step outside of itself and appear not just as a buyer of IT but also as a seller. The CIA had to offer Silicon Valley something of value, a business model that the Valley understood; a model that provides those who joined hands with In-Q-Tel the opportunity to commercialize their innovations. In addition, In-Q-Tels partner companies would also gain another valuable asset, access to a set of very difficult CIA problems that could become market drivers. Once the Agencys leadership crossed these critical decision points, the path that led to In-Q-Tels formation was clear.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/additional-publications/in-q-tel/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-Q-Tel
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)richard3
(11 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Loveable Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg called his first few thousand users "dumb fucks" for trusting him with their data, published IM transcripts show. Facebook hasn't disputed the authenticity of the transcript.
Zuckerberg was chatting with an unnamed friend, apparently in early 2004. Business Insider, which has a series of quite juicy anecdotes about Facebook's early days, takes the credit for this one.
The exchange apparently ran like this:
Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
Zuck: Just ask.
Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
Zuck: People just submitted it.
Zuck: I don't know why.
Zuck: They "trust me"
Zuck: Dumb fucks
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)It's so obvious what Putin is up to. It has zero to do with protecting Russian speakers or "saving Ukraine" and all that other bs.
How can so-called liberal support these actions?
7962
(11,841 posts)Cha
(297,289 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)At least their legislators and public know it is coming, unlike ours.
and that speaks volumes.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)He's on the Senate Intelligence Committee. The question was rhetorical and Clapper couldn't really answer it. He later corrected the record after careful consideration with his lawyers.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)The New York Times reported June 11 Wyden knew immediately Clapper's testimony wasn't true, because Wyden is a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which receives secret briefings from top intelligence officials, including Clapper.
Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/07/02/Wyden-deeply-troubled-by-Clappers-domestic-spying-lie/UPI-69721372748400/#ixzz2zs2N3Y00
Pretty cool system we got set up here.
Too bad no one ever goes after these guys for perjury.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)ozone_man
(4,825 posts)Maybe it is true now even more than at the beginning as the NSA exerts more and more control.