Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 12:44 PM Apr 2014

Pornography Victims Get Partial Compensation, Supreme Court Says

Source: Bloomberg

By Greg Stohr Apr 23, 2014 12:15 PM ET

People convicted of possessing child pornography must pay victims a share of the economic losses they endured, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a decision that drew dissents from both directions.

A five-justice majority said each culprit must pay an amount that “comports with the defendant’s relative role” in the harm suffered by the victim. The ruling was a partial victory for Doyle Randall Paroline, who pleaded guilty to possessing as many as 300 pornographic images, including two of a girl identified as “Amy” in court papers.

The case forced the justices to grapple with how much impact a single possessor of a widely distributed pornographic image has on a victim. Although a 1994 federal law says victims are entitled to compensation, the measure doesn’t spell out how judges should calculate the sum.

“Defendants should be made liable for the consequences and gravity of their own conduct, not the conduct of others,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-23/pornography-victims-get-partial-compensation-court-says.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pornography Victims Get Partial Compensation, Supreme Court Says (Original Post) Purveyor Apr 2014 OP
The case was fictionalized recently here; also, "Supreme Court Resources" by actual litigant link. proverbialwisdom Apr 2014 #1
'Disappointment at the Supreme Court – Amy’s Reaction' by James R. Marsh proverbialwisdom Apr 2014 #2
Relative Role neffernin Apr 2014 #3

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
1. The case was fictionalized recently here; also, "Supreme Court Resources" by actual litigant link.
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 03:44 PM
Apr 2014
http://www.childlaw.us/law-order-svu-restitution-at-last/

Marsh Law Firm's ChildLaw Blog
Commentary, insight and analysis on children's law, policy and current issues.


This entry was posted in Child Pornography, Child Sex Abuse, Child Trafficking and Exploitation, Children's Legal Issues, Crime Victims, Restitution on April 4, 2014 by Marsh Law Firm.

Last night NBC’s Law & Order: SVU aired an episode about the Marsh Law Firm’s effort to obtain compensation for victims of child pornography called Downloaded Child. This clip, Restitution at Last, should sound familiar to anyone who has been following our work. They even mention the Violence Against Women Act and joint and several liability. Pop culture, we have arrived!

<>

About Marsh Law Firm
Marsh Law Firm is recognized worldwide as a premier law firm representing victims of sex abuse in schools, colleges, churches, foster care, and government and military institutions; online sexual exploitation; sexting; child pornography; child trafficking; sextortion; and revenge porn.We are among the few law firms in the country using innovative federal law approaches to help victims obtain justice nationwide.The intersection of criminal law, federal civil statutory remedies, Title IX, copyright, and criminal restitution makes this a challenging and unique area of the law requiring skilled litigators and creative thinkers. The lawyers at Marsh Law Firm have the experience and skills necessary to help victims rebuild their lives with dignity and respect.


http://www.childlaw.us/doyle-randall-paroline-vs-amy-unknown/

Doyle Randall Paroline vs. Amy Unknown Supreme Court Resources
Supreme Court Decision (April 23, 2014)

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
2. 'Disappointment at the Supreme Court – Amy’s Reaction' by James R. Marsh
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 03:47 PM
Apr 2014
http://www.childlaw.us/disappointment-at-the-supreme-court-amys-reaction/

Disappointment at the Supreme Court – Amy’s Reaction
Posted by James R. Marsh


“I am surprised and confused by the Court’s decision today. I really don’t understand where this leaves me and other victims who now have to live with trying to get restitution probably for the rest of our lives. The Supreme Court said we should keep going back to the district courts over and over again but that’s what I have been doing for almost six years now. It’s crazy that people keep committing this crime year after year and now victims like me have to keep reliving it year after year. I’m not sure how this decision helps anyone to really know if, when, and how restitution will ever be paid to kids and other victims of this endless crime. I see that the Court said I should get full restitution “someday,” I just wonder when that day will be and how long I and Vicky and other victims will have to wait for justice.”


http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/04/23/the-crime-victims-reaction-to-todays-supreme-court-decision/

The crime victim’s reaction to today’s Supreme Court decision
BY PAUL CASSELL
April 23 at 11:18 am
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pornography Victims Get P...