Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,038 posts)
Tue Apr 22, 2014, 05:46 PM Apr 2014

Court: Ohio man must pay $489,000 for false call

Source: AP

CINCINNATI (AP) — An Ohio man who was 19 when he made a false distress call that triggered a massive, 21-hour search on Lake Erie must pay $489,000 in restitution to the U.S. and Canadian agencies involved in the needless rescue effort, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

In a 2-1 ruling, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati found that a lower court properly ordered 21-year-old Danik Kumar of Sandusky to pay for all costs associated with the March 2012 search, launched after he reported seeing a fishing boat with four people on board sending up flares on Lake Erie as he was flying a small plane overhead.

About 70 personnel from the U.S. Coast Guard and the Canadian Coast Guard used three boats, a helicopter and a small plane before calling off the search.

A month later, Kumar told investigators that though he originally thought he saw a single flare go up, he never saw a boat, according to court records.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/court-ohio-man-must-pay-489000-false-call

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court: Ohio man must pay $489,000 for false call (Original Post) alp227 Apr 2014 OP
It makes me fear unintended consequences. surrealAmerican Apr 2014 #1
He was flying his Cessna and made a detailed report. Knowing it was untrue and that many were at freshwest Apr 2014 #2
That is a lot of money.... penultimate Apr 2014 #3
The real question is... Javaman Apr 2014 #4

surrealAmerican

(11,362 posts)
1. It makes me fear unintended consequences.
Tue Apr 22, 2014, 06:11 PM
Apr 2014

Will rulings like this make people less inclined to report actual emergencies?

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
2. He was flying his Cessna and made a detailed report. Knowing it was untrue and that many were at
Tue Apr 22, 2014, 07:06 PM
Apr 2014
work trying to save lives, he withheld the truth. but later admitted none of it was true.

He didn't make the call in good faith, I doubt any other person would have been fined to the extent he was. He knew exactly what was going to happen, and either a rescuer or a person truly in need could have died.

Good thing no one did.

http://www.mojosail.com/2013/08/20/half-million-dollar-fine-for-phony-distress-call/

http://www.justice.gov/usao/ohn/news/2013/19augkumar.html

penultimate

(1,110 posts)
3. That is a lot of money....
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 06:06 AM
Apr 2014

It was stupid of him to lie by saying he saw an actual boat with people in it. If he truly thought he saw a flare, that's all he should have reported. By lying, it puts the idea in peoples head that maybe he made it up so he could be involved in the search with the USCG. After all, being a pilot for coastguard has always been his dream... That may not be the case, but by lying, thoughts like that float around.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court: Ohio man must pay ...