UPDATED: Supreme Court upholds Michigan’s ban on affirmative action in college admissions
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) Supreme Court upholds Michigans ban on affirmative action in college admissions.
Read more: http://www.salon.com/2014/04/22/supreme_court_upholds_michigans_ban_on_affirmative_action_in_college_admissions/
Supreme Court upholds Mich. ban on college affirmative action
The justices said in a 6-2 ruling that Michigan voters had the right to change their state constitution to prohibit public colleges and universities from taking race into account in admissions decisions. The justices say that a lower federal court was wrong to set aside the change as discriminatory.
Justice Anthony Kennedy said voters chose to eliminate racial preferences because they deemed them unwise.
Kennedy said nothing in the Constitution or the courts prior cases gives judges the authority to undermine the election results.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor read her dissent aloud in the courtroom Tuesday. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg sided with Sotomayor in dissent.
more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/high-court-upholds-mich-affirmative-action-ban/2014/04/22/c903948a-ca28-11e3-b81a-6fff56bc591e_story.html
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Racism and bigotry in America has ended!
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)huge loans after graduation. The ones with money will get into the schools they apply for anyway because the schools need the money to keep perpetuating the system as it is. The students who need the financial aid and who are college material will get it to enter other schools. What prospective students need is jobs, training for good paying jobs that are needed in today's economy. There are people walking the streets with expensive college degrees looking for jobs. The economic system of privilege and racism is alive and well. Yet we rise!
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Democrats need not support affirmative action anymore because it would burden minorities with student loans, and colleges accept applicants regardless of race based on the college needing money?
And regardless of privilege and racism , the disproportionately smaller number of black college students and graduates, and disproportionately lower income of blacks, and the disproportionately higher unemployment rate of all educational levels of blacks, is offset because some blacks prevail anyway in the face of national institutionalized discrimination and bigotry?
Affirmative action is not a handout, it is a hand up in the face of actual racial outcomes. If we want equality and fairness, our American history shows it won't just happen.
The black comedian Chris Rock used to say, "There ain't a white man in America would trade places with me - and I'm rich!"
erpowers
(9,350 posts)The overall unemployment rate for college graduates is 8.9% while it is 22.9% for high school graduates and 31.5% for high school dropouts. In addition, Healthcare and Education majors have a 5.4% unemployment rate. Furthermore, college graduates tend to make more money than non college graduates. The median wage for college graduates is $57,000, but $26,000 for non college graduates.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/troyonink/2012/01/24/college-is-still-worth-it-but-jobs-and-pay-depend-on-major/2/
n2doc
(47,953 posts)rurallib
(62,432 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)On Tue Apr 22, 2014, 07:21 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
I see Uncle Thomas continues to vote to pull up the ladder behind him n/t
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=785544
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Enough already with the "Uncle Tom" shit. As a minority I find it very offensive to tell black people how they must vote and think.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Apr 22, 2014, 07:30 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Please! This post most certainly does NOT deserve a "hide" from Democrats. We all know that.
Someone's trying to pull a fast one, doing it very poorly.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I believe the poster was making the same point as the alerter. It is common usage and this justice plays the part - "a person who is slavish and excessively subservient to perceived authority figures".
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)I've been seeing a lot of frivolous alerts on the juries I've been on lately.
groundloop
(11,520 posts)I can imagine that at least a few more states will see this as granting them permission to end affirmative action, or am I reading too much into this?
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)I suspect the petitions to place the question of AA on state ballots are being drawn up right this second
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)to overturn it.
The rest of the affirmative action jurisprudence did not have that distinction.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Would he allow slavery if the voters wanted it?
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)Notwithstanding the fact that Constitutional rights -- whether it be marriage or personal freedom -- are not subject to majority vote, the Roberts court may be fabricating a principle where exactly that is used to undermine individual's rights.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)AlinPA
(15,071 posts)undermine the election results. That sounds like "the majority rules".
kokobell616
(35 posts)Left to their own devices the republican held majority in Michigan takes yet another page out of ALEC's playbook to promote the white upper class at the detriment of those less fortunate.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,586 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)It's about if it's constitutional or not. Stephen Breyer seems sided with the majority.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)just disappointment and outrage at the ability of 4 very small minded men to be able to destroy the dreams of millions. Democracy, color blind society, the rectification of generations of disparity of opportunity based on race? Nope, not yet. True SCOTUS for the oligarchy and their offspring. What a sad, sad joke this so called democracy is. To think all this is push back from the right wing, since Reagan, for the rights won by women and minorities guaranteeing rights for the dispossessed and racially hated. The right to an equal chance for everyone in this society is shown once again to a sham based on empty words.
bob27
(40 posts)A report called Admissions and Public Higher Education in California, Texas and Florida: The Post-Affirmative Action Era found that Asian-American students particularly benefitted from the state of Californias Proposition 209, which banned state entities from using affirmative action in 1996.
After the bans implementation, for instance, the percentage of Asian Americans at the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) grew from 37.3% in 1995 to 43.6% in 2000. Since then, according to the report, the number and percentage of Asian Americans has reached 46.6% at the school.
http://racerelations.about.com/od/thelegalsystem/a/WhoBenefitsfromAffirmativeActionsBaninUniversities.htm
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)Kennedy said nothing in the Constitution or the courts prior cases gives judges the authority to undermine the election results. So now a majority of MI voters can take rights away from any minority group.
IMO, this ruling will change a hell of a lot in this country.