Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,686 posts)
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 09:52 PM Apr 2014

Reeva Steenkamp 'shot as she stood at the door arguing with Pistorius'

Source: Independent.ie

AISLINN LAING, PRETORIA

REEVA Steenkamp was pleading to her boyfriend Oscar Pistorius from behind their locked bathroom door when he shot her dead, the prosecutor in the Paralympian's trial claimed yesterday.

Prosecutor Gerrie Nel said it was "the only reasonable explanation" for why Pistorius gunned down the model at his Pretoria home in the early hours of St Valentine's Day last year.

He said the 27-year-old athlete's claim that he killed Steenkamp thinking she was an intruder who had climbed through his bathroom window and locked themselves in the lavatory was "so far-fetched" as to be "improbable".

"She wasn't scared of an intruder," Nel told Pistorius, revealing the state's theory on motive for the first time.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/reeva-steenkamp-shot-as-she-stood-at-the-door-arguing-with-pistorius-30179357.html





Oscar Pistorius is seen leaving the high court in Pretoria, South Africa. Pistorius is charged with the murder of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp, on Valentines Day in 2013. Photo: AP
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reeva Steenkamp 'shot as she stood at the door arguing with Pistorius' (Original Post) Omaha Steve Apr 2014 OP
Oscar is chuckstevens Apr 2014 #1
I've listen to about half of his testimony Scairp Apr 2014 #30
Do the forensics support that theory? BainsBane Apr 2014 #2
the prosecutor said elleng Apr 2014 #3
South Africa is a scary place... leftieNanner Apr 2014 #4
True, but according to a DUer from SA, this occurs mostly in outlying and rural areas. Urban whites LuckyLib Apr 2014 #7
Hopefully justice will be served BillZBubb Apr 2014 #5
For 1st Degree Manslaughter.... SoCalMusicLover Apr 2014 #16
i hope for appropriate sentence for second degree murder Liberal_in_LA Apr 2014 #21
He never quickly checked whether she was in the bed beside him before he went towards the bathroom? marew Apr 2014 #6
I hope they throw away the key in his case. lululu Apr 2014 #8
It's one thing to say you disbelieve his story. Quite another to make up facts not in evidence. He 24601 Apr 2014 #9
Excuse me but... marew Apr 2014 #11
Precisely, so with the actions not in dispute, why does the prosecutor have to scream at him rather 24601 Apr 2014 #14
No jury in SA u4ic Apr 2014 #17
Point taken, If I were the judge then, I would caution the persecutor, then if persists, acquit. 24601 Apr 2014 #18
Judge Did erpowers Apr 2014 #20
She left when he was having a breakdown. joshcryer Apr 2014 #22
It didn't go unnoticed u4ic Apr 2014 #27
That is YOUR interpretation! marew Apr 2014 #23
Right, they never scream over here Scairp Apr 2014 #31
Why would anyone shoot through a door, if they didn't know who was there? kwassa Apr 2014 #10
Exactly! n/t marew Apr 2014 #12
It isn't like he isn't a proven gun nut ripcord Apr 2014 #13
Yes, it was accidental... marew Apr 2014 #24
How many people LOCK the bathroom door... Ino Apr 2014 #15
Exactly! marew Apr 2014 #25
To believe Pistorius, one would have to believe he was trying to defend himself and her (as he LisaL Apr 2014 #19
his story is utterly ridiculous Skittles Apr 2014 #26
It is a part of probability that many improbable things will happen. Agathon (445 - 400 BC) cqo_000 Apr 2014 #28
And virtually all of the evidence.. sendero Apr 2014 #29

Scairp

(2,749 posts)
30. I've listen to about half of his testimony
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 06:31 PM
Apr 2014

And it is unmitigated bullshit. There is no way on earth he didn't know it was her behind that door and/or that she was or was not in the same bed with him. Even if he at first thought it could be an intruder, she would have been yelling at him "it's just me!!!" or yanked the door open to show him. I know I would have. The only plausible explanation that might hold water is that they had a spat before bedtime and she chose to sleep elsewhere in the house and made a trip to the toilet in the middle of the night. But he didn't say that's what happened, he said they were sleeping in the same bed that night. Love that prosecutor though. He has totally thrashed Pistorius. And his antics in court have left me with my eyes rolling. What a bad actor.

BainsBane

(53,041 posts)
2. Do the forensics support that theory?
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 10:01 PM
Apr 2014

Everything I've read said she was on the toilet, not standing right behind the door.

leftieNanner

(15,137 posts)
4. South Africa is a scary place...
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 10:06 PM
Apr 2014

we have friends from there. People break into houses all the time, which is why anyone with any money at all has serious bars on the windows and doors. So for him to claim that he thought it was an intruder in his bathroom is absurd. I'm sure with his money, his house is like Fort Knox. Pistorius is a complete creep, an abuser, and a murderer. Jail for life. (I don't believe in the death penalty.)

LuckyLib

(6,819 posts)
7. True, but according to a DUer from SA, this occurs mostly in outlying and rural areas. Urban whites
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 10:52 PM
Apr 2014

with well-protected homes in gated communities are not likely to be victimized. If he was so worried, why not hire a security guard for his own house? I think he heard her talking or texting on her cell phone in the bathroom, got jealous, and lost it. Already a trigger happy gun nut with multiple experiences losing his temper in public places. And the hot-headed jealous type. Lethal combination .

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
16. For 1st Degree Manslaughter....
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 02:46 PM
Apr 2014

Life w/o possibility of parole is the max.

25 years is the max if she determines it was not premeditated, and she finds guilty on the other gun charges he's facing.

marew

(1,588 posts)
6. He never quickly checked whether she was in the bed beside him before he went towards the bathroom?
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 10:39 PM
Apr 2014

And he never asked who was in the bathroom?

It is my understanding one never shoots without knowing what they're shooting at!

I agree with the prosecutor- I simply do not buy his story.

 

lululu

(301 posts)
8. I hope they throw away the key in his case.
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 10:53 PM
Apr 2014

"It is my understanding one never shoots without knowing what they're shooting at!"

I live by myself. If I heard someone in my house after dark, I'd be terrified and likely to shoot them (if I had a gun, which I don't.)

On the other hand, I find it incredibly unbelievable that someone living with someone else would shoot without knowing where their partner was. The death rate for people getting midnight snacks would be high...

24601

(3,962 posts)
9. It's one thing to say you disbelieve his story. Quite another to make up facts not in evidence. He
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 11:01 PM
Apr 2014

would cause a mistrial in the US.

I wonder what would happen if Oscar responded, "I can't really hear accurately when you, a supposed officer of the court, scream inches from my face. Perhaps if you backed-up three feet and spoke like an educated person, I could understand the rants."

Kangaroo courts shouldn't be condoned on DU, even for unpopular defendants. There are other places for that.

marew

(1,588 posts)
11. Excuse me but...
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 01:12 AM
Apr 2014

This dude ALREADY admitted he did NOT check to see where his girlfriend was! I did not make that up! He admitted such to the prosecutor...

24601

(3,962 posts)
14. Precisely, so with the actions not in dispute, why does the prosecutor have to scream at him rather
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 12:13 PM
Apr 2014

than conduct himself like a human?

If I were on the jury, I would inform the judge that unless the state cleans up its act, there will be no chance of a unanimous guilty verdict, period.

24601

(3,962 posts)
18. Point taken, If I were the judge then, I would caution the persecutor, then if persists, acquit.
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 05:30 PM
Apr 2014

Even scum deserve a fair trial.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
20. Judge Did
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 08:10 PM
Apr 2014

She did not go as far as you suggested, but she did tell the prosecutor to be nicer to Pistorius. From what I saw she did not threaten to acquit, but she said something along the line of that prosecutor needed to conduct himself in a more professional manner.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
22. She left when he was having a breakdown.
Sun Apr 13, 2014, 04:05 AM
Apr 2014

I am not one for tribunals (because the jury system is proven to be more accurate; and even it sends thousands of innocent people to jail). But I think the judge is trying her best.

You're right though that the prosecutor was out of line.

marew

(1,588 posts)
23. That is YOUR interpretation!
Sun Apr 13, 2014, 09:20 AM
Apr 2014

I would say the murderer here is the one, historically, who has not acted like a human. The murderer, if you have noticed, has a LONG history of denying responsibility for anything!
"If I were on the jury, I would inform the judge that unless the state cleans up its act, there will be no chance of a unanimous guilty verdict, period." Really? Reality check! They do not, I repeat NOT, have a jury system- NO JURY SYSTEM- so I must question that you know what you are talking about. This judge has a history of being tough. I suspect she knows what she is doing even if you don't and you insist on second guessing her!

Scairp

(2,749 posts)
31. Right, they never scream over here
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 06:36 PM
Apr 2014

I take it you've never watched an actual murder trial held before? Prosecutors in this country yell at the defendants too. It isn't isolated to South African courtrooms I can promise you that.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
10. Why would anyone shoot through a door, if they didn't know who was there?
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 11:32 PM
Apr 2014

Firing a gun on someone is the ultimate in seriousness, and fearing an intruder WITHOUT SEEING THEM is hardly justification for shooting.

Pistorius is either psycho or lying.


ripcord

(5,492 posts)
13. It isn't like he isn't a proven gun nut
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 02:04 AM
Apr 2014

He discharged a firearm in a restaurant, he is the blade gunner.

marew

(1,588 posts)
24. Yes, it was accidental...
Sun Apr 13, 2014, 09:22 AM
Apr 2014

But he asked another fellow at the table to say he did it. Classy, huh?

Ino

(3,366 posts)
15. How many people LOCK the bathroom door...
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 12:33 PM
Apr 2014

unless they are afraid of someone coming in after them? She locked him out, so he shot through the door to "get her."

marew

(1,588 posts)
25. Exactly!
Sun Apr 13, 2014, 10:08 AM
Apr 2014

Of course, the only family members in my house who violate my privacy are my two very sweet rescue cats who insist on accompanying me and sit on the side of the tub till we're done. That I can deal with! LOL!

LisaL

(44,974 posts)
19. To believe Pistorius, one would have to believe he was trying to defend himself and her (as he
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 06:28 PM
Apr 2014

claims he was concerned for her safety), yet he never checked on her after he heard that supposed intruder, even though they were sleeping in the same bed.
That doesn't sound very believable.

cqo_000

(313 posts)
28. It is a part of probability that many improbable things will happen. Agathon (445 - 400 BC)
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 05:10 AM
Apr 2014

It is a part of probability that many improbable things will happen. Agathon (445 - 400 BC).


The lawyer claims the story was was "so far-fetched" as to be "improbable".

Well that doesn't mean the story is not true. Absurdly improbable things happen all the time. Like a father mistaking a 3 year old toddler for an intruder.

http://articles.latimes.com/1987-08-07/news/mn-1122_1_gun-father-borrowed

It would be wrong to find Pistorius guilty based on a lazy theory. The only thing that counts is evidence!

sendero

(28,552 posts)
29. And virtually all of the evidence..
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 07:35 AM
Apr 2014

... says they had a fight and he shot her. End of story. And I for one am glad it is a judge hearing this case and not some collection of morons as you'd likely find on an American jury.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Reeva Steenkamp 'shot as ...