Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 10:24 AM Apr 2014

Supreme Court won’t hear anti-gay photographer case

Source: Washington Blade

The U.S. Supreme Court announced on Monday it won’t take up a case in which a New Mexico photography business alleges its rights were violated when it landed in hot water for refusing to shoot a same-sex wedding ceremony.

In orders published Monday morning, the court listed the case, Elane Photography v. Willock, without comment among as the cases it won’t consider.

The case was brought to the Supreme Court by Elane Photography, which was found to have violated New Mexico’s anti-discrimination law for refusing to take a photo for the same-sex wedding ceremony for Vanessa Willock and Misti Collinsworth in 2006. (The wedding was only ceremonial because the incident took place before the state legalized same-sex marriage.)

Elane Photography filed lawsuit in state court, alleging that its refusal to photograph a same-sex wedding is protected on religious grounds. However, the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled against the claims, saying the businesses service can be regulated because it’s a public accommodation. Following that decision, Elane Photography asked the U.S. Supreme Court to consider the lawsuit based on First Amendment protections under the U.S. Constitution.

Read more: http://www.washingtonblade.com/2014/04/07/supreme-court-wont-hear-n-m-photographer-case/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court won’t hear anti-gay photographer case (Original Post) Newsjock Apr 2014 OP
That's good. R&K nt longship Apr 2014 #1
at first glance I thought that said anti-gay "pornographer" which would make no sense yurbud Apr 2014 #2
really ugly people engaging in gay sex acts? dsc Apr 2014 #3
in other words, Fred Phelps in Hell yurbud Apr 2014 #5
Hetro-sex? saules0gaisma Apr 2014 #4
Iv'e seen hetro combined with post #3 that were bad enough to make a straight gay yurbud Apr 2014 #6

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
2. at first glance I thought that said anti-gay "pornographer" which would make no sense
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 10:53 AM
Apr 2014

How would you make anti-gay pornography?

dsc

(52,166 posts)
3. really ugly people engaging in gay sex acts?
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 11:20 AM
Apr 2014

who call themselves ugly names to show it is so awful?

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
6. Iv'e seen hetro combined with post #3 that were bad enough to make a straight gay
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 11:35 AM
Apr 2014

The HBO documentary series REAL SEX comes to mind, or the doc about a real brothel.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court won’t hear ...