Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 03:56 PM Apr 2014

Jeb Bush Says He Will Decide On 2016 By The End Of The Year

Source: TPM

CAITLIN MACNEAL – APRIL 6, 2014, 3:50 PM EDT

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) on Sunday said that he'll make a decision whether to run for president in 2016 by the end of this year, according to the Washington Post.

Bush said he would base his decision on whether a candidate can "run with a hopeful, optimistic message, hopefully with enough detail to give people a sense that it’s not just idle words and not get back into the vortex of the mud fight."

He also said he needed to consider how a bid for the White House would impact his family. "I just don’t want to go through that until the right time," he said. "And it turns out that not running has generated more interest than if I said I was running. It’s kind of weird. I’m not that smart, I promise you, it just kind of happened that way."

Bush also weighed in on issues like immigration. He said that the U.S. needs to address its immigration system, and that undocumented immigrants haven't necessarily committed a felony, but an "act of love."

###

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jeb-bush-2016-decision



Jeb Bush: Illegal Immigration Not Always A 'Felony,' Sometimes An 'Act Of Love'

CAITLIN MACNEAL – APRIL 6, 2014, 3:20 PM EDT161

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) on Sunday said that it shouldn't be considered a felony every time a person enters the country illegally, according to the Washington Post. He said that many come to the U.S. without documentation "because they couldn’t come legally, they come to our country because their families — the dad who loved their children — was worried that their children didn’t have food on the table."

"And they wanted to make sure their family was intact, and they crossed the border because they had no other means to work to be able to provide for their family," Bush continued. "Yes, they broke the law, but it’s not a felony. It’s an act of love. It’s an act of commitment to your family. I honestly think that that is a different kind of crime that there should be a price paid, but it shouldn’t rile people up that people are actually coming to this country to provide for their families."

Bush spoke at an event celebrating the 25th anniversary of the presidency of his father, former President George H.W. Bush. The interview was later broadcast on Fox News.

Jeb Bush also said that the U.S. needs a better way to address those who came to the country legally, but overstayed their visas. "A great country ought to know where those folks are and politely ask them to leave," he said, according to the Post.

###

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jeb-bush-immigration-felony
98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeb Bush Says He Will Decide On 2016 By The End Of The Year (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2014 OP
How many times do we have to say it... SoapBox Apr 2014 #1
I warned everyone here billhicks76 Apr 2014 #31
You are 100% correct. Obama rescued the Republican brand and in process enabled the extreme pragmatic_dem Apr 2014 #38
Clinton's Did The Same billhicks76 Apr 2014 #44
HOPE AND CHANGE! Skittles Apr 2014 #45
Lord Help Us billhicks76 Apr 2014 #46
as someone who lives in Texas (we put up with SIX EXTRA YEARS OF DUBYA) Skittles Apr 2014 #64
yep - history repeats itself, Obama was consulting Bush, Condi et all for Afghanistan surge pragmatic_dem Apr 2014 #71
absolutely correct billhicks76! Thank you! wildbilln864 Apr 2014 #43
Tad early to be saying "I told you so." don't you think? yellowcanine Apr 2014 #48
I've Heard Jebs Name Since 2008 billhicks76 Apr 2014 #82
I can see what you mean, BH, but... IkeRepublican Apr 2014 #83
I wish billhicks76 Apr 2014 #86
A corrupt smuggler FLOTUS with her drug addled kids Submariner Apr 2014 #2
Petty crap LuvLoogie Apr 2014 #34
"An act of love" brucefan Apr 2014 #3
Like a bad dream...nt Jesus Malverde Apr 2014 #4
No more Bushes! No more Bushes! No more Bushes! Dawson Leery Apr 2014 #5
Snort Solly Mack Apr 2014 #6
He's right. He's not that smart. louis-t Apr 2014 #7
Yeah, because this country is desperate for another Bush Warpy Apr 2014 #8
Listen to your mama, Jeb. 3catwoman3 Apr 2014 #9
.... DeSwiss Apr 2014 #10
Good Grief, I need Maalox. n/t Paper Roses Apr 2014 #11
This sounds like a big fat no flamingdem Apr 2014 #12
Also in the head, if he thinks he can win. QuestForSense Apr 2014 #22
The GOP has no other "establishment republican" to foist on the knuckle-draggers... Tom Ripley Apr 2014 #13
They don't. They have no one who's not a complete crook or godbag. I swear, Nay Apr 2014 #29
We've already jumped. Clinton/Bush will just confirm it. AAO Apr 2014 #74
Some conservatives, like Michelle Malkin, can't stand Jeb Bush anobserver2 Apr 2014 #14
It serves a purpose. It actually helps Jeb's image. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #33
even if he's not elected, he'll just be sElected. magical thyme Apr 2014 #88
Whatever Democratic candidate Jeb faces Enthusiast Apr 2014 #92
unfortunately Hillary is a war hawk. Not only yes on Iraq, but she pushed the disastrous magical thyme Apr 2014 #94
3 Bushes? Why don't they just call themselves "the royal family." JDPriestly Apr 2014 #15
Equating the Clintons with the Bushes is a crock of shit. LuvLoogie Apr 2014 #36
Yeah, because they are both the same. Beacool Apr 2014 #49
Both represent family dynasties. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #53
First, the Clintons are not a dynasty unless Chelsea runs for office too. Beacool Apr 2014 #57
Sorry, Beacool. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #68
I'm tired of the constant arguing. Beacool Apr 2014 #97
Mark this liberal Democratic voter who will vote 3rd party Todays_Illusion Apr 2014 #95
Then you better not utter a peep if a Republican wins in 2016. Beacool Apr 2014 #96
In the Words of Willy Wonka..... chuckstevens Apr 2014 #16
Brilliant announcement Mr.Bill Apr 2014 #17
Are we supposed to hold our breaths until then? aint_no_life_nowhere Apr 2014 #18
I love it: "Just enough detail to give a sense it's not just bullshit, not enough to spur debate"... Journeyman Apr 2014 #19
NO AndyTiedye Apr 2014 #20
He'd "Win". The Machinez are Still Programmed AndyTiedye Apr 2014 #21
"I’m not that smart" beac Apr 2014 #23
Don't take him lightly lark Apr 2014 #24
Your problem is being "scared." Progressives need to harden their spines. Enough jellyism. RBInMaine Apr 2014 #30
Clinton might kick his ass, but Hillary is not progressive on economic issues, foreign policies yurbud Apr 2014 #51
Being scared doesn't mean being immobile or helpless. lark Apr 2014 #56
He could be the next President. n/t jtuck004 Apr 2014 #25
Can he defeat Hillary? Manuel Beingman Apr 2014 #76
Yes n/t jtuck004 Apr 2014 #77
We have a large population here in America Stargazer09 Apr 2014 #26
yes, but what makes you think it's our choice? magical thyme Apr 2014 #89
True, true Stargazer09 Apr 2014 #91
you and me both... magical thyme Apr 2014 #93
"The Family," the shadowy rightwing religious Cult that runs the Prayer Breakfast said "Expect great blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #27
Jeb, let me help you with your decision...... Hoppy Apr 2014 #28
Oh, he's running alright. It's enough to turn the stomach. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #32
The nomination is his for the asking. RandySF Apr 2014 #35
I see. Bush vs. Clinton, a clean slate, fresh leadership, a bold new direction... pragmatic_dem Apr 2014 #37
would you like your corporate rule with a side of gay bashing or gay hugging? yurbud Apr 2014 #54
well said. nt pragmatic_dem Apr 2014 #70
I don't believe in dynasty political figures this includes Hilary gate of the sun Apr 2014 #39
He has already decided. aurelio17 Apr 2014 #40
that's going to lose him more jethroes than gain him Latinos yurbud Apr 2014 #41
The Bushes manage to leave the country progressively weaker and worse off TwilightGardener Apr 2014 #42
and their personnel fortunes larger. olddad56 Apr 2014 #65
I think that his handlers have already decided, they are just waiting for the right time. olddad56 Apr 2014 #47
Jeb should run, the last two Bushes were so great for the country. Beacool Apr 2014 #50
Be shocked if he didn't run BeyondGeography Apr 2014 #52
Fox ran their "A Bush Family Albumn" almost on an endless loop over the weekend. NorthCarolina Apr 2014 #55
I'll decide for you, Jebbie---that would be a NO Demeter Apr 2014 #58
Biggest clown in the clown car, but he is the only clown that could unite all elements in the Repig JCMach1 Apr 2014 #59
Jeb Bush has a few political skeletons banging around in his closet. yellowcanine Apr 2014 #60
the suspense is killing me! frylock Apr 2014 #61
the only real question is, will his running mate be Palin or Putin? olddad56 Apr 2014 #66
Depressed jmm123 Apr 2014 #62
Read my lips. KamaAina Apr 2014 #63
The keyboard warrior wing of the GOP is absolutely terrified that Bush is going to be the nominee... Tom Ripley Apr 2014 #67
The United States needs another Bush... lanlady Apr 2014 #69
No Jeb, we'll tell you. Just stay close to your phone. AAO Apr 2014 #72
Jeb was supposed to be Prez, not Dubya, in Bush senior's plans. aurelio17 Apr 2014 #73
Yes, Jeb was the Anointed Son. Manuel Beingman Apr 2014 #75
A Republican who is sane on Immigration will never be president elaristotle Apr 2014 #78
Decider II: Electric Bungleoo Blue Owl Apr 2014 #79
The Bushitter.3 has decided long ago calguy Apr 2014 #80
Did HRC give a date for her announcement? rpannier Apr 2014 #81
I'm betting he'll run agent46 Apr 2014 #84
Translation: The PNAC'ers are in it to win it silvershadow Apr 2014 #85
I ever there was a chance for a repeat of 2000 election here it Is! Liberalman777 Apr 2014 #87
Lonely Little Lad 12kbush Apr 2014 #90
In other words, a Republican Congress would make the job easy... Orsino Apr 2014 #98
 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
31. I warned everyone here
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 09:09 PM
Apr 2014

I warned everyone here that because Obama rolled over and not pursue Bush crimes to "move forward" like Clinton did in '92 after Bush Sr crimes that all he was doing was rehabilitating the Bush name and resurrecting the republican brand which had been all but destroyed. We reap what we sow. People argued with me because they would defend anything as long as it was Obama who did it much like those who defended Bush earlier. In my opinion Obama changed after flip flopping on telecom immunity before the 2008 election. I felt that they had gotten to him somehow. It didn't look good when Obama had a private meeting with Jeb and Daddy Bush in 2009 as reported by the Dallas newspapers but a guy like Jimmy Carter was allowed no where near the White House. It's Jeb vs Hillary in 2016...prescripted. I called it then while die hard defenders called me names. Not so absurd now is it.

 

pragmatic_dem

(410 posts)
38. You are 100% correct. Obama rescued the Republican brand and in process enabled the extreme
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 12:17 AM
Apr 2014

right wing to gain credibility. Meanwhile, Democratic leadership wants liberals to shut the fuck up and stay in the closet for fear that we will embarrass them in front of their corporate friends.

You reap what you sow.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
44. Clinton's Did The Same
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 02:39 AM
Apr 2014

And because we were supposed to "look forward not back" after IranContra and Iraqi banking crimes by the Bush cartel we got the entire team back in 2000 as if they had just agreed to share power. After the 2000 election they all took their masks off as indicated by Bill Clinton playing golf with the evil Bush Sr every other week and Bush Sr publicly referring to Bill as his 5th son. Too many liberals just weren't paying attention and stuck in their pre-prescribed belief systems which may yield yet ANOTHER Bush presidency with all their peers in positions of power. Wake the hell up...this is getting annoying.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
46. Lord Help Us
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 06:39 AM
Apr 2014

How many Bushes do we need in the White House? They are the root of evil beneath the fake veneer we call democracy. Prescott Bush was a Hitler sympathizer, Bush Sr a CIA contract agent during the Bay of Pigs and JFK assassination and ultimately CIA director when they had to clean up the MK Ultra and assassinations mess and then VP when Reagan was threatened and I'd bet he was banking on Reagan not pulling through after Hinkley shot him. Ironic that the entire Bush and Hinkley families were friends both politically and personally. Then we get Bush Sr's administration back with GW and now we have to prepare for Jeb and ultimately Prescott Jr as they trick the Hispanic block to vote for them? All the while the other repub candidates are courting Rumsfeld? A bonafide war criminal? This is what happens when fluffed on our side act like weaklings and don't put the final nail in the coffin. We lose a lot of votes too because it's simply human nature not to respect the spineless no matter how right or ethical they are. Our party has been infiltrated at the leadership level with corporatists and turncoats to ensure the trend of conservative dominance. Even Obama likens himself to a 1980s moderate republican. How many people here would've voted for a moderate republican in the 1980s? Hell no. Bush Sr was labeled a moderate republican then but anyone with even a walnut sized brain knew that was just opinion management and hoodwinked preprogrammed media blitz brainwashing. We need to always be fighting, challenging and questioning authority on both sides because when we get comfortable we lose...and we are much too comfortable right now. The Bushes should have been tarred and feathered and run out of town but instead they are honored with pomp and circumstance by Bill and even Obama...and no Obama didn't have to do that to be presidential. Some people will excuse anything.

Skittles

(153,174 posts)
64. as someone who lives in Texas (we put up with SIX EXTRA YEARS OF DUBYA)
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 05:38 PM
Apr 2014

the idea of yet another Bush makes me utterly f***ing SICK

 

pragmatic_dem

(410 posts)
71. yep - history repeats itself, Obama was consulting Bush, Condi et all for Afghanistan surge
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 08:25 PM
Apr 2014

which turned into a violent loss of life and a financial disaster.

And of course, every Democratic president has to earn his conservative chops by wholesaling millions of jobs to other countries - Clinton has NAFTA, Obama is rushing in to get TPP passed.

Goddam it, you can't make this shit up. We will never learn.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
48. Tad early to be saying "I told you so." don't you think?
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 09:55 AM
Apr 2014

Why don't we all settle down and let the whole process play out? The reason Jeb Bush is getting talked about at all is the slow moving meltdown of Chris Christie. "I'm not Chris Christie" is hardly the basis for a winning campaign and is likely to work about as well for Jeb as "I'm not Mitt Romney" did for the Clown Brigade did in 2012.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
82. I've Heard Jebs Name Since 2008
Tue Apr 8, 2014, 07:25 AM
Apr 2014

Yes Christie would've been more popular and a better front man for the cartel but he botched it. Who knows...maybe the Bushes are making sure he doesn't get a lifeline. I put nothing past that family of snakes.

IkeRepublican

(406 posts)
83. I can see what you mean, BH, but...
Tue Apr 8, 2014, 09:17 PM
Apr 2014

Comparing Papa Bush versus Sonny in the public eye is apples and oranges. Jeb's not going to be president and his chances at being the Repukelickan nominee are slight at best. Who will they run? Another Romney type and he will lose. The Bush Brand has wrecked their own name with Sonny and the teatards might do well in their already-Republican districts, but outside of that they're toast.

Submariner

(12,506 posts)
2. A corrupt smuggler FLOTUS with her drug addled kids
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 04:03 PM
Apr 2014

would be quite the change from the dignified first family we have today. No more pond scum Bush family in the White House.

Warpy

(111,319 posts)
8. Yeah, because this country is desperate for another Bush
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 04:11 PM
Apr 2014

I think we need to make it illegal for anyone from that family to run for the next 500 years. With any luck the DNA will be so diluted by then that the evil and rapacity will not breed as true.

 

Tom Ripley

(4,945 posts)
13. The GOP has no other "establishment republican" to foist on the knuckle-draggers...
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 04:38 PM
Apr 2014

whether the knuckle-draggers want the candidate or not.
As always their servile numbers will relent, eat shit, and say it tastes great...until they once again lose the election and start up their "never again" litany all over again. Republican voters are a special kind of stupid.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
29. They don't. They have no one who's not a complete crook or godbag. I swear,
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 08:52 PM
Apr 2014

I'm right when I say there's an 80% chance our choices in 2016 will be Clinton and Bush. And yes, that means this country has jumped the shark.

anobserver2

(836 posts)
14. Some conservatives, like Michelle Malkin, can't stand Jeb Bush
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 04:43 PM
Apr 2014

Some conservatives, including Michelle Malkin, really can't stand Jeb Bush:

http://michellemalkin.com/2013/08/02/rotten-to-the-core-jeb-bushs-crony-republicans-against-higher-standards/

Rotten to the Core: Jeb Bush’s Crony Republicans Against Higher Standards

...Bush’s foundation has now joined with the Common Core-peddling Fordham Institute under a new phony-baloney umbrella group: “Conservatives for Higher Standards.” While its list of supporters includes federal bureaucrats, politicians and business interests, there are no grassroots conservative parents or teacher groups. So beware of this “conservative” front. ...

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
33. It serves a purpose. It actually helps Jeb's image.
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 09:21 PM
Apr 2014

It helps him appear to be more of a moderate than he is. You know, considering Michelle Malkin is one of the more repulsive far right wing loons.

He'll have us in a new and improved war within his first term. If we are unlucky enough that he is elected.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
92. Whatever Democratic candidate Jeb faces
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 05:24 AM
Apr 2014

the winning strategy is to play up the bloodthirsty Bush war angle. His brother also wanted to privatize Social Security. Both issues are losing issues for Jeb Bush. I wish we could separate our party on education but that ship has sailed.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
94. unfortunately Hillary is a war hawk. Not only yes on Iraq, but she pushed the disastrous
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 10:08 AM
Apr 2014

surge in Afghanistan. And I seem to remember she made war noises in other, more recent situations too...

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
15. 3 Bushes? Why don't they just call themselves "the royal family."
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 04:49 PM
Apr 2014

And a Bush against a Clinton? Isn't that what you call deja vu. Remember 1992?

To me, the thought of both a Clinton and a Bush considering, just considering, a run for the presidency confirms my belief that the US is running out of creativity and new ideas.

What a terrible end for democracy.

I don't care whether Jeb and Hillary are the greatest or worst people in the world. They are more of the same old corruption -- both of them.

So for 2016 we are to get yet again a choice between evil corruption and even more evil corruption. Horrors! Surely we can do better.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
53. Both represent family dynasties.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 11:09 AM
Apr 2014

We are establishing a terrible trend when we elect two or more presidents from one family.

But frankly, I think that while now these old shoe candidates look acceptable and even very popular, all of them, like Christie, have taken ethical shortcuts that will eliminate them from the field.

In particular, the Republicans with all their Koch money will devastate Hillary Clinton's reputation. Fair or not, I predict it will happen. And voters will be confused as to whether they can trust her or not. It does not take much to cause voters to latch on to some scandal real or bogus that destroys a candidates campaign.

I think this is a good year for a dark horse candidate with a populist message and a pretty impeccable ethical record. That's my judgment.

Time will tell.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
57. First, the Clintons are not a dynasty unless Chelsea runs for office too.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 12:45 PM
Apr 2014

They are a married couple, she's not his progeny.

Second, the Koch brothers will try to destroy the Democratic nominee, regardless of who that person turns out to be. Hillary is a well known commodity, there's not much more than they can attack her that they haven't attacked her on already. I don't think they are going to be able to "devastate" her reputation. People already know whether they like her or not. So far, the majority seems to like her just fine. She has the highest polls of any non-incumbent in the history of the Democratic party. That's good enough for me. She's the only candidate who consistently outpolls any of their candidates. The rest are barely in the double or single digits.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
68. Sorry, Beacool.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 06:46 PM
Apr 2014

There's lots more that they can attack Hillary on. And the problem is that when attacked, Hillary gets peeved and shows it. In contrast, Obama just brushes it off.

And what is even more, when Hillary is attacked, Bill rushes to defend her. That he should not do. If she runs, he should stay very quietly to the side like wives used to do when their husbands ran. That is going to be very tough for him.

I just do not think that a Hillary candidacy is smart. I don't think it is viable.

Of course, whether she could win depends on how bad the Republican candidate is. But although she appears to be quite popular now among hard-core, reliable Democrats and even some others, I just don't think she is a good choice for 2016.

Like I said, 2016 will be the year for a credible populist who has a track record of reliability and impeccable ethics.

America is ready for someone who cannot be bought.

Democrats are running in part on the anti-Koch-corruption platform. If we run someone who has close ties to Wall Street and Walmart (like Hillary), our anti-Koch, anti-corruption campaign will at best be unconvincing and fall on deaf ears, and at worst, look two-faced and hypocritical.

We need a candidate whose past is as free as possible from any inkling of corruption and overly political deal-making especially if we are going to run against the corruption and machine-politics of the Republicans.

We need consistency between pointing to the Republicans' selling their votes to corporations and our own independence from corporations.

We cannot afford to be doing the same kinds of corrupt deals that we accuse the Republicans of doing.

You don't get Walmart's and Wall Street's support unless you give them back something in return. So what would Hillary be giving them?

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
97. I'm tired of the constant arguing.
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 01:01 PM
Apr 2014

I don't care who here does not like the Clintons.

This is not going to be like 2008, barring an unforeseen eventuality, if Hillary runs she wins the nomination.

Having said that, everyone is entitled to vote for whichever candidate they prefer in the primaries.

Todays_Illusion

(1,209 posts)
95. Mark this liberal Democratic voter who will vote 3rd party
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 11:57 AM
Apr 2014

if Hillary is the candidate for many reasons.

Hillary is too friendly with the corporate conservatives, they lover her, and her capitulating husband.

The Republicans plan to replay the entire Bill Clinton sex files.
You will have the pleasure of a blow job campaign.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
96. Then you better not utter a peep if a Republican wins in 2016.
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 12:56 PM
Apr 2014

There were people who didn't care for Obama in 2008 and we still voted for him because the alternative was far worse.

Frankly, I'm fed up with the Left and their constant harping over the Clintons. In the primaries vote for anyone you like, that's your prerogative, but there are far more important issues than purity tests in 2016. We may lose the Senate this year. In 2017 a new president may have to work with a Republican majority in both chambers. That would be great for a Republican president. Is that what you would prefer?

Mr.Bill

(24,312 posts)
17. Brilliant announcement
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 04:57 PM
Apr 2014

since anyone running for President will pretty much need to decide by then.

Until then he can make millions on speaking engagements and have someone write a book with his name on the cover like Sarah Palin does.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
18. Are we supposed to hold our breaths until then?
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 05:02 PM
Apr 2014

I think to me there's more suspense in knowing which room of the house my pet tortoise will decide to hibernate in this winter.

lark

(23,138 posts)
24. Don't take him lightly
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 06:18 PM
Apr 2014

He IS the smarter Bush. He runs as a moderate but governs hard core right. Everything he runs against, he's totally for. He even went so far in FL to propose bills, see them passed then find a sneaky way to ensure that change never happens. I'm sure the folks in DU who live in FL remember the big Everglades clean up lie. Yeah Jeb wants immigration changed, but you can bet your bottom dollar voting rights won't be included. Now that Christie has imploded, he's the one Repug that really scares me for 2016.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
30. Your problem is being "scared." Progressives need to harden their spines. Enough jellyism.
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 09:03 PM
Apr 2014

Clinton will kick his ass if he runs. This country won't tolerate a third Bush.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
51. Clinton might kick his ass, but Hillary is not progressive on economic issues, foreign policies
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 10:55 AM
Apr 2014

and a bunch of other ways that matter most.

Gay and abortion rights won't do you much good if Wall Street is still calling the shots and you live in a cardboard box under a bridge (until they decide they can make money selling your organs).

lark

(23,138 posts)
56. Being scared doesn't mean being immobile or helpless.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 12:40 PM
Apr 2014

If you are scared of an opponent, you attack back more ferociously and don't just assume the win. Assuming Clinton will wipe the ground with him is a perscription for losing. Even with a candidate as weak and ineffectual as Mittens, he got close to 50% of the vote. Jeb would probably do better than that. I doubt Hillary is taking him for granted, she's too smart.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
26. We have a large population here in America
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 07:42 PM
Apr 2014

Can't we find someone new to run for President?

Certainly not another Bush.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
89. yes, but what makes you think it's our choice?
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 06:41 PM
Apr 2014

We've been given our choice. Hillary or Jeb. Like it or lump it.

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
27. "The Family," the shadowy rightwing religious Cult that runs the Prayer Breakfast said "Expect great
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 07:53 PM
Apr 2014

things from George W. Bush." So, what does "The Family" think of ol' Jeb???


"THE FAMILY: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power," Jeff Sharlet, 2008 HarperCollins

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
32. Oh, he's running alright. It's enough to turn the stomach.
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 09:15 PM
Apr 2014

And the entire media will be cheering him on while they try to absolve Dubya of his guilt.

 

pragmatic_dem

(410 posts)
37. I see. Bush vs. Clinton, a clean slate, fresh leadership, a bold new direction...
Sun Apr 6, 2014, 11:53 PM
Apr 2014

And to really mix things up, Bush should pick Liz Cheney as VP. How's that for fresh?

Meanwhile, the spiritual wars will continue while the rich continue to tear away the flesh from the middle class, just like the jackals they are.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
54. would you like your corporate rule with a side of gay bashing or gay hugging?
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 11:10 AM
Apr 2014

abortion or anti-abortion?

guns or guns lite?

We get to pick soup or salad, but the entrees stay the same.

gate of the sun

(1,658 posts)
39. I don't believe in dynasty political figures this includes Hilary
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 12:33 AM
Apr 2014

But I think having another bush term is beyond even thinking of, or contemplating....it's plain gross and I don't think bush jr is painting those pictures it's some college student. Enough of the bushes!!

 

aurelio17

(11 posts)
40. He has already decided.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 12:57 AM
Apr 2014

He would not take a position on a national issue like this one if he hadn't already made up his mind to run.

Just imagine. Three Bushes? Will the nightmare never end?

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
42. The Bushes manage to leave the country progressively weaker and worse off
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 01:41 AM
Apr 2014

with each term they serve. One more for the final smoking ruins!

BeyondGeography

(39,377 posts)
52. Be shocked if he didn't run
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 10:57 AM
Apr 2014

He was always supposed to be Prezzy one day. The big shock was his maladjusted brother got the chance first. In a saner world, his performance would have ended Jeb's hopes, but not in this country.

Of course, his candidacy would totally defuse the "not another Clinton," angle. He can try to position himself as center-right, but not after primary season and the inevitable rhetorical compromises it will take for him to get through. Still, the Republicans will unite whomever they run and it will be a tough race, like the last one, which is now becoming blowout in too many minds here, even though Obama had to run the table in close battleground fights (11 for 12) to get those 332 EV. And that only happened because he had built the best analytical data base in campaign history.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
55. Fox ran their "A Bush Family Albumn" almost on an endless loop over the weekend.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 11:32 AM
Apr 2014

The Bush Name rehabilitation program is obviously in full swing...he's running.

JCMach1

(27,566 posts)
59. Biggest clown in the clown car, but he is the only clown that could unite all elements in the Repig
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 02:29 PM
Apr 2014

party...

With Christy finished..., JEBtm may be the goto guy...

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
60. Jeb Bush has a few political skeletons banging around in his closet.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 02:45 PM
Apr 2014

Florida 2000 and Katherine Harris for example. Many unanswered questions there waiting for the right investigative reporter to start digging around. Some lips may be loosened now that the statue of limitations on election law violations is long past.

 

Tom Ripley

(4,945 posts)
67. The keyboard warrior wing of the GOP is absolutely terrified that Bush is going to be the nominee...
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 06:14 PM
Apr 2014

I've been lurking (and maybe disrupting) some of their sites and their roar of NO MORE RINOS! is deafening.

lanlady

(7,135 posts)
69. The United States needs another Bush...
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 07:16 PM
Apr 2014

...like Ukraine needs another Yanukovych or Romania needs another Ceacescu. Ugh. UGH.

 

aurelio17

(11 posts)
73. Jeb was supposed to be Prez, not Dubya, in Bush senior's plans.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 08:44 PM
Apr 2014

He actually cried when he was asked about Jeb's missed opportunity, which was siezed by GWB.

Check it out here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/12/05/former-president-bush-breaks-down-in-tears-talking-about-jeb-bush/

Maybe Poppy will get his dream. (Shudder.)

elaristotle

(26 posts)
78. A Republican who is sane on Immigration will never be president
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 10:19 PM
Apr 2014

Once Loony Rick Perry said "Have a Heart" about immigration he was toast. Apparently Jeb Bush didn't watch the results of the 2012 primaries.

calguy

(5,324 posts)
80. The Bushitter.3 has decided long ago
Tue Apr 8, 2014, 02:35 AM
Apr 2014

He's running. He's just trying to make it look like he's making a personal sacrifice to get on that white horse and ride into the race. When his mommy said she hoped he wouldn't run, why do you think she also he was " by far the best qualified". (barf) everything the bushitters do or say is a calculated move to gain more power.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
85. Translation: The PNAC'ers are in it to win it
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 02:41 AM
Apr 2014

(wink, wink). And by win, they mean by whatever means necessary. That is why they computerized and centralized voting during the last administration.

Liberalman777

(35 posts)
87. I ever there was a chance for a repeat of 2000 election here it Is!
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 09:23 AM
Apr 2014

They would rig the election for another Bush!

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
98. In other words, a Republican Congress would make the job easy...
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 01:48 PM
Apr 2014

...and he's not interested in work.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeb Bush Says He Will Dec...