Appellate court reverses course, issues stay on same-sex marriages until Wednesday
Source: Detroit Free Press
LANSING The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, after first signaling it would not intervene in Michigans gay marriage case until Tuesday, posted a new order late Saturday imposing a stay in the case until Wednesday.
That means U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedmans Friday order declaring unconstitutional Michigans voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage is temporarily stayed, and clerks will no longer be able to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples before Wednesday at the earliest.
To allow a more reasoned consideration of the motion to stay, it is ordered that the district court judgment is temporarily stayed until Wednesday, the 6th Circuit said in an order late Saturday.
Read more: http://www.freep.com/article/20140322/NEWS06/303220063/Appellate-court-reverses-course-issues-stay-same-sex-marriages-until-Wednesday
Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)Atty Gen Schuette is pandering to the tea partiers by pushing for this as he runs for re-election. He may win re-election, but he's going to lose this fight.
Timez Squarez
(262 posts)You can count Schuette among the big fat losers of 2014.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)have the possibility of their marriage being invalidated.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)They could have just let it go but oh no...SOBs.
If you or I tried to go to "court" on a weekend, would we get the same prompt service?
Hell no.
Timez Squarez
(262 posts)so the stay is not justified.
The religious right fuckwits needs to be moved to Bikini Atoll and remain there for their natural lives and ensure that the gene pool dies.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)issues a ruling in favor of marriage equality the ruling should be stayed for at least 30 days pending appeal. Appeal will not always happen as in the case of New Jersey and Kentucky but in most cases where states have enacted legislation or adopted constitutional amendments prohibiting marriage equality, the state will appeal.
While it is wonderful for a handful of couples to be able to marry and their marriages would likely never be rescinded, it is better to stay the decision and await the outcome of the appellate court.
I know it is frustrating but it is a better course of action.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I was saying in another post last night that I thought a higher court would step in and stay the decision. Even if they hadn't until Monday all anyone would have been able to do on Saturday is get the marriage license (the article in the other thread said there is a three day wait in Michigan).
A final decision without any legal limbo is what is going to make the difference. The fact that there are so many decisions to overturn the laws is encouraging.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Suppose the city exercises eminent domain to take part of your property because they want to widen a road. You fight in court and lose. When you appeal, do you want the initial ruling stayed, so the city can't chop down the 100-year-old tree there? Under those circumstances, it would be obvious that a stay was appropriate, even if the city had a very good case for being entitled to take the land.
In the same-sex marriage case, a court's likely reasoning would be along these lines: "If we grant the stay, and the marriage-equality side ultimately wins, then the people affected can get married, they'll just have to wait a little longer. If we deny the stay, and the homophobe side ultimately wins, then we'll have some couples with marriages that were officially solemnized but that don't conform to the law -- a messy and confusing situation. Let's just grant the stay and be safe."
Incidentally, it's not uncommon that a stay is granted on condition -- the side taking the appeal must prosecute the appeal on an expedited basis, so that the additional wait is no longer than it needs to be. I don't know if that was done here, but it would be reasonable to impose that condition on the state.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)But full rights for LGBT's nationwide is inevitable. It's still going to take some time to get there but progress has been faster than I could have even dreamed only a few years ago.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Response to brooklynite (Original post)
alp227 This message was self-deleted by its author.
former9thward
(32,025 posts)He overturned Michigan's ban on gay marriage. What is POS about that?
Response to former9thward (Reply #13)
alp227 This message was self-deleted by its author.
former9thward
(32,025 posts)He did not renege, NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU SHOUT. His decision was stayed by a higher court -- the Sixth Circuit.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)However you feel, how is his picture relevant?