Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 01:30 PM Mar 2012

Pittsburgh-area site is chosen for major refinery

Source: Associated Press

PITTSBURGH March 15, 2012, 12:49 pm ET

PITTSBURGH (AP) — Shell Oil Co. has chosen a site near Pittsburgh for a major new petrochemical refinery that could provide a huge economic boost to the region.

Dan Carlson, Shell's General Manager of New Business Development, said Thursday that the company signed a land option agreement with Horsehead Corp. to evaluate a site near Monaca, about 35 miles northwest of Pittsburgh.

Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania had all sought the plant and offered Shell major tax incentives. Monaca is just 20 miles from both the Ohio and West Virginia borders, so workers in all three states are likely to benefit.

But Shell said the Monaca site, currently home to Horsehead's zinc factory, had the mix of resource and transportation attributes "to accommodate facilities for a world scale petrochemical complex and potential future expansions."

Read more: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=148683577

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pittsburgh-area site is chosen for major refinery (Original Post) IDemo Mar 2012 OP
From the article: Cirque du So-What Mar 2012 #1
Funny and appropriate on two levels IDemo Mar 2012 #2
Yeah, I caught that too Cirque du So-What Mar 2012 #3
I think he is refering to a "hydrocracker" Arctic Dave Mar 2012 #6
Obviously it's a refining term IDemo Mar 2012 #7
Gee, they just spent millions tearing down all the refineries in the Oil City Area and moving them appleannie1 Mar 2012 #4
For tax breaks and to lock int their plans to Frack the environment, $16,000,000,000/x,000jobs=?/job Vincardog Mar 2012 #5

Cirque du So-What

(25,941 posts)
1. From the article:
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 01:39 PM
Mar 2012
Ohio and West Virginia officials had made all-out efforts to attract the plant. Last year West Virginia Commerce Secretary Keith Burdette said, "We intend to compete with the last breath in our body to attract one or more crackers,"...


http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=148683577

Congrats, West Virginia. You've already exceeded your goal beyond our wildest imagination in that regard.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
2. Funny and appropriate on two levels
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 01:55 PM
Mar 2012

One, the obvious "crackers" reference. Two, the "last breath in our body"; it fits for the topic of creating more petroleum product.

appleannie1

(5,067 posts)
4. Gee, they just spent millions tearing down all the refineries in the Oil City Area and moving them
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 02:19 PM
Mar 2012

to the Gulf Coast. Now they want to bring them back?

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
5. For tax breaks and to lock int their plans to Frack the environment, $16,000,000,000/x,000jobs=?/job
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 03:49 PM
Mar 2012

West Virginia offered to slash property tax rates for 25 years in exchange of at least $2 billion worth of investment, Pennsylvania offered 15 years of tax breaks, while Ohio also reportedly courted Shell with major incentives.

The American Chemistry Council, in a report last year, estimated the new petrochemical complex could attract up to $16 billion in private investment and create thousands of construction jobs.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pittsburgh-area site is c...