Goldman Stunned by Op-Ed Loses $2.2 Billion
Source: Business Week
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) saw $2.15 billion of its market value wiped out after an employee assailed Chief Executive Officer Lloyd C. Blankfeins management and the firms treatment of clients, sparking debate across Wall Street.
The shares dropped 3.4 percent in New York trading yesterday, the third-biggest decline in the 81-company Standard & Poors 500 Financials Index, after London-based Greg Smith made the accusations in a New York Times op-ed piece.
Smith, who also wrote that he was quitting after 12 years at the company, blamed Blankfein, 57, and President Gary D. Cohn, 51, for a decline in the firms moral fiber. They responded in a memo to current and former employees, saying that Smiths assertions dont reflect the firms values, culture or how the vast majority of people at Goldman Sachs think about the firm and the work it does on behalf of our clients.
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, 84, whose Volcker rule would limit banks like New York-based Goldman Sachs from making bets with their own money, called Smiths article a radical, strong piece. Im afraid its a business that leads to a lot of conflicts of interest, Volcker said at a conference in Washington sponsored by the Atlantic.
Read more: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-14/goldman-stunned-by-op-ed-loses-2-dot-2-billion-for-shareholders
Proof that talk is not necessarily cheap. I imagine Mr. Smith has angered several people.
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Mopar151
(9,989 posts)The bad faith, double dealing, skimming and outright theft practiced by Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street "Players" should have resulted in serious jail time, and asset seizures & liquidation unprecedented in modern times.
Bernie Madoff was a pipsqueak by comparison.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Besides, the banksters didn't do anything illegal, right, Obama?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Or so I have been told.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Their choices and their utter contempt towards those who do not have what they do are what makes them bad people. JFK and FDR were both privileged growing up but they managed to turn out decent.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)I don't think so.
Keep spinning; you need the practice.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Attacking them for being amoral, soulless husks who hate poor people is better because it points toward intentions.
And where do you get the idea that I was "spinning"?
Mopar151
(9,989 posts)I've met some who were born to wealth and priviledge, who were very good people, and others - even siblings - who turned out nasty. Lots of factors involved besides $$$$$ - like having someone in their lives who cared how they turned out.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Give a little back, Blankface
tcaudilllg
(1,553 posts)fasttense
(17,301 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)All together now ... Visualize this => The Invisible Hand(s) tightening around Goldman Sachs' own neck.
Hats off - BIG respect to Greg Smith, the ex-Goldman Sachs executive who authored this story.
Many blessings for hit courage and integrity. May The Force keep him and his family safe.
marmar
(77,081 posts)irisblue
(32,980 posts)if an op ed hurts them....i'm imaging their fear at a perp walk ....
nxylas
(6,440 posts)That is all.
midnight
(26,624 posts)"Think about this for a moment, because, well, it is utterly unthinkable in the annals of Goldmandom. Cosa Nostra be damned, an executive decides to go out as publicly and bitterly as possible, foregoing what was likely a substantial exit bonus that would have been predicated on his signing a nondisclosure agreement. To go up against perhaps the worlds most powerful and connected financial institution, whose PR apparatus is now helmed by the former right-hand to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. A bank that is repped by more $1,000-an-hour attorneys than last spotted in the sprawling campus of lawyer hell."http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/216043-obama-and-cameron-promise-to-work-together-on-cybersecurity
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)from laughing so hard.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I thought 'if I had money with Goldman Sachs, I'd remove it'.
PassingFair
(22,434 posts)Didn't know it would make real waves.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)bet they won't move it.
Maybe we should ask him to?????
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)their Gold Mansacks.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)Mwa ha ha ha ha
Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)Our allegedly free, capitalistic stock market is highly touted. But? Our system, especially the free stock market, is not as rational or as good, as people thought.
Especially, the core of our whole economy, is dominated not by Reason, but by fickle Psychology. It is literally at risk everyday, from the whims of uninformed, emotional buys and sellers.
That, I submit, is a fundamental problem with Capitalism, and with the Stock Market.
Especially when all our retirement money was handed over to the stock market, in 401 K's etc.? Then huge, gigantic amounts of dumb money were dumped on the market. Guaranteeing that our economy would be even more emotional, fickle, and "irrationally exhuberant." Until our "bubble" burst. While any lessons that might have been learned, are remembered for only a very short time. And then the market is back up and down, again.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)How about a REALLY free market?
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Actually Reason is just a nice explanation we give ourselves for doing what we want to do.
I would hate to live in a world where Reason decides how to allocate resources. Leaving aside the intractable knowledge problem, I don't want to live where my betters get to decide what I get to buy and where I get to live.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)"This is not how the majority of the company feels."
What he left out was: "Me personally? Oh, they're all fucking rubes for trusting us. Stupid poors."
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)"Siiiiiiiiiiiiigh . . . how much longer IS this puppet show going to go on? I have a Congressional whipping to attend."
crazylikafox
(2,758 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Pachamama
(16,887 posts)....evil a-holes who have raped this country* and its citizens more.....
*actually, many countries
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, Julian Englis.
Julian Englis
(2,309 posts)The sad thing is this probably will not lead to real reform. The loss is just a paper loss and will probably be gone soon enough as the economy keeps growing under Obama presidency. A new Glass-Steagall is needed.
WheelWalker
(8,955 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,035 posts)What a shame.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)The powers that be want Chinese style speech regulations and a hogtied internet. If half of what they sweep under the rug comes out, they may explode like Vampires in sunlight.
WestSeattle2
(1,730 posts)can be no bankruptcy. Goldman Sachs is truly one of America's sleaziest enterprises, exceptionally sleazy in fact, by any reasonable person's definition. How anyone with any moral fiber could last 12 years in that den of thieves and grifters, is beyond me.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)This is what needs to happen, en masse.
We are human beings. We need to reclaim that, over any corporate identification.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)We need more people on wall street to stand up and do the right thing like Mr. Smith. Goldman deserves to lose every cent of their ill gotten gains.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)This guy needs a LOT of time on Current TV.
lostnote12
(159 posts).....I'd say this guy is either a plant and we should beware of another financial shoe to drop on our nation OR rat pellet shot to the head at another gated community traffic intersection....
Baxter was suicided
lovuian
(19,362 posts)Smith is right
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Yep, if I ever get money to invest, I'll be calling that whistleblower right away.