U.S. can keep Guantanamo hunger strikers alive by force: court
Source: Reuters
BY DAVID INGRAM
WASHINGTON Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:59pm EST
(Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court declined on Tuesday to halt the forced feeding of hunger strikers in Guantanamo Bay but ruled that the prisoners have the right to sue over the procedure and other aspects of how the U.S. military treats them.
The 2-1 decision by a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed two decisions by lower court judges. Those judges ruled last year that Congress had stripped them of the ability to hear lawsuits about conditions at the U.S. Navy military prison in Cuba.
Human rights advocates and many doctors call forced feeding a violation of personal liberty and medical ethics. Designed to keep hunger strikers alive, the procedure involves feeding them liquid meals via tubes inserted into their noses and down into their stomachs.
President Barack Obama has defended the practice at Guantanamo, telling a news conference last year, "I don't want these individuals to die."
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/11/us-usa-courts-guantanamo-idUSBREA1A28K20140211
avebury
(10,952 posts)It makes me think of Sylvia Pankhurst and the women suffragettes who were force fed.
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/force_feeding_suffragettes.htm
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2013/07/17/sylvia_pankhurst_the_suffragette_s_first_person_account_of_force_feeding.html
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)President Obama is for this practice. They are still getting their information out to the masses.
avebury
(10,952 posts)Edit to add - It is the right of any person to refuse treatment, medical or food & water. To me what they are doing is a human rights violation because the methodology they will most certainly not be humane. It was wrong when the did it to the suffragettes, it was wrong when they did it to the IRA prisoners, and it is wrong in this case.
I have a problem with indefinite detention because we should be required to prove in a court of law that the prisoners have broken a law. How do we know that all the people being held are guilty of war crimes? How do we know that some of the prisoners weren't turned in by people with personal beefs with them or because the "snitch" found it a profitable line of business? What has been done at Guantanamo Bay could easily occur in this country at some point in time as local governments develop more militarized police forces and our rights continue to be stripped away. If we don't demand a certain criminal justice process for the worst amongst who will be there to fight for our rights when the time comes?
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)Still torturing our prisoners, dammit. I thought Obama was going to put a stop to that. Along with closing the damned embarrassment down, of course.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)History is going to Judge the Prison at Guantánamo very very harshly.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)eom
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)is the way he deals with detainees (who have been declared not Terrorist Threats) who have NO HOPE and just want to die...because they know they will never get OUT OF THERE!
They have the CHOICE over their LIVES...when all HOPE is EXHAUSTED...to END IT!
Force Feeding is Cruel and Inhumane Punishment.
It's Disgusting...that this is going on when we were promised with our vote that GITMO would END.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Preventing hunger strikes serves a political purpose, to deflect attention from the ongoing detention of people who have been held without charge for over 10 years.
A gross violation of due process.
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)shakes head
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)If there's a will, there's a way.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)says this court.
Creepy...like some bad horror movie.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)I never thought I would see my country become what it has become.
lovuian
(19,362 posts)is denied them
writ of habeas corpus, a procedural device to force the courts to examine the lawfulness of a prisoner's detention.
and I really am not happy they are placing our military in such a terrible position
We have no problem enacting the death penalty once a guilty verdict is made on US citizens
look at Texas
there is no getting around this whole ordeal its torture
and I am so disappointed in Obama not keeping his promise